Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-g9jj-cgmh-9f38
org.mariadb.jdbc/mariadb-java-clientorg.mariadb.jdbc/mariadb-java-clientorg.mariadb.jdbc/mariadb-java-clientSummary
When a Java application connects with sslMode=verify-full (or verify-ca) and a password but does not pin a server certificate, Connector/J deliberately accepts an untrusted/self-signed certificate at the TLS layer (the "MITM-proof without a CA" feature) and proves the server's identity afterwards by binding the certificate fingerprint into the authentication exchange. That fingerprint enforcement is applied to the OK-packet and auth-switch paths but not to the initial-handshake path. An active man-in-the-middle that presents a self-signed certificate, claims to be MariaDB, and names the initial authentication plugin mysql_clear_password receives the victim's database password in cleartext, before any fingerprint/identity check runs. The connection is torn down a moment later, but the credential is already gone.
Details
For sslMode=verify-full/verify-ca with a password and no serverSslCert/trustStore, the connector falls back to an ephemeral trust manager (default fallbackToSystemTrustStore=true) that accepts any non-expired certificate at the TLS layer and records its fingerprint. Identity is then meant to be enforced via that fingerprint.
The enforcement guard is present on two of the three paths, the OK-packet fingerprint check and the auth-switch handler (where the clear-password plugin is only allowed when the fingerprint is already verified). It is absent on the initial-handshake send: HandshakeResponse.encode() builds the mysql_clear_password response after checking only that SSL is enabled, never consulting the recorded fingerprint, sslMode, or whether the plugin is MITM-proof. By that point the connector already knows the certificate was self-signed. The clear-password plugin does not declare itself MITM-proof (it inherits the safe default), which confirms it is meant to be refused on an unverified certificate; the initial-handshake path simply never consults that flag. The initial path also bypasses restrictedAuth.
Impact
An active man-in-the-middle steals the full cleartext database password of any Java application using Connector/J with sslMode=verify-full/verify-ca plus a password and no pinned certificate, the configuration documented as the easy, secure default. With the captured credentials the attacker can take over the database account and read or modify all data that account is authorized for. The victim takes no unusual action; the developer explicitly enabled TLS verification expecting exactly this protection.
Patches
Fixed in 2.7.14, 3.3.5, 3.4.3, and 3.5.9. Upgrade to the patched release on your branch (3.5.x → 3.5.9, 3.4.x → 3.4.3, 3.0/3.1/3.2/3.3.x → 3.3.5, 2.x → 2.7.14). The fix applies the same certFingerprint != null && !isMitMProof() guard to the initial-handshake path before writing the auth response, refusing to send a mysql_clear_password (or any non-MITM-proof) response on an as-yet-unverified certificate, matching the auth-switch path.
Workarounds
If you cannot upgrade immediately, pin the server certificate (serverSslCert= the real CA / server cert). With a pinned certificate the self-signed certificate of a man-in-the-middle is rejected at the TLS layer before any password is transmitted.
Credit
Reported by haaahaaahiihiiii
Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.
Drag and drop some file here, or click to select
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard