Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-g9c2-gf25-3x67

HighCVSS 7.1 / 10
Published Apr 1, 2026·Last modified Apr 6, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

@tinacms/graphql uses string-based path containment checks in FilesystemBridge:

  • path.resolve(path.join(baseDir, filepath))
  • startsWith(resolvedBase + path.sep)

That blocks plain ../ traversal, but it does not resolve symlink or junction targets. If a symlink/junction already exists under the allowed content root, a path like content/posts/pivot/owned.md is still considered "inside" the base even though the real filesystem target can be outside it.

As a result, FilesystemBridge.get(), put(), delete(), and glob() can operate on files outside the intended root.

Details

The current bridge validation is:

function assertWithinBase(filepath: string, baseDir: string): string {
  const resolvedBase = path.resolve(baseDir);
  const resolved = path.resolve(path.join(baseDir, filepath));
  if (
    resolved !== resolvedBase &&
    !resolved.startsWith(resolvedBase + path.sep)
  ) {
    throw new Error(
      `Path traversal detected: "${filepath}" escapes the base directory`
    );
  }
  return resolved;
}

But the bridge then performs real filesystem I/O on the resulting path:

public async get(filepath: string) {
  const resolved = assertWithinBase(filepath, this.outputPath);
  return (await fs.readFile(resolved)).toString();
}

public async put(filepath: string, data: string, basePathOverride?: string) {
  const basePath = basePathOverride || this.outputPath;
  const resolved = assertWithinBase(filepath, basePath);
  await fs.outputFile(resolved, data);
}

public async delete(filepath: string) {
  const resolved = assertWithinBase(filepath, this.outputPath);
  await fs.remove(resolved);
}

This is a classic realpath gap:

  1. validation checks the lexical path string
  2. the filesystem follows the link target during I/O
  3. the actual target can be outside the intended root

This is reachable from Tina's GraphQL/local database flow. The resolver builds a validated path from user-controlled relativePath, but that validation is also string-based:

const realPath = path.join(collection.path, relativePath);
this.validatePath(realPath, collection, relativePath);

Database write and delete operations then call the bridge:

await this.bridge.put(normalizedPath, stringifiedFile);
...
await this.bridge.delete(normalizedPath);

Local Reproduction

This was verified llocally with a real junction on Windows, which exercises the same failure mode as a symlink on Unix-like systems.

Test layout:

  • content root: D:\bugcrowd\tinacms\temp\junction-repro4
  • allowed collection path: content/posts
  • junction inside collection: content/posts/pivot -> D:\bugcrowd\tinacms\temp\junction-repro4\outside
  • file outside content root: outside\secret.txt

Tina's current path-validation logic was applied and used to perform bridge-style read/write operations through the junction.

Observed result:

{
  "graphqlBridge": {
    "collectionPath": "content/posts",
    "requestedRelativePath": "pivot/owned.md",
    "validatedRealPath": "content\\posts\\pivot\\owned.md",
    "bridgeResolvedPath": "D:\\bugcrowd\\tinacms\\temp\\junction-repro4\\content\\posts\\pivot\\owned.md",
    "bridgeRead": "TOP_SECRET_FROM_OUTSIDE\\r\\n",
    "outsideGraphqlWriteExists": true,
    "outsideGraphqlWriteContents": "GRAPHQL_ESCAPE"
  }
}

That is the critical point:

  • the path was accepted as inside content/posts
  • the bridge read outside\secret.txt
  • the bridge wrote outside\owned.md

So the current containment check does not actually constrain filesystem access to the configured content root once a link exists inside that tree.

Impact

  • Arbitrary file read/write outside the configured content root
  • Potential delete outside the configured content root via the same assertWithinBase() gap in delete()
  • Breaks the assumptions of the recent path-traversal fixes because only lexical traversal is blocked
  • Practical attack chains where the content tree contains a committed symlink/junction, or an attacker can cause one to exist before issuing GraphQL/content operations

The exact network exploitability depends on how the application exposes Tina's GraphQL/content operations, but the underlying bridge bug is real and independently security-relevant.

Recommended Fix

The containment check needs to compare canonical filesystem paths, not just string-normalized paths.

For example:

  1. resolve the base with fs.realpath()
  2. resolve the candidate path's parent with fs.realpath()
  3. reject any request whose real target path escapes the real base
  4. for write operations, carefully canonicalize the nearest existing parent directory before creating the final file

In short: use realpath-aware containment checks for every filesystem sink, not path.resolve(...).startsWith(...) alone.

Resources

  • packages/@tinacms/graphql/src/database/bridge/filesystem.ts
  • packages/@tinacms/graphql/src/database/index.ts
  • packages/@tinacms/graphql/src/resolver/index.ts
Risk Scores
Base Score
7.1

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data. There is a low impact on the availability of the system.

Threat Intelligence
6.5

Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.

EPSS
0.37%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard