Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-gv83-gqw6-9j2c

MediumCVSS 4.8 / 10
Published Jul 6, 2026·Last modified Jul 6, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

The helmet middleware in gofiber/fiber never sets the Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS) response header, even when HSTSMaxAge is explicitly configured, because the condition check at helmet.go:67 uses c.Protocol() — which returns the HTTP protocol version string (e.g., "HTTP/1.1", "HTTP/2.0") — instead of c.Scheme() — which returns the URL scheme ("http" or "https"). Since c.Protocol() never equals "https" in any real deployment, the HSTS header is permanently disabled, defeating the security protection.

Details

Root cause: middleware/helmet/helmet.go, line 67:

if c.Protocol() == "https" && cfg.HSTSMaxAge != 0 {

c.Protocol() (defined at req.go:865-867) delegates to fasthttp.Request.Header.Protocol(), which returns the HTTP protocol version:

  • "HTTP/1.1" for HTTP/1.1 connections
  • "HTTP/2.0" for HTTP/2 connections

The correct method is c.Scheme() (defined at req.go:844-862), which returns:

  • "http" for plain HTTP connections
  • "https" for TLS connections

Since "HTTP/1.1" != "https" always evaluates to true, the entire HSTS block (lines 67-76) is dead code.

Note on test coverage: The existing helmet test (helmet_test.go) passes because it uses ctx.Request.Header.SetProtocol("https") to artificially force Protocol() to return "https". However, fasthttp.Request.Header.SetProtocol() sets the HTTP version field, and real HTTP requests never have protocol "https" — they have "HTTP/1.1" or "HTTP/2.0". The test is validating the wrong thing.

PoC

Clean-checkout maintainer-runnable recipe:

  1. Save the following as middleware/helmet/poc_hsts_test.go:
package helmet

import (
    "crypto/tls"
    "net/http/httptest"
    "testing"

    "github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3"
)

func Test_PoC_HSTS_NeverSet(t *testing.T) {
    app := fiber.New()
    app.Use(New(Config{
        HSTSMaxAge: 31536000,
    }))
    app.Get("/", func(c fiber.Ctx) error {
        return c.SendString("ok")
    })

    // Simulate HTTPS connection
    req := httptest.NewRequest(fiber.MethodGet, "/", nil)
    req.TLS = &tls.ConnectionState{}

    resp, _ := app.Test(req)
    hsts := resp.Header.Get("Strict-Transport-Security")

    if hsts == "" {
        t.Log("BUG CONFIRMED: HSTS header not set. c.Protocol() returns 'HTTP/1.1', not 'https'")
        t.Log("Fix: change c.Protocol() == 'https' to c.Scheme() == 'https' on line 67")
    }
}
  1. Run: go test -run Test_PoC_HSTS_NeverSet -v ./middleware/helmet/

Expected vulnerable output:

=== RUN   Test_PoC_HSTS_NeverSet
    BUG CONFIRMED: HSTS header not set. c.Protocol() returns 'HTTP/1.1', not 'https'
    Fix: change c.Protocol() == 'https' to c.Scheme() == 'https' on line 67
--- PASS: Test_PoC_HSTS_NeverSet

Expected output after fix:

=== RUN   Test_PoC_HSTS_NeverSet
--- PASS: Test_PoC_HSTS_NeverSet
    (HSTS header is set: "max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains")

Observed output from this environment (commit ee98695f):

=== RUN   Test_PoC_HSTS_NeverSet
    poc_hsts_test.go:39: HSTS header value: ""
    poc_hsts_test.go:42: BUG CONFIRMED: HSTS header is NOT set even over TLS
    poc_hsts_test.go:43: Root cause: helmet.go:67 uses c.Protocol() which returns HTTP version
    poc_hsts_test.go:44: c.Protocol() returns 'HTTP/1.1' not 'https'
    poc_hsts_test.go:45: Fix: use c.Scheme() == 'https' instead of c.Protocol() == 'https'
--- PASS: Test_PoC_HSTS_NeverSet

Negative/control case: With HSTSMaxAge: 0 (default), HSTS is correctly not set (this is expected behavior, not a bug).

Cleanup: Remove poc_hsts_test.go after verification.

Impact

The HSTS header is never applied in production, leaving all users vulnerable to:

  • SSL stripping attacks: An active network attacker can downgrade HTTPS connections to HTTP, intercepting traffic between the client and server.
  • Protocol downgrade: Without HSTS, browsers will silently accept HTTP connections to the site, even if the site supports HTTPS.
  • Cookie theft over HTTP: Session cookies without the Secure flag will be sent over HTTP if the user is tricked into an HTTP connection.

This affects any application that:

  1. Uses the helmet middleware
  2. Configures HSTSMaxAge > 0 expecting HSTS protection
  3. Serves traffic over HTTPS

The vulnerability requires an active MITM attacker on the network path, which is realistic in public Wi-Fi, corporate networks, and ISP-level scenarios.

Suggested remediation

In middleware/helmet/helmet.go, line 67, replace c.Protocol() with c.Scheme():

// Before (broken):
if c.Protocol() == "https" && cfg.HSTSMaxAge != 0 {

// After (fixed):
if c.Scheme() == "https" && cfg.HSTSMaxAge != 0 {

Additionally, update the existing test to use a realistic TLS simulation instead of SetProtocol("https"):

// Before (artificial - sets HTTP version to "https" which never happens in practice):
ctx.Request.Header.SetProtocol("https")

// After (realistic - simulates TLS connection):
ctx.RequestCtx().Request.Header.SetProtocol("HTTP/1.1")
ctx.RequestCtx().TLS = &tls.ConnectionState{}

Regression test: Add a test case that verifies HSTS is set when req.TLS is non-nil and HSTSMaxAge > 0, without using SetProtocol.

Risk Scores
Base Score
4.8

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data.

Threat Intelligence
4.4

Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.

EPSS
0.18%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard