Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-gx4c-2hqx-cw2r
Vulnerability Details
File: backend/s3/s3.go
Lines: 1359-1380 (functions s3CheckRedirect / s3RedirectCrossesHost)
Root Cause
Commit e7b1eb774 (released in v1.74.3) added a CheckRedirect policy for
the S3 HTTP client whose purpose is to strip the X-Amz-Security-Token
header (the AWS STS session token) whenever a redirect chain "crosses a
host", so the token isn't forwarded to an unintended origin.
s3RedirectCrossesHost decides this purely by comparing url.URL.Host
(hostname[:port]); it never looks at url.URL.Scheme. A redirect that keeps
the exact same host:port but changes the scheme from https:// to http://
therefore compares as "same host" and X-Amz-Security-Token is not
stripped — it is sent again, this time over plaintext HTTP.
func s3RedirectCrossesHost(req *http.Request, via []*http.Request) bool {
if len(via) == 0 {
return false
}
host := via[0].URL.Host
for _, redirect := range via[1:] {
if redirect.URL.Host != host {
return true
}
}
return host != req.URL.Host
}
Attack Scenario
- The user configures an
s3remote (or--s3-endpointpointing at a self-hosted/third-party S3-compatible service) using temporary credentials that include an STSsession_token(common for assumed-role / CI / Kubernetes IRSA setups). - The configured endpoint responds to a request with a 3xx redirect to the
same host:port but with
http://instead ofhttps://(TLS-front misconfiguration, maintenance redirect, or a malicious/compromised storage provider trying to harvest the token). - rclone's S3 HTTP client follows the redirect and re-sends the request,
including
X-Amz-Security-Token, over the now-unencrypted connection to that same host. - Any passive observer on that now-plaintext network path can read the STS session token from the request headers.
Impact
Disclosure of the AWS STS session token (X-Amz-Security-Token) in
cleartext for the remainder of its validity window. This is the exact class
of leak that e7b1eb774 was written to close — it just doesn't cover the
scheme-downgrade axis of "crossing a host".
Vulnerable Code
func s3RedirectCrossesHost(req *http.Request, via []*http.Request) bool {
if len(via) == 0 {
return false
}
host := via[0].URL.Host
for _, redirect := range via[1:] {
if redirect.URL.Host != host {
return true
}
}
return host != req.URL.Host
}
Recommended Fix
Also compare URL.Scheme, so a scheme downgrade on the same host is treated
the same as a host change:
func s3RedirectCrossesHost(req *http.Request, via []*http.Request) bool {
if len(via) == 0 {
return false
}
scheme, host := via[0].URL.Scheme, via[0].URL.Host
for _, redirect := range via[1:] {
if redirect.URL.Host != host || redirect.URL.Scheme != scheme {
return true
}
}
return host != req.URL.Host || scheme != req.URL.Scheme
}
Verification
Added a unit test (backend/s3/redirect_scheme_test.go) that calls the real,
unmodified s3RedirectCrossesHost / s3CheckRedirect with an
https://bucket.example.com -> http://bucket.example.com redirect chain.
On unpatched code (commit 16091ce365, current master / v1.74.3):
s3RedirectCrossesHostreturnsfalses3CheckRedirectleavesX-Amz-Security-Token: SECRET-SESSION-TOKENintact on the outgoing (plaintext) request.
=== RUN TestSchemeDowngradeNotDetectedAsCrossHost
redirect_scheme_test.go:23: initial=https://bucket.example.com final=http://bucket.example.com s3RedirectCrossesHost=false
--- PASS: TestSchemeDowngradeNotDetectedAsCrossHost (0.00s)
After applying the one-line fix above (also adding scheme comparison), the
token is correctly stripped and all existing redirect tests
(TestClientRemovesSecurityTokenOnCrossHostRedirect,
TestClientDoesNotRestoreSecurityTokenAfterCrossHostRedirect,
TestClientKeepsSecurityTokenOnSameHostRedirect,
TestClientStopsAfterTenRedirects) continue to pass.
A minimal fix commit is ready and can be pushed to a private fork once this report is acknowledged.
The vulnerability can be exploited over a local network, such as Wi-Fi. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information.
Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.
Probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard