Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-c647-pxm2-c52w
No affected components available
Impact
In certain conditions, the memory used by the builtins raw_call, create_from_blueprint and create_copy_of can be corrupted.
- For
raw_call, the argument buffer of the call can be corrupted, leading to incorrectcalldatain the sub-context. - For
create_from_blueprintandcreate_copy_of, the buffer for the to-be-deployed bytecode can be corrupted, leading to deploying incorrect bytecode.
Below are the conditions that must be fulfilled for the corruption to happen for each builtin:
raw_call
- memory is not fully initialized, ex. all parameters to an external function live in calldata and
- The
dataargument of the builtin ismsg.data. and - The
to,valueorgaspassed to the builtin is some complex expression that results in writing to uninitialized memory (e.g. calling an internal function)
create_copy_of
- memory is not fully initialized, ex. all parameters to an external function live in calldata and
- The
valueorsaltpassed to the builtin is some complex expression that results in writing to uninitialized memory (e.g. calling an internal function)
create_from_blueprint
- memory is not fully initialized, ex. all parameters to an external function live in calldata and
- Either no constructor parameters are passed to the builtin or
raw_argsis set to True. and - The
valueorsaltpassed to the builtin is some complex expression that results in writing to uninitialized memory (e.g. calling an internal function)
Note: When the builtin is being called from an internal function f from a function g, the issue is not present provided that g has written to memory before calling f.
Examples
raw_call
In the following contract, calling bar(1,1) will return:
ae42e95100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff00000001
instead of:
ae42e95100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001
identity: constant(address) = 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000004
@external
def foo():
pass
@internal
@view
def get_address()->address:
a:uint256 = max_value(uint256) # 0xfff...fff
return identity
@external
def bar(f:uint256, u:uint256) -> Bytes[100]:
a: Bytes[100] = raw_call(self.get_address(), msg.data, max_outsize=100)
return a
create_copy_of
In the following contract, after calling test(), the code deployed at self.created_address does not match the bytecode at target.
created_address: public(address)
@external
def test(target: address) -> address:
# The expression in salt= is complex and will require to store to memory
self.created_address = create_copy_of(target, salt = keccak256(_abi_encode(target)))
return self.created_address
create_from_blueprint
In the following contract, after calling test(), the init bytecode used to create the contract deployed at the address self.created_address will not match the blueprint bytecode stored at target.
created_address: public(address)
salt: constant(bytes32) = keccak256("kebab")
@external
@payable
def test(target: address):
# The expression in salt= is complex and will require to store to memory
self.created_address = create_from_blueprint(target, code_offset=0, salt=keccak256(_abi_encode(target)))
Patches
issue tracking in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/issues/3609, patched in #3610
Workarounds
The complex expressions that are being passed as kwargs to the builtin should be cached in memory prior to the call to the builtin. For the last example above, it would be:
created_address: public(address)
salt: constant(bytes32) = keccak256("kebab")
@external
@payable
def test(target: address):
salt: bytes32 = keccak256(_abi_encode(target))
self.created_address = create_from_blueprint(target, code_offset=0, salt=salt)
References
Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard