Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-fr8x-3vfx-f45h

HighCVSS 7.7 / 10
Published May 5, 2026·Last modified May 8, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

attachments: pocs.zip

Submodule names coming from .gitmodules are exposed as unvalidated names and are later reused to derive the submodule git directory as:

<superproject common_dir>/modules/<submodule name>

Because the submodule name is joined directly as a filesystem path component, a name such as ../../../escaped-target.git escapes .git/modules after normalization. The current implementation then uses that escaped path in both state() and open().

The updated PoC demonstrates the real sink, not just string construction:

  • state() reports repository_exists=true for the traversed path;
  • open() returns a repository whose normalized common_dir() matches the attacker-chosen repository outside .git/modules.

Root cause analysis

The relevant flow is:

  1. gix-submodule/src/access.rs exposes unvalidated submodule names from configuration.
  2. gix/src/submodule/mod.rs derives the git directory by doing common_dir().join("modules").join(name) with no confinement check.
  3. gix/src/submodule/mod.rs uses that derived path during state resolution and repository opening.

There is no normalization-and-confinement step between “submodule name from configuration” and “filesystem path used for repository existence checks / open.” As a result, traversal segments in the submodule name directly influence which repository path is inspected and opened.

Reproduce steps

Use the attached PoC zip that contains the pocs/ workspace.

  1. Unzip the PoC archive.

  2. Enter pocs/F002.

  3. Run:

    cargo run --quiet
    
  4. Compare the output with pocs/F002/result.txt.

Key outputs are:

  • submodule_name=../../../escaped-target.git
  • derived_git_dir_raw=.../.git/modules/../../../escaped-target.git
  • derived_git_dir_normalized=.../artifacts/escaped-target.git
  • escaped_target=.../artifacts/escaped-target.git
  • repository_exists=true
  • submodule_opened=true
  • opened_common_dir_normalized=.../artifacts/escaped-target.git
  • normalized_git_dir_matches_target=true
  • opened_common_dir_matches_target=true
  • target_outside_modules_root=true

These outputs show that gitoxide is not only constructing a traversable path string. It is actually using the escaped path for repository existence checks and for opening a repository object.

Impact

Confirmed impact:

  • a malicious submodule name can redirect submodule state inspection away from .git/modules/<name> to an attacker-chosen repository path outside .git/modules;
  • Submodule::state() can report repository existence for the wrong repository;
  • Submodule::open() can return a repository object backed by that attacker-chosen path.

This is best described as a path-traversal / repository-confusion issue in submodule repository resolution.

This report does not claim command execution from this behavior alone. The demonstrated impact is repository redirection: callers that enumerate, inspect, or operate on submodules can be steered into using the wrong repository.

Recommended fix

Two complementary fixes are advisable:

  1. do not reuse raw submodule names as filesystem path fragments;
    • either use a validated/sanitized name for filesystem derivation,
    • or derive the storage path from a safe identifier instead of the user-controlled name;
  2. add an explicit confinement check after path derivation;
    • normalize or canonicalize the candidate path,
    • verify that the result stays under <common_dir>/modules,
    • reject names that contain traversal segments, path separators, or any representation that can escape the modules root.

In short, submodule names may remain opaque configuration identifiers, but they should not be treated as trusted filesystem subpaths.

Risk Scores
Base Score
7.7

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.

Threat Intelligence
6.6

Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.

EPSS
N/A

Probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard