Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-95px-34x5-p37h
Summary
MobSF's Android App Link assetlinks checker validates only the manifest android:host value with valid_host(), but then appends the separate android:port value into the URL used for the server-side request. This bypasses the current port restriction in valid_host() and lets a crafted APK cause MobSF to fetch http://host:<attacker-port>/.well-known/assetlinks.json or https://host:<attacker-port>/.well-known/assetlinks.json.
Impact
An authenticated user who can upload or trigger analysis of a crafted APK can cause the MobSF server to make an outbound request to an attacker-selected port during Android manifest analysis. When the host is controlled by the attacker and uses DNS rebinding, the validation lookup can resolve to a public IP while the later HTTP client lookup resolves to an internal address, allowing SSRF to internal services on non-80/443 ports.
This is not arbitrary URL SSRF. The path remains fixed to /.well-known/assetlinks.json, and redirects are disabled. The bypass is that the final fetched URL is assembled after the host-only validation, so the current port guard is not applied to the actual URL.
Root cause
valid_host() rejects ports other than 80 and 443 when a port is included in the string being validated:
port = parsed.port
...
if port and port not in (80, 443):
return False
In get_browsable_activities(), only the host attribute is passed to valid_host():
host = data.getAttribute(f'{ns}:host')
port = data.getAttribute(f'{ns}:port')
...
if not valid_host(host):
logger.warning('Invalid Host: %s', host)
continue
shost = f'{scheme}://{host}'
if port and is_number(port):
c_url = f'{shost}:{port}{WELL_KNOWN_PATH}'
else:
c_url = f'{shost}{WELL_KNOWN_PATH}'
well_known[c_url] = shost
_check_url() then fetches the assembled URL after checking only path, query, and params:
purl = urlparse(url)
if (purl.path != WELL_KNOWN_PATH
or len(purl.query) > 0
or len(purl.params) > 0):
logger.warning('Invalid Assetlinks URL: %s', url)
continue
r = requests.get(url,
timeout=5,
allow_redirects=False,
proxies=proxies,
verify=verify)
Reproduction
Use an Android manifest with a browsable App Link data tag that has a benign-looking host and a restricted port:
<activity android:name=".DeepLink" android:exported="true">
<intent-filter>
<action android:name="android.intent.action.VIEW" />
<category android:name="android.intent.category.BROWSABLE" />
<category android:name="android.intent.category.DEFAULT" />
<data android:scheme="http" android:host="rebind.example" android:port="22" />
</intent-filter>
</activity>
A safe local proof with DNS and HTTP monkeypatching shows that MobSF validates only rebind.example, then fetches a URL that preserves the unchecked port:
well_known map: {'http://rebind.example:22/.well-known/assetlinks.json': 'http://rebind.example'}
requests.get calls: [('http://rebind.example:22/.well-known/assetlinks.json', {'timeout': 5, 'allow_redirects': False, 'proxies': None, 'verify': True})]
findings: [{'url': 'http://rebind.example:22/.well-known/assetlinks.json', 'host': 'http://rebind.example', 'status_code': 200, 'status': True}]
VULNERABLE: valid_host validated only rebind.example, but assetlinks_check fetched unchecked port 22 via http://rebind.example:22/.well-known/assetlinks.json
The same code pattern is present in latest release v4.4.6 and current main.
Remediation
Validate the final URL after all manifest components have been applied. In particular:
- Build
c_url, then run validation on the full URL, including scheme, hostname, port, path, query, and params. - Reject
android:portvalues other than 80 and 443 before appending them to the URL. - Prevent DNS rebinding by pinning the validated DNS result to the outbound connection or otherwise ensuring the actual HTTP request cannot resolve to a different address than the validation step.
- Keep
allow_redirects=Falsefor the existing redirect mitigation.
Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.
Drag and drop some file here, or click to select
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker needs high-level or administrative privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information.
Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard