Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-962q-hwm5-52x5
No affected components available
Summary
The custom CappedConcurrentHashMap introduced for Java TLS state tracking never removes keys from its insertion-order queue when entries are deleted. In long-running instrumented JVMs, repeated connection churn can therefore grow the queue without bound and exhaust heap memory.
Details
The vulnerable implementation is in pkg/internal/java/agent/src/main/java/io/opentelemetry/obi/java/instrumentations/util/CappedConcurrentHashMap.java#L11. New keys are appended to a ConcurrentLinkedQueue, and eviction only runs inside put() when map.size() > capacity.
The remove() method removes the key from the ConcurrentHashMap but leaves the key in the queue. Because evictIfNeeded() only checks map.size() > capacity, the queue can grow forever in workloads that insert and remove keys while keeping the live map below the cap.
This pattern is reachable from pkg/internal/java/agent/src/main/java/io/opentelemetry/obi/java/instrumentations/data/SSLStorage.java#L66, where cleanupConnectionBufMapping removes entries from bufConn and activeConnections, and removeBufferMapping removes entries from bufToBuf. In normal TLS connection lifecycles, those removals happen frequently.
PoC
Local testing with a small Java reproducer showed queue growth continuing after removals and eventually reached OutOfMemoryError, which matches the code-level leak mechanism described above.
Use a vulnerable Java agent build from v0.0.0-rc.2+build.2 or any later release that still contains the change. Start any JVM process instrumented with OBI's Java TLS support, then generate a large number of short-lived TLS handshakes.
One local reproducer is:
git checkout v0.0.0-rc.2+build.2
make build
Start a simple TLS server:
openssl req -x509 -newkey rsa:2048 -nodes -keyout /tmp/key.pem -out /tmp/cert.pem -subj '/CN=localhost' -days 1
openssl s_server -accept 9443 -key /tmp/key.pem -cert /tmp/cert.pem -quiet
Run an instrumented JVM client that repeatedly opens and closes TLS connections:
// save as /tmp/TLSChurn.java
import javax.net.ssl.*;
import java.net.Socket;
public class TLSChurn {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
SSLContext ctx = SSLContext.getInstance("TLS");
ctx.init(null, new TrustManager[]{new X509TrustManager() {
public java.security.cert.X509Certificate[] getAcceptedIssuers() { return null; }
public void checkClientTrusted(java.security.cert.X509Certificate[] c, String a) {}
public void checkServerTrusted(java.security.cert.X509Certificate[] c, String a) {}
}}, new java.security.SecureRandom());
SSLSocketFactory f = ctx.getSocketFactory();
for (;;) {
try (Socket s = f.createSocket("127.0.0.1", 9443)) {
s.getOutputStream().write("x".getBytes());
} catch (Exception ignored) {}
}
}
}
Compile and run:
javac /tmp/TLSChurn.java
java TLSChurn
Attach the vulnerable OBI Java instrumentation to the JVM. Over time, heap usage in the OBI Java agent process grows even though live connection counts remain bounded. A heap dump will show large retention from ConcurrentLinkedQueue nodes owned by CappedConcurrentHashMap.
Impact
This issue causes an availability loss in instrumented Java workloads that use OBI's TLS instrumentation. Repeated connection setup and teardown can grow the retained queue until the Java helper experiences long GC pauses or exhausts heap memory with OutOfMemoryError.
The vulnerability requires local access to the device to be exploited. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard