Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-hjf4-fphr-2h65
Summary
A BatchingProcessor in go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/log can enter a tight CPU loop when the asynchronous export buffer is full. Under exporter backpressure, attacker-driven high-volume log emission can keep the queue at or above the batch size, causing repeated immediate export retries and a denial of service through CPU exhaustion.
Introduced in commit: 4af9c20
Details
NewBatchingProcessor wraps the exporter with newBufferExporter(exporter, 1) (sdk/log/batch.go:116-122), so the asynchronous export input can fill quickly when the downstream exporter blocks. The poll goroutine dequeues a batch with b.q.TryDequeue, calls b.exporter.EnqueueExport(r), and then immediately sends on b.pollTrigger whenever qLen >= b.batchSize (sdk/log/batch.go:129-165).
bufferExporter.EnqueueExport is non-blocking: it sends to e.input if possible and returns false in the default case when the channel is full (sdk/log/exporter.go:221-248). TryDequeue leaves q.len unchanged when the write callback returns false (sdk/log/batch.go:289-314). Therefore, while the exporter is backpressured, EnqueueExport fails, the queue remains at or above one full batch, and the poll loop continuously retriggers itself without waiting for the ticker.
PoC
The validation artifact contains a PoC bundle:
validation-artifact.tar:main.go: PoC source.validation-artifact.tar:README.md: build/run notes.validation-artifact.tar:build_failed.log: captured build failure from the validation environment.
The PoC configures a blocking exporter and a BatchingProcessor with WithExportMaxBatchSize(1), WithExportInterval(5*time.Second), and WithMaxQueueSize(2048). It emits 1000 records, records a CPU profile for 750 ms while the exporter is blocked, then writes /workspace/validation_artifacts/busyloop.pprof.
Reproduction steps from an affected checkout at commit 4af9c20:
cd /workspace/opentelemetry-go
git checkout 4af9c20
mkdir -p validation_poc/busyloop /workspace/validation_artifacts /tmp/batchingprocessor-busyloop-poc
tar -xf /path/to/this/finding/validation-artifact.tar -C /tmp/batchingprocessor-busyloop-poc
cp /tmp/batchingprocessor-busyloop-poc/main.go validation_poc/busyloop/main.go
go build -o validation_poc/busyloop/busyloop ./validation_poc/busyloop
./validation_poc/busyloop/busyloop
go tool pprof -top /workspace/validation_artifacts/busyloop.pprof
Expected program output:
cpu profile written to /workspace/validation_artifacts/busyloop.pprof
Expected profile evidence: hot functions should include (*BatchingProcessor).poll, (*queue).TryDequeue, and (*bufferExporter).EnqueueExport, showing repeated export attempts while the exporter is blocked.
Impact
This is an availability vulnerability: uncontrolled CPU consumption caused by a busy-spin retry loop. Applications using sdk/log BatchingProcessor are impacted when an attacker can cause sustained log emission and the configured exporter or downstream collector is slow, blocked, or otherwise backpressured. The impact is limited to the embedding process but can degrade or deny service for that application.
Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.
Drag and drop some file here, or click to select
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.
Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard