Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-gp2f-7wcm-5fhx
No affected components available
Summary
The SSRF validation in Craft CMS’s GraphQL Asset mutation performs DNS resolution separately from the HTTP request. This Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) vulnerability enables DNS rebinding attacks, where an attacker’s DNS server returns different IP addresses for validation compared to the actual request.
This is a bypass of the security fix for CVE-2025-68437 (GHSA-x27p-wfqw-hfcc) that allows access to all blocked IPs, not just IPv6 endpoints.
Severity
Bypass of cloud metadata SSRF protection for all blocked IPs
Required Permissions
Exploitation requires GraphQL schema permissions for:
- Edit assets in the
<VolumeName>volume - Create assets in the
<VolumeName>volume
These permissions may be granted to:
- Authenticated users with appropriate GraphQL schema access
- Public Schema (if misconfigured with write permissions)
Technical Details
Vulnerable Code Flow
The code at src/gql/resolvers/mutations/Asset.php performs two separate DNS lookups:
// VALIDATION PHASE: First DNS resolution at time T1
private function validateHostname(string $url): bool
{
$hostname = parse_url($url, PHP_URL_HOST);
$ip = gethostbyname($hostname); // DNS Lookup #1 - Returns safe IP
if (in_array($ip, [
'169.254.169.254', // AWS, GCP, Azure IMDS
'169.254.170.2', // AWS ECS metadata
'100.100.100.200', // Alibaba Cloud
'192.0.0.192', // Oracle Cloud
])) {
return false; // Check passes - IP looks safe
}
return true;
}
// ... time gap between validation and request ...
// REQUEST PHASE: Second DNS resolution at time T2 (inside Guzzle)
$response = $client->get($url); // DNS Lookup #2 - Guzzle resolves DNS AGAIN
// Now returns 169.254.169.254!
Root Cause
Two separate DNS lookups occur:
- Validation:
gethostbyname()invalidateHostname() - Request: Guzzle's internal DNS resolution via libcurl
An attacker controlling a DNS server can return different IPs for each query.
Bypass Mechanism
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Attacker's DNS Server: evil.attacker.com |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Query 1 (Validation - T1): |
| Request: A record for evil.attacker.com |
| Response: 1.2.3.4 (safe IP, TTL: 0) |
| Result: Validation PASSES |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Query 2 (Guzzle Request - T2): |
| Request: A record for evil.attacker.com |
| Response: 169.254.169.254 (metadata IP, TTL: 0) |
| Result: Request goes to blocked IP -> CREDENTIALS STOLEN |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Target Endpoints via DNS Rebinding
DNS rebinding allows access to all blocked IPs:
| Target | Rebind To | Impact |
|--------|-----------|--------|
| AWS IMDS | 169.254.169.254 | IAM credentials, instance identity |
| AWS ECS | 169.254.170.2 | Container credentials |
| GCP Metadata | 169.254.169.254 | Service account tokens |
| Azure Metadata | 169.254.169.254 | Managed identity tokens |
| Alibaba Cloud | 100.100.100.200 | Instance credentials |
| Oracle Cloud | 192.0.0.192 | Instance metadata |
| Internal Services | 127.0.0.1, 10.x.x.x | Internal APIs, databases |
Attack Scenario
- Attacker sets up DNS server with alternating responses
- Attacker sends mutation with
url: "http://evil.attacker.com/latest/meta-data/" - First DNS query returns safe IP (e.g.,
1.2.3.4) → validation passes - Second DNS query returns metadata IP (
169.254.169.254) → request to metadata - Attacker retrieves credentials from ANY cloud provider
- Attacker can now achieve code execution by creating new instances with their SSH key
Remediation
Fix: DNS Pinning with CURLOPT_RESOLVE
Pin the DNS resolution - use the same resolved IP for both validation and request:
private function validateHostname(string $url): bool
{
$hostname = parse_url($url, PHP_URL_HOST);
// Resolve once
$ip = gethostbyname($hostname);
// Validate the resolved IP
if (in_array($ip, [
'169.254.169.254', '169.254.170.2',
'100.100.100.200', '192.0.0.192',
])) {
return false;
}
// Store for later use
$this->pinnedDNS[$hostname] = $ip;
return true;
}
// When making the request - CRITICAL: Use pinned IP
protected function makeRequest(string $url): ResponseInterface
{
$hostname = parse_url($url, PHP_URL_HOST);
$ip = $this->pinnedDNS[$hostname] ?? null;
$options = [];
if ($ip) {
// Force Guzzle/curl to use the SAME IP we validated
$options['curl'] = [
CURLOPT_RESOLVE => [
"$hostname:80:$ip",
"$hostname:443:$ip"
]
];
}
return $this->client->get($url, $options);
}
Alternative: Single Resolution with Immediate Use
// Resolve to IP and use IP directly in URL
$ip = gethostbyname($hostname);
if (in_array($ip, $blockedIPs)) {
return false;
}
// Make request directly to IP with Host header
$client->get("http://$ip" . parse_url($url, PHP_URL_PATH), [
'headers' => [
'Host' => $hostname
]
]);
Additional Mitigations
| Mitigation | Description | |------------|-------------| | DNS Pinning (CURLOPT_RESOLVE) | Force same IP for validation and request | | Single IP-based request | Use resolved IP directly in URL | | Implement IMDSv2 | Requires token header (infrastructure-level) | | Network egress filtering | Block metadata IPs at network level |
Resources
- https://github.com/craftcms/cms/commit/a4cf3fb63bba3249cf1e2882b18a2d29e77a8575
- GHSA-x27p-wfqw-hfcc - Original SSRF vulnerability (CVE-2025-68437)
- DNSrebinder - Lightweight Python DNS server for testing DNS rebinding vulnerabilities; responds with legitimate IP for first N queries, then rebinds to target IP
- Singularity DNS Rebinding Tool
- rbndr DNS Rebinding Service
- DNS Rebinding Attacks Explained
- CURLOPT_RESOLVE Documentation
- OWASP SSRF Prevention Cheat Sheet
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.
Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard