Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-g6xm-f9xp-qq35
Details
Affected versions and vulnerable location
- Confirmed present on default branch
mainat HEAD0089c89c94753bebbec12b956c07a1cd38740379. - Crate version at HEAD:
0.62.4. - Vulnerable locations on current default branch:
russh/src/server/mod.rs:91(pub max_auth_attempts: usize)russh/src/server/mod.rs:121(defaultmax_auth_attempts: 10)russh/src/server/encrypted.rs:89(USERAUTH_REQUESTdispatch into auth handler path)russh/src/server/encrypted.rs:98(self.common.auth_attempts += 1)russh/src/server/encrypted.rs:53(only runtime read ofauth_attempts, used for initial reject timing, not attempt limiting)
- Default-branch history check did not show a newer merged commit adding enforcement against
config.max_auth_attempts.
Reachability trace verified
- Entry point: exported server API
server::run_streaminrussh/src/server/mod.rs:1049. - Session run loop in
russh/src/server/session.rsprocesses incoming packets and callsreply(...)(server/session.rs:725). replyforwards encrypted packets tosession.server_read_encrypted(...)(server/mod.rs:1221).server_read_encryptedroutesUSERAUTH_REQUESTtoenc.server_read_auth_request(...)(server/encrypted.rs:89).- On each request,
self.common.auth_attempts += 1executes (server/encrypted.rs:98). - No comparison against
self.common.config.max_auth_attemptsis present in this runtime flow.
PoC
Reproduction steps and observed output
I did not run a full server process in this environment because Rust tooling is unavailable. I verified the issue from source and command output on the audited tree.
- Show where
max_auth_attemptsappears:
rtk rg -n "max_auth_attempts" .scratch/russh/russh/src/server/mod.rs .scratch/russh/russh/src/server/encrypted.rs .scratch/russh/russh/src/server/session.rs
Observed:
.scratch/russh/russh/src/server/mod.rs:91: pub max_auth_attempts: usize,
.scratch/russh/russh/src/server/mod.rs:121: max_auth_attempts: 10,
.scratch/russh/russh/src/server/mod.rs:148: .field("max_auth_attempts", &self.max_auth_attempts)
- Show runtime auth-attempt handling:
rtk rg -n "auth_attempts == 0|auth_attempts \\+= 1" .scratch/russh/russh/src/server/encrypted.rs
Observed:
53: let initial_none_rejection_wait_until = if self.common.auth_attempts == 0 {
98: self.common.auth_attempts += 1;
- Show production entrypoint-to-auth path references:
rtk rg -n "pub async fn run_stream|match reply\\(|server_read_encrypted\\(|server_read_auth_request\\(" .scratch/russh/russh/src/server/mod.rs .scratch/russh/russh/src/server/session.rs .scratch/russh/russh/src/server/encrypted.rs
Observed:
.scratch/russh/russh/src/server/encrypted.rs:89: enc.server_read_auth_request(
.scratch/russh/russh/src/server/session.rs:725: match reply(&mut self, &mut handler, &mut pkt).await {
.scratch/russh/russh/src/server/mod.rs:1049:pub async fn run_stream<H, R>(
.scratch/russh/russh/src/server/mod.rs:1221: session.server_read_encrypted(handler, pkt).await
- Toolchain check:
cargo --version
Observed:
/bin/bash: line 1: cargo: command not found
Impact
Attacker model
- Attacker: unauthenticated remote client with TCP reachability to a russh-backed SSH service.
- Preconditions: deployer expects
server::Config.max_auth_attemptsto cap attempts. - Impact: repeated
USERAUTH_REQUESTattempts continue for a single connection beyond configured limit, increasing online guessing opportunity and backend auth workload.
Suggested fix
Enforce max_auth_attempts in the USERAUTH_REQUEST branch before invoking auth-method handlers, and fail closed once threshold is reached.
Concrete patch direction in russh/src/server/encrypted.rs:
if self.common.config.max_auth_attempts > 0
&& self.common.auth_attempts >= self.common.config.max_auth_attempts
{
self.common.disconnect(
Disconnect::NoMoreAuthMethodsAvailable,
"Too many authentication attempts",
"",
)?;
return Ok(());
}
How it was found and a note on tooling
The researcher synthesized three lens outputs, then revalidated each claim against current main: source presence and commit history, advisory overlap checks in both GitHub advisories and OSV, entrypoint-to-sink reachability, attacker-model realism, and execution-claim integrity. The researcher used gh, git, rg, and direct source inspection under .scratch/russh. Because Rust tooling is unavailable in this worker, this report is intentionally marked source-only.
AI assistance was used while investigating this and while drafting this report. The finding was verified by reading the cited code at HEAD. The vulnerability was not executed it, and that limit is stated plainly above rather than left implied.
Credits: arpitjain099.
Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.
Drag and drop some file here, or click to select
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information.
Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard