Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-c827-hfw6-qwvm
No affected components available
Summary
When using rustix::fs::Dir using the linux_raw backend, it's possible for the iterator to "get stuck" when an IO error is encountered. Combined with a memory over-allocation issue in rustix::fs::Dir::read_more, this can cause quick and unbounded memory explosion (gigabytes in a few seconds if used on a hot path) and eventually lead to an OOM crash of the application.
Details
Discovery
The symptoms were initially discovered in https://github.com/imsnif/bandwhich/issues/284. That post has lots of details of our investigation. See this post and the Discord thread for details.
Diagnosis
This issue is caused by the combination of two independent bugs:
- Stuck iterator
- The
rustix::fs::Diriterator can fail to halt after encountering an IO error, causing the caller to be stuck in an infinite loop.
- Memory over-allocation
Dir::read_moreincorrectly grows the read buffer unconditionally each time it is called, regardless of necessity.
Since <Dir as Iterator>::next calls Dir::read, which in turn calls Dir::read_more, this means an IO error encountered during reading a directory can lead to rapid and unbounded growth of memory use.
PoC
fn main() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
// create a directory, get a FD to it, then unlink the directory but keep the FD
std::fs::create_dir("tmp_dir")?;
let dir_fd = rustix::fs::openat(
rustix::fs::CWD,
rustix::cstr!("tmp_dir"),
rustix::fs::OFlags::RDONLY | rustix::fs::OFlags::CLOEXEC,
rustix::fs::Mode::empty(),
)?;
std::fs::remove_dir("tmp_dir")?;
// iterator gets stuck in infinite loop and memory explodes
rustix::fs::Dir::read_from(dir_fd)?
// the iterator keeps returning `Some(Err(_))`, but never halts by returning `None`
// therefore if the implementation ignores the error (or otherwise continues
// after seeing the error instead of breaking), the loop will not halt
.filter_map(|dirent_maybe_error| dirent_maybe_error.ok())
.for_each(|dirent| {
// your happy path
println!("{dirent:?}");
});
Ok(())
}
Impact
If a program tries to access a directory with its file descriptor after the file has been unlinked (or any other action that leaves the Dir iterator in the stuck state), and the implementation does not break after seeing an error, it can cause a memory explosion.
As an example, Linux's various virtual file systems (e.g. /proc, /sys) can contain directories that spontaneously pop in and out of existence. Attempting to iterate over them using rustix::fs::Dir directly or indirectly (e.g. with the procfs crate) can trigger this fault condition if the implementation decides to continue on errors.
An attacker knowledgeable about the implementation details of a vulnerable target can therefore try to trigger this fault condition via any one or a combination of several available APIs. If successful, the application host will quickly run out of memory, after which the application will likely be terminated by an OOM killer, leading to denial of service.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard