Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-g27h-8qhm-6pff
Summary
A worksheet containing <mergeCell ref=""/> makes mergeCellsParser leave the cached rectangle empty, and cellInRange then indexes that empty slice without a length check. Every non-streaming cell API panics with index out of range [0] with length 0 on the first cell read after opening the file.
Where it is
cell.go, cellInRange
func cellInRange(cell, ref []int) bool {
return cell[0] >= ref[0] && cell[0] <= ref[2] && cell[1] >= ref[1] && cell[1] <= ref[3]
}
ref is indexed at four positions with no bounds check.
The caller that can hand it an empty slice, mergeCellsParser
if ref := ws.MergeCells.Cells[i].Ref; len(ws.MergeCells.Cells[i].rect) == 0 && ref != "" {
if strings.Count(ref, ":") != 1 {
ref += ":" + ref
}
rect, err := rangeRefToCoordinates(ref)
if err != nil {
return cell, err
}
_ = sortCoordinates(rect)
ws.MergeCells.Cells[i].rect = rect
}
if cellInRange([]int{col, row}, ws.MergeCells.Cells[i].rect) {
The ref != "" condition means an empty ref skips the block that populates rect, so rect stays nil. The cellInRange call on the next line is unconditional and receives that nil slice.
Ref comes straight from xl/worksheets/sheetN.xml through encoding/xml, so an empty string is entirely attacker-controlled.
Impact
Any consumer that opens an untrusted workbook and reads a cell panics. The loop scans every merged cell, so any cell reference triggers it, not a specific one. Affected entry points include GetCellValue, GetCellType, GetCellFormula, SetCellValue and the in-cell branch of GetPictures. The streaming Rows and GetRows use the SAX path and do not go through this parser, and GetMergeCells routes through Rect() which errors cleanly, which is probably why this has not surfaced before.
There is no option or flag involved; opening the file succeeds and the panic fires on the first cell read. Unless the caller wraps the call in recover() it takes the process down.
This is a regression. Commit a34c81e (PR #1500, 2023-03-20) replaced checkCellInRangeRef, whose len(rng) != 2 guard returned cleanly for an empty ref, with the cached-rect fast path above, and the guard did not come along. git merge-base --is-ancestor confirms that commit is an ancestor of v2.11.0, so released versions are affected as well as HEAD.
Proof of concept
Executed at HEAD.
Build a minimal xlsx whose xl/worksheets/sheet1.xml contains:
<mergeCells count="1"><mergeCell ref=""></mergeCell></mergeCells>
Then:
f, err := excelize.OpenReader(bytes.NewReader(data))
if err != nil { t.Fatal(err) }
_, _ = f.GetCellValue("Sheet1", "A1")
Observed, running against the repository at HEAD:
panic: runtime error: index out of range [0] with length 0
excelize.cellInRange cell.go:1691
excelize.(*xlsxWorksheet).mergeCellsParser cell.go:1660
excelize.(*File).getCellStringFunc cell.go:1512
excelize.(*File).GetCellValue cell.go:72
OpenReader itself returns no error; the file is 1656 bytes. A1, B1 and A2 all reproduce it.
For context on how targeted this is, I ran a battery of 38 crafted files covering data validation, conditional formatting, cell and row references, number formats, cols, hyperlinks, dimension, shared strings and tables. Only the empty-ref merge cell panicked; everything else returned a clean error. The other parsing paths look well guarded.
Suggested fix
Skip the entry when the rectangle is empty, before the range test:
if len(ws.MergeCells.Cells[i].rect) == 0 {
continue
}
Credit goes to arpitjain099.
Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.
Drag and drop some file here, or click to select
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. The attacker needs the user to perform some action, like clicking a link. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard