Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-h4hq-rgvh-wh27
No affected components available
Summary
Testing confirmed that even when a Manager has manage=false for a given collection, they can still perform the following management operations as long as they have access to the collection:
PUT /api/organizations/<org_id>/collections/<col_id>succeeds (HTTP 200)PUT /api/organizations/<org_id>/collections/<col_id>/userssucceeds (HTTP 200)DELETE /api/organizations/<org_id>/collections/<col_id>succeeds (HTTP 200)
Description
-
The Manager guard checks only whether the user can access the collection, not whether they have
manageprivileges. This check is directly applied to management endpoints. src/auth.rs:816if !Collection::can_access_collection(&headers.membership, &col_id, &conn).await { err_handler!("The current user isn't a manager for this collection") } -
The
can_access_collectionfunction does not evaluate themanageflag. src/db/models/collection.rs:140pub async fn can_access_collection(member: &Membership, col_id: &CollectionId, conn: &DbConn) -> bool { member.has_status(MembershipStatus::Confirmed) && (member.has_full_access() || CollectionUser::has_access_to_collection_by_user(col_id, &member.user_uuid, conn).await || ... -
A separate management-permission check exists and includes
managevalidation, but it is not used during authorization for the affected endpoints. src/db/models/collection.rs:516pub async fn is_manageable_by_user(&self, user_uuid: &UserId, conn: &DbConn) -> bool { let Some(member) = Membership::find_confirmed_by_user_and_org(user_uuid, &self.org_uuid, conn).await else { return false; }; if member.has_full_access() { return true; } ... -
The actual update and deletion endpoints only accept
ManagerHeadersand do not perform additionalmanagechecks. src/api/core/organizations.rs:608
async fn put_organization_collection_update(..., headers: ManagerHeaders, ...)
src/api/core/organizations.rs:890
async fn put_collection_users(..., headers: ManagerHeaders, ...)
src/api/core/organizations.rs:747
async fn delete_organization_collection(..., headers: ManagerHeaders, ...)
Preconditions
- The attacker is a Manager within the target organization.
- The attacker has access to the target collection (
assigned=true). - The attacker’s permission for that collection is
manage=false. - A valid API access token has been obtained.
Steps to Reproduce
-
Confirm that the attacker’s current permissions for the target collection include
<img width="2015" height="636" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/58ddc733-e37c-4766-a980-b1ea1918ceb4" />manage=false. -
As a control test, verify that update operations fail for collections the attacker cannot access.
<img width="2021" height="852" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d8699442-2dfc-4d73-8940-ec10f4a175f0" /> -
Confirm that update operations succeed for the target collection where
<img width="2013" height="690" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/33d9845d-d18e-456c-a58c-e780911347a9" />manage=false. -
Use
<img width="2018" height="488" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/da8c5246-cf2a-46c2-9a25-e99d907f852d" />PUT /collections/{col_id}/usersto setmanage=true, confirming that the attacker can escalate their own privileges. -
Verify that deletion of the collection succeeds despite the Manager lacking management rights.
<img width="2018" height="487" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a97c8fb2-4f97-4c2a-a90b-9d95dbde84fd" />
Required Minimum Privileges
- Organization Manager role (Owner/Admin privileges are not required)
- Works even with
access_all=false - Only access rights to the target collection are required (
manageprivilege is not required)
Attack Scenario
A restricted Manager (intended for read/use-only access) directly invokes the API to update collection settings, elevate their own privileges to manage=true, and even delete the collection.
This allows the user to bypass operational access restrictions and effectively gain administrator-equivalent control over the collection.
Potential Impact
- Confidentiality: Expansion of access scope through unauthorized privilege escalation and configuration changes.
- Integrity: Unauthorized modification of collection settings and assignments; potential disabling of access controls.
- Availability: Deletion of collections may disrupt business operations.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data. There is a low impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard