Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-cpwg-x64r-rgwg

MediumCVSS 5.9 / 10
Published Jun 12, 2026·Last modified Jun 12, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Vulnerability: CWE-362 — Concurrent Map Access Race Condition in InMemorySecret2FA

CWE: CWE-362 (Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization)

Affected Component

  • github.com/pilinux/gorest — Go REST API boilerplate
  • InMemorySecret2FA — in-memory 2FA secret store

Vulnerability Locations

| File | Line | Role | |------|------|------| | database/model/twoFA.go | 43 | Global map[uint64]Secret2FA — bare map, no sync.RWMutex | | handler/login.go | 139 | Map write during user login | | handler/twoFA.go | 205 | Map write during 2FA setup | | handler/twoFA.go | 272 | Map write during 2FA activation | | handler/twoFA.go | 575 | Map write during 2FA verification | | handler/twoFA.go | 189 | Map read during 2FA operations | | handler/twoFA.go | 245 | Map read during 2FA operations | | handler/twoFA.go | 491 | Map read during 2FA operations | | service/common.go | 79 | Map delete |

Data Flow

Multiple HTTP goroutines (concurrent requests)
    │
    ├── handler/login.go:139 ─► map write ──┐
    ├── handler/twoFA.go:205 ─► map write ──┼── InMemorySecret2FA (bare map)
    ├── handler/twoFA.go:189 ─► map read ───┤      ▲  NO sync.RWMutex
    ├── handler/twoFA.go:245 ─► map read ───┤      │
    ├── handler/twoFA.go:491 ─► map read ───┤      │
    └── service/common.go:79 ─► map delete ─┘      │
                                                   │
            Go runtime detects concurrent map      │
            read+write or write+write              │
                │                                  │
                ▼                                  │
    fatal error: concurrent map read and map write │
    fatal error: concurrent map writes             │
                │                                  │
                ▼                                  │
         Process crash (DoS) ──────────────────────┘

Description

The InMemorySecret2FA in database/model/twoFA.go was defined as a package-level map[uint64]Secret2FA — a bare Go map with no synchronization primitive. Multiple HTTP handlers in handler/login.go and handler/twoFA.go read from and wrote to this map concurrently. Go's runtime detects unsynchronized concurrent map access and throws an unrecoverable fatal error, which crashes the entire process.

This is a CWE-362 race condition: the shared resource (the map) is accessed concurrently without proper synchronization, and the failure mode is a hard process crash (denial of service).

Trigger Conditions

  1. Two users with 2FA enabled logging in simultaneously — concurrent map writes
  2. One user logging in (map write) while another performs 2FA verification (map read)
  3. Any concurrent combination of the 9 affected handler locations

Proof of Concept

# Simulate two concurrent logins with 2FA enabled
for i in 1 2; do
    curl -X POST http://target:8080/api/v1/login         -H "Content-Type: application/json"         -d "{"email":"user${i}@example.com","password":"testpass"}" &
done
wait

# Go runtime output:
# fatal error: concurrent map writes
# goroutine 34 [running]:
# runtime.throw({0x...})
#   runtime/map.go:...

Impact

  • Availability (High): Hard process crash via Go runtime fatal error. No recovery possible — the process exits. An attacker can repeat the concurrent requests to crash the service on demand.
  • Confidentiality (None): The crash itself does not leak data.
  • Integrity (None): No data corruption (Go prevents it by crashing).

Fix (PR #391)

Introduced Secret2FAStore struct with sync.RWMutex protection:

// BEFORE: database/model/twoFA.go — bare map, no protection
var InMemorySecret2FA map[uint64]Secret2FA

// AFTER: Wrapped with sync.RWMutex
type Secret2FAStore struct {
    mu   sync.RWMutex
    data map[uint64]Secret2FA
}

func (s *Secret2FAStore) Get(key uint64) (Secret2FA, bool) {
    s.mu.RLock()
    defer s.mu.RUnlock()
    v, ok := s.data[key]
    return cloneSecret2FA(v), ok
}

func (s *Secret2FAStore) Set(key uint64, value Secret2FA) {
    s.mu.Lock()
    defer s.mu.Unlock()
    s.data[key] = cloneSecret2FA(value)
}

func (s *Secret2FAStore) Delete(key uint64) {
    s.mu.Lock()
    defer s.mu.Unlock()
    delete(s.data, key)
}

// cloneSecret2FA returns a deep copy of a Secret2FA.
// This prevents external code from mutating the store's data
// through shared slice backing arrays.
func cloneSecret2FA(v Secret2FA) Secret2FA {
	out := Secret2FA{Image: v.Image}
	if v.PassHash != nil {
		out.PassHash = append([]byte(nil), v.PassHash...)
	}
	if v.KeySalt != nil {
		out.KeySalt = append([]byte(nil), v.KeySalt...)
	}
	if v.Secret != nil {
		out.Secret = append([]byte(nil), v.Secret...)
	}
	return out
}

All 9 handler call sites updated from direct map access to store method calls.

Not Vulnerable (verified during audit)

  • JWT: RSA keys from files, appleboy/gin-jwt middleware — correct
  • Password hashing: Argon2 via pilinux/argon2 — correct
  • SQL queries: GORM parameterized — correct
  • CORS: validates wildcard+credentials combination at config load — correct

Patched Versions

All versions after PR #391 merge.

Resources

  • Fix PR: https://github.com/pilinux/gorest/pull/391

Credit

Reported by @saaa99999999 via manual security audit.

Risk Scores
Base Score
5.9

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.

Threat Intelligence
5.4

Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.

EPSS
N/A

Probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Related Vulnerabilities
  • CVE-2026-48154
    Alias

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard