Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-g9g7-5cgw-6v28
No affected components available
Summary
In the russh client keyboard-interactive authentication path, a malicious SSH server could send a USERAUTH_INFO_REQUEST with an attacker-controlled prompt count, and the client would use that raw count directly in Vec::with_capacity(...) before validating that enough prompt data was actually present in the packet.
This is a client-side denial-of-service / resource-exhaustion issue on the keyboard-interactive auth path.
Details
The vulnerable code path is in:
russh/src/client/encrypted.rs
When the client is in CurrentRequest::KeyboardInteractive state and receives SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_INFO_REQUEST, it parses:
nameinstructionslanguage tagn_prompts
Before the fix, the code then did:
let n_prompts = map_err!(u32::decode(&mut r))?;
let mut prompts = Vec::with_capacity(n_prompts.try_into().unwrap_or(0));
That means a malicious server could advertise an enormous n_prompts value even if the packet contained no prompt bodies at all.
The fix rejects inconsistent prompt counts before allocating:
let n_prompts = map_err!(u32::decode(&mut r))?;
let max_prompts = r.remaining_len() / 5;
let n_prompts = n_prompts as usize;
if n_prompts > max_prompts {
return Err(crate::Error::Inconsistent.into());
}
let mut prompts = Vec::with_capacity(n_prompts);
Each prompt needs at least 4 bytes of string length plus 1 byte of echo flag, so remaining_len() / 5 is a safe upper bound. If the declared count exceeds what the packet can actually contain, the packet is malformed and is now rejected instead of being silently truncated.
The tester did not find a same-class server-side bug in the reciprocal USERAUTH_INFO_RESPONSE path. The server already bounds the response count by remaining packet length before allocating.
Affected package and versions:
- package:
russh - earliest affected stable:
0.37.0 - confirmed affected current release:
0.60.2
The tester does not believe this issue affects the other crates in this workspace (russh-config, russh-cryptovec, pageant, or russh-util).
PoC
An in-tree regression test was added:
client::tests::oversized_keyboard_interactive_prompt_count_is_rejected
The test builds a client session in WaitingAuthRequest(KeyboardInteractive) state, feeds it a synthetic USERAUTH_INFO_REQUEST packet with:
- normal
name - normal
instructions - empty language tag
n_prompts = u32::MAX- no prompt bodies
On the fixed code, the client rejects the packet with Error::Inconsistent and does not emit a reply to the caller.
For old-code impact verification, the pre-fix path was also checked separately with a constrained-memory repro. On unfixed upstream/main, the same malformed packet attempted a very large allocation and failed with:
memory allocation of 137438953440 bytes failed
Relevant verification commands:
cargo test -p russh oversized_keyboard_interactive_prompt_count_is_rejected -- --nocapture
cargo test -p russh --lib --no-default-features --features ring oversized_keyboard_interactive_prompt_count_is_rejected -- --nocapture
Impact
Suggested CVSS v3.1:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H- Score:
6.5
Reasoning:
AV:N: reached by a malicious SSH server over the networkAC:L: the packet format is straightforwardPR:N: no prior authentication requiredUI:R: the victim must initiate a connection and proceed into keyboard-interactive authC:N,I:N: Confidentiality or integrity impact were not demonstratedA:H: the server can drive a very large allocation attempt in the client auth path, which can abort or exhaust client-side resources depending on allocator and platform behavior
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. The attacker needs the user to perform some action, like clicking a link. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard