Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-cmhj-wh2f-9cgx
Summary
9router validates image URLs by resolving the host before fetching, but the later server-side fetch performs a separate DNS resolution. An attacker-controlled DNS name can resolve to a public IP during validation and then rebind to an internal Docker/private IP during the fetch. This allows the server-side image prefetch to reach internal-only HTTP services (SSRF).
Details
- Affected version / commit: 9router
v0.4.80@b282f05. - Reachable through
/v1/chat/completionswith a vision-capable model and animage_urlcontent part. A vision-capable model name is required so the image survives modality stripping and the server-side prefetch is armed. - The provider used in this reproduction is the bundled mock provider — no real API key and no real provider call.
- internal-admin (the SSRF target) is not exposed to the host network; it is reachable only from inside the Docker network.
- rebind-dns behaviour for
rebind.9r.test:- first A response →
1.1.1.1(public) to pass the public-host guard, - second A response →
172.29.0.10(internal-admin) during the fetch.
- first A response →
- internal-admin logs
GET /ssrf-markerwithpeer=172.29.0.30(theproxied-routercontainer), proving the server-side fetch landed on the internal service. - mock-provider receives
POST /api/chatand the flow completes withHTTP 200. - Root cause: DNS TOCTOU — the IP is not pinned between the validation resolution (the public-host guard) and the fetch resolution. The guard and the fetch each resolve the hostname independently, so a TTL-0 rebinding authority can return a public IP to the guard and an internal IP to the fetch.
Proof of Concept
This repository is a self-contained Docker Compose reproduction. No real provider is called and no real API key is required.
- Build and start the stack:
docker compose up --build - Confirm
internal-adminis unreachable from the host:curl -i http://127.0.0.1:18083/ssrf-marker # connection refused / fail docker compose ps # internal-admin has NO host port mapping - Send the request named
POST image-prefetch DNS rebinding triggerfromrequests.http, or with curl:curl -i -X POST http://127.0.0.1:18082/v1/chat/completions \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "model": "ollama-local/gemma3", "messages": [{"role":"user","content":[ {"type":"text","text":"reproduction image-prefetch trigger"}, {"type":"image_url","image_url":{"url":"http://rebind.9r.test:8080/ssrf-marker?case=rebind-trigger"}} ]}], "stream": false }'
Impact
- SSRF to internal HTTP services reachable from the 9router host/container.
- Depending on the environment, this can reach cloud metadata endpoints, internal admin panels, or be used for internal service discovery.
- Blind / semi-blind SSRF when the fetched response is not returned to the attacker; an exfil variant (pointing the image at an internal endpoint that returns valid image bytes) can return internal content base64-encoded to the upstream.
- Requires a code path that prefetches/normalizes remote images for vision-capable providers.
- No real credential is needed for the reproduction.
Suggested Fix
- Pin the resolved IP after validation and connect to that IP (resolve once, then reuse the address for the fetch).
- Block private, loopback, link-local, multicast, and cloud-metadata ranges at connect time, not only at validation time.
- Perform DNS resolution and IP checks immediately before the request and against the address actually used to connect.
- Disable redirects, or re-validate every redirect target with the same checks.
- Enforce an allowlist for image-fetch domains where feasible.
- Add a timeout, a response size limit, and a content-type check.
Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.
Drag and drop some file here, or click to select
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data. There is a low impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard