Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-hg9j-64wp-m9px
MediumCVSS 6.8 / 10Summary
A session hijacking vulnerability exists when an attacker-controlled authoritative subdomain under a parent domain (e.g., subdomain.host.com) sets cookies scoped to the parent domain (.host.com). This allows session token replacement for applications hosted on sibling subdomains (e.g., community.host.com) if session tokens aren't rotated post-authentication.
Key Constraints:
- Attacker must control any subdomain under the parent domain (e.g.,
evil.host.comorx.y.host.com). - Parent domain must not be on the Public Suffix List.
Due to non-existent session token rotation after authenticating we can theoretically reproduce the vulnerability by using browser dev tools, but due to the browser's security measures this does not seem to be exploitable as described.
Proof of Concept (Deno)
Deno.serve({
port: 8000, // default
hostname: 'localhost',
onListen: (o) => console.log(`Server started at http://${o.hostname}:${o.port}`, o),
},
async (req) => (console.log(req), new Response(
`You've been served! You came from ${req.headers.get('referer')}`,
{
//status: 302, // would redirect user to page they came from
status: 200,
headers: {
'set-cookie': 'session_cookie=mytoken; Domain=.deno.dev; Secure; HttpOnly',
'location': req.headers.get('referer')
}
}
))
);
Attack Flow
- Attacker Setup: Hosts server at
evil.host.com. - Harvest Session Token: Attacker visits
community.host.comto get a session token for himself to replace the victim's token with his own. - Victim Interaction: User clicks link to
https://evil.host.com. - Cookie Override: Server sets cookie with
Domain=.host.comand the harvested token from step 2. - Session Hijacking: Victim's future requests to
community.host.comuse attacker's token.
Why Reverse DNS Subdomains Fail
Browsers block cookie setting for parent domains unless:
- Authoritative Subdomain: Server must belong to a direct child domain (e.g.,
a.host.com, notx.y.host.com). - Public Suffix Exclusion: If
host.comis on the Public Suffix List (e.g., likegithub.io), browsers block cross-subdomain cookies.
Example:
- ❌
123.cust.dynamic.host.com→ Cannot setDomain=.host.com. - ✅
evil.host.com→ Can setDomain=.host.com(if not on PSL).
Browser Security Behavior
1. Cookie Domain Validation
Per RFC 6265 §5.3:
Cookies can only be set for domains the server is authoritative for.
2. Public Suffix List (PSL)
Domains like host.com on the PSL trigger browser protections:
Subdomains of PSL-listed domains cannot set cookies for parent domains.
Verification:
- Check PSL status: https://publicsuffix.org/list/
Impact
- Account Takeover: Attacker gains authenticated session access.
- Data Exposure: Email, private messages, and other personal data exposed.
- Exploitable Only If:
- Parent domain is not PSL-listed.
- Attacker controls direct child subdomain (e.g.,
evil.host.com).
Remediation
- Session Token Rotation:
// After authentication: invalidateOldSession(); const newToken = generateToken(); - Cookie Scoping (already in place):
// Restrict cookies to explicit subdomain: "Set-Cookie": "session=token; Domain=community.host.com; Secure; HttpOnly; SameSite=Lax"; - Public Suffix Registration:
Addhost.comto the Public Suffix List via PSL Submission.
Revised Vulnerability Criteria
Prerequisites:
- Attacker controls authoritative subdomain (e.g.,
evil.host.com). - Parent domain (
host.com) is not PSL-listed. - Session tokens persist post-authentication.
References
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. The attacker needs the user to perform some action, like clicking a link. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard