Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-cw6x-m8jw-qmrh

MediumCVSS 5.3 / 10
Published Sep 2, 2026·Last modified Sep 2, 2026
Affected Components(1)
PyPI logonltk
< 3.10.3
Description

Summary

nltk.featstruct.FeatStructReader (used by FeatStruct(str) and by FeatureGrammar.fromstring()) parses feature-structure strings such as [a=1] with a recursive-descent parser that has no nesting-depth limit. A small, trivially-crafted input (~700 bytes) with deeply nested brackets drives the parser past Python's recursion limit and raises an unhandled RecursionError instead of the library's normal, catchable ValueError/LogicalExpressionException. Any application that parses user-supplied feature-structure or feature-grammar text (e.g. NLP teaching tools, grammar "playgrounds", unification-grammar-based NLU pipelines) can be crashed by an unauthenticated input with no special privileges. This is a Denial of Service issue (CWE-674, Uncontrolled Recursion), not a memory-safety or code-execution issue.

This appears to be the same bug class as two issues already fixed elsewhere in the codebase — nltk/jsontags.py (JSONTaggedDecoder.decode_obj, guarded by MAX_DECODE_DEPTH = 200) and nltk/sem/logic.py (LogicParser, guarded by MAX_PARSE_DEPTH = 200) — but nltk/featstruct.py does not have an equivalent guard.

Details

The recursive call chain (current develop branch, nltk/featstruct.py):

  1. FeatStructReader.fromstring() (featstruct.py:2184) calls read_partial()_read_partial() (featstruct.py:2250).
  2. _read_partial() dispatches to _read_partial_featdict(), which calls _read_value() (featstruct.py:2436) for each feature's value.
  3. _read_value() calls read_value() (featstruct.py:2442), which matches the value against VALUE_HANDLERS (featstruct.py:2478).
  4. If the value itself starts with [ (a nested feature structure), the matched handler is read_fstruct_value (featstruct.py:2479, defined at featstruct.py:2495):
    def read_fstruct_value(self, s, position, reentrances, match):
        return self.read_partial(s, position, reentrances)
    
    This calls read_partial() again, which re-enters _read_partial() — the same function from step 1.

This closes a recursive cycle (_read_partial → _read_value → read_value → read_fstruct_value → read_partial → _read_partial → ...) with no depth counter, no MAX_*_DEPTH constant, and no try/except RecursionError anywhere in the class. Each additional [ in the input adds one more full cycle of Python stack frames. Once the input nests deeply enough, Python's own recursion-limit protection fires and raises RecursionError, which is not a subclass of ValueError (the exception type this parser's own _error() helper raises for normal, well-formed parse errors) and therefore propagates uncaught through this API.

For comparison, nltk/sem/logic.py's LogicParser was hardened against exactly this class of issue:

#: Maximum expression-nesting depth the recursive-descent parser will
#: descend to. Deeply nested input would otherwise recurse until Python
#: raises an uncaught RecursionError and crashes the caller
#: (uncontrolled recursion, CWE-674); past this depth a normal
#: LogicalExpressionException is raised instead. Configurable.
MAX_PARSE_DEPTH = 200

(nltk/sem/logic.py:102-107), and nltk/jsontags.py's JSONTaggedDecoder similarly has MAX_DECODE_DEPTH = 200 with an explicit depth check. nltk/featstruct.py has no analogous protection.

FeatureGrammar.fromstring() (nltk/grammar.py) parses feature structures embedded in FCFG grammar rules via the same FeatStructReader, so the same crash is reachable through grammar-string parsing as well as through FeatStruct() directly.

PoC

Verified against the current develop branch in a clean virtualenv (Python 3.12, NLTK installed from this checkout via pip install -e .):

from nltk.featstruct import FeatStruct

depth = 167
payload = "[a=" * depth + "1" + "]" * depth   # 669 bytes
FeatStruct(payload)

Result:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  ...
  File ".../nltk/featstruct.py", line 2310, in _read_partial_featdict
    value, position = self._read_value(name, s, position, reentrances)
  File ".../nltk/featstruct.py", line 2440, in _read_value
    return self.read_value(s, position, reentrances)
  File ".../nltk/featstruct.py", line 2446, in read_value
    return handler_func(s, position, reentrances, match)
  [... repeats ~167 times ...]
RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded
  • Crash threshold: nesting depth 167 (binary-searched between 50 and 200).
  • Payload size: 669 bytes — fits trivially in a single HTTP request body/query parameter.
  • Time to crash: <2ms — no resource exhaustion is needed, only recursion depth.

Minimal reproduction (no server required):

python3 -c "
from nltk.featstruct import FeatStruct
FeatStruct('[a=' * 200 + '1' + ']' * 200)
"

Illustrative server-side context (not part of NLTK itself, but representative of how the bug becomes reachable):

from flask import Flask, request
from nltk.featstruct import FeatStruct

app = Flask(__name__)

@app.route("/parse", methods=["POST"])
def parse_grammar():
    return {"result": str(FeatStruct(request.json["grammar"]))}

A POST of {"grammar": "[a=" * 200 + "1" + "]" * 200} to this endpoint raises the uncaught RecursionError inside the request handler.

Impact

Vulnerability type: Denial of Service via uncontrolled recursion (CWE-674). This is not a memory-corruption bug and does not lead to code execution or data disclosure — Python's own recursion-limit safety net converts what would be a C-level stack overflow into a catchable (but here, uncaught) RecursionError.

Who is affected: Any application that passes externally-supplied text into nltk.featstruct.FeatStruct() or nltk.grammar.FeatureGrammar.fromstring() — for example, NLP/computational-linguistics teaching tools, unification-grammar demo services, or NLU pipelines that accept user-authored feature grammars. This is a narrower slice of NLTK's user base than, e.g., tokenization or POS tagging, since feature-structure/unification-grammar parsing is a more specialized part of the library.

Practical severity depends on deployment:

  • In typical WSGI-style web frameworks (Flask/Django/FastAPI behind gunicorn/uwsgi), an uncaught exception inside a request handler is caught at the framework/server boundary: the single request fails (HTTP 500), the worker process itself survives, and unaffected requests are unimpacted.
  • In single-threaded or per-task-unprotected contexts (e.g. a queue-consuming worker without per-task exception isolation), the uncaught RecursionError can terminate the entire process; without a process supervisor that auto-restarts it, this is a persistent outage until manually restarted. An attacker who repeats the payload can keep such a worker in a crash loop for as long as the attack continues.

Suggested fix: Add a depth counter and a MAX_PARSE_DEPTH-style constant to FeatStructReader, mirroring the existing fix in nltk/sem/logic.py, and raise the library's normal ValueError-based parse error once the limit is exceeded instead of letting RecursionError propagate.

Upload your SBOM

Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.

Risk Scores
Base Score
5.3

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the availability of the system.

Threat Intelligence
4.9

Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.

EPSS
0.27%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard