Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-fvwq-45qv-xvhv

MediumCVSS 6.9 / 10
Published Mar 11, 2026·Last modified Mar 13, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

The fix for CVE-2025-35939 in craftcms/cms introduced a strip_tags() call in src/web/User.php to sanitize return URLs before they are stored in the session. However, strip_tags() only removes HTML tags (angle brackets) -- it does not inspect or filter URL schemes. Payloads like javascript:alert(document.cookie) contain no HTML tags and pass through strip_tags() completely unmodified, enabling reflected XSS when the return URL is rendered in an href attribute.

Details

The patched code in is:

public function setReturnUrl($url): void
{
    parent::setReturnUrl(strip_tags($url));
}

strip_tags() removes HTML tags (e.g., <script>, <img>) from a string, but it is not a URL sanitizer. When the sanitized return URL is subsequently rendered in an href attribute context (e.g., <a href="{{ returnUrl }}">), the following dangerous payloads survive strip_tags() completely unmodified:

  1. javascript: protocol URLs -- javascript:alert(document.cookie) contains no HTML tags, so strip_tags() returns it verbatim. When placed in an href, clicking the link executes the JavaScript.

  2. data: URIs -- data:text/html;base64,PHNjcmlwdD5hbGVydCgxKTwvc2NyaXB0Pg== uses Base64 encoding and contains no tags at all, bypassing strip_tags() entirely.

  3. Protocol-relative URLs -- //evil.com/steal contains no tags and is passed through unchanged. When rendered as an href, the browser resolves it relative to the current page’s protocol, redirecting the user to an attacker-controlled domain.

The core issue is that strip_tags() operates on HTML syntax (angle brackets) while the threat model here requires URL scheme validation. These are fundamentally different security concerns.

Impact

Reflected XSS via crafted return URL. An attacker constructs a malicious link such as https://target.example.com/craft/?returnUrl=javascript:alert(document.cookie) and sends it to a victim. The attack flow is:

  1. Victim clicks the link, visiting the Craft CMS site.
  2. The application calls setReturnUrl() with the attacker-controlled value.
  3. strip_tags() processes the URL but finds no HTML tags -- it passes through unchanged.
  4. The URL is stored in the session and later rendered in an href attribute (e.g., a "Return" or "Continue" link).
  5. When the victim clicks that link, javascript:alert(document.cookie) executes in the context of the Craft CMS origin.

This enables:

  • Session hijacking via cookie theft (document.cookie)
  • Data exfiltration via fetch() to an attacker-controlled server
  • Phishing by redirecting to a lookalike domain (protocol-relative URL)
  • CSRF by performing actions on behalf of the authenticated user
Risk Scores
Base Score
6.9

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.

Threat Intelligence
2.7

Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.

EPSS
0.18%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard