Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-j67x-q29f-qcvv
No affected components available
Summary
The ActionHandler.post() method in motionEye has no authentication decorator, allowing any unauthenticated attacker to trigger camera actions including snapshots, recording start/stop, and configured action scripts (PTZ controls, alarm triggers, etc.).
Vulnerability Details
File: motioneye/handlers/action.py — ActionHandler.post() line 36
CWE: CWE-862 — Missing Authorization
CVSS: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N = 5.3 Medium
Vulnerable Code
class ActionHandler(BaseHandler):
async def post(self, camera_id, action): # ← NO @BaseHandler.auth() decorator
camera_id = int(camera_id)
if camera_id not in config.get_camera_ids():
raise HTTPError(404, 'no such camera')
...
if action == 'snapshot':
await self.snapshot(camera_id) # executed without auth
return
elif action == 'record_start':
return self.record_start(camera_id)
elif action == 'record_stop':
return self.record_stop(camera_id)
action_commands = config.get_action_commands(local_config)
command = action_commands.get(action)
...
self.run_command_bg(command) # executes predefined shell scripts
Compare with other handlers that correctly require authentication:
@BaseHandler.auth(admin=True) # ← properly protected
async def delete(self, camera_id, filename):
...
Steps to Reproduce
- Deploy motionEye with at least one camera configured
- Send unauthenticated POST:
POST /action/1/snapshot HTTP/1.1
Host: motioneye-host:8765
Content-Length: 0
- Observe
{}(HTTP 200) response — snapshot triggered without any credentials
For action scripts (lock, unlock, alarm_on, alarm_off, light_on, etc.):
POST /action/1/alarm_on HTTP/1.1
Host: motioneye-host:8765
Impact
- Unauthenticated attacker can trigger camera snapshots on demand
- Unauthenticated attacker can start/stop video recording
- If action scripts are configured by admin: attacker can trigger PTZ movement, alarm control, lighting changes — physical security bypass
- Via remote cameras: SSRF by triggering action on a remote motionEye server
Verification
Dynamically confirmed on v0.43.1 in Docker lab — POST /action/2/snapshot with no credentials returns HTTP 200 {}. Server log shows the action was processed (failed only because motion daemon was not running for the test camera, not due to an auth rejection).
Recommended Fix
class ActionHandler(BaseHandler):
@BaseHandler.auth() # add authentication requirement
async def post(self, camera_id, action):
...
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
Probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
- CVE-2026-55863Alias
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard