Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-g2p6-hh5v-7hfm
No affected components available
Impact
Poseidon V1 (PoseidonSponge) accepts variable-length inputs without injective padding. When a caller provides fewer inputs than the sponge rate (inputs.len() < T - 1), unused rate positions are implicitly zero-filled. This allows trivial hash collisions: for any input vector [m1, ..., mk] hashed with a sponge of rate > k, hash([m1, ..., mk]) equals hash([m1, ..., mk, 0]) because both produce identical pre-permutation states.
This affects any use of PoseidonSponge or poseidon_hash where the number of inputs is less than T - 1 (e.g., hashing 1 input with T=3).
Poseidon2 (Poseidon2Sponge) is not affected — it encodes the input length in the capacity element (IV = input_len << 64), making different-length inputs produce distinct states.
Patches
Fixed by enforcing inputs.len() == RATE in PoseidonSponge::compute_hash, matching circom's invariant that nInputs always equals T - 1. Users should upgrade to the next release containing this fix.
Workarounds
If upgrading is not immediately possible:
- Ensure callers always use
T = inputs.len() + 1(full-rate), which is how circom uses Poseidon. For example, to hash 2 inputs, useT=3; to hash 1 input, useT=2. Never use a sponge with more rate capacity than the number of inputs. - Alternatively, migrate to
Poseidon2Sponge, which is safe for variable-length inputs due to its length-encoding IV.
References
- circom Poseidon implementation — reference implementation where
nInputsdeterminesT - Poseidon paper — Section 4 discusses sponge construction and padding requirements
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard