Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-h4hq-rgvh-wh27

HighCVSS 8.3 / 10
Published Mar 4, 2026·Last modified Mar 4, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

Testing confirmed that even when a Manager has manage=false for a given collection, they can still perform the following management operations as long as they have access to the collection:

  • PUT /api/organizations/<org_id>/collections/<col_id> succeeds (HTTP 200)
  • PUT /api/organizations/<org_id>/collections/<col_id>/users succeeds (HTTP 200)
  • DELETE /api/organizations/<org_id>/collections/<col_id> succeeds (HTTP 200)

Description

  • The Manager guard checks only whether the user can access the collection, not whether they have manage privileges. This check is directly applied to management endpoints. src/auth.rs:816

    
    if !Collection::can_access_collection(&headers.membership, &col_id, &conn).await {
        err_handler!("The current user isn't a manager for this collection")
    }
    
  • The can_access_collection function does not evaluate the manage flag. src/db/models/collection.rs:140

    
    pub async fn can_access_collection(member: &Membership, col_id: &CollectionId, conn: &DbConn) -> bool {
        member.has_status(MembershipStatus::Confirmed)
            && (member.has_full_access()
                || CollectionUser::has_access_to_collection_by_user(col_id, &member.user_uuid, conn).await
                || ...
    
  • A separate management-permission check exists and includes manage validation, but it is not used during authorization for the affected endpoints. src/db/models/collection.rs:516

    
    pub async fn is_manageable_by_user(&self, user_uuid: &UserId, conn: &DbConn) -> bool {
        let Some(member) = Membership::find_confirmed_by_user_and_org(user_uuid, &self.org_uuid, conn).await else {
            return false;
        };
        if member.has_full_access() {
            return true;
        }
        ...
    
  • The actual update and deletion endpoints only accept ManagerHeaders and do not perform additional manage checks. src/api/core/organizations.rs:608

  async fn put_organization_collection_update(..., headers: ManagerHeaders, ...)

src/api/core/organizations.rs:890

  async fn put_collection_users(..., headers: ManagerHeaders, ...)

src/api/core/organizations.rs:747

  async fn delete_organization_collection(..., headers: ManagerHeaders, ...)

Preconditions

  • The attacker is a Manager within the target organization.
  • The attacker has access to the target collection (assigned=true).
  • The attacker’s permission for that collection is manage=false.
  • A valid API access token has been obtained.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Confirm that the attacker’s current permissions for the target collection include manage=false.

    <img width="2015" height="636" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/58ddc733-e37c-4766-a980-b1ea1918ceb4" />
  2. As a control test, verify that update operations fail for collections the attacker cannot access.

    <img width="2021" height="852" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d8699442-2dfc-4d73-8940-ec10f4a175f0" />
  3. Confirm that update operations succeed for the target collection where manage=false.

    <img width="2013" height="690" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/33d9845d-d18e-456c-a58c-e780911347a9" />
  4. Use PUT /collections/{col_id}/users to set manage=true, confirming that the attacker can escalate their own privileges.

    <img width="2018" height="488" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/da8c5246-cf2a-46c2-9a25-e99d907f852d" />
  5. Verify that deletion of the collection succeeds despite the Manager lacking management rights.

    <img width="2018" height="487" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a97c8fb2-4f97-4c2a-a90b-9d95dbde84fd" />

Required Minimum Privileges

  • Organization Manager role (Owner/Admin privileges are not required)
  • Works even with access_all=false
  • Only access rights to the target collection are required (manage privilege is not required)

Attack Scenario

A restricted Manager (intended for read/use-only access) directly invokes the API to update collection settings, elevate their own privileges to manage=true, and even delete the collection.

This allows the user to bypass operational access restrictions and effectively gain administrator-equivalent control over the collection.

Potential Impact

  • Confidentiality: Expansion of access scope through unauthorized privilege escalation and configuration changes.
  • Integrity: Unauthorized modification of collection settings and assignments; potential disabling of access controls.
  • Availability: Deletion of collections may disrupt business operations.
Risk Scores
Base Score
8.3

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data. There is a low impact on the availability of the system.

Threat Intelligence
7.6

Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.

EPSS
0.29%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard