Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-954p-556p-r752

HighCVSS 8.2 / 10
Published Jul 28, 2026·Last modified Jul 28, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

JSON-Schema $ref values pointing at HTTP or HTTPS URLs are silently dereferenced by datamodel-code-generator with no IP/host validation, no scheme allow-list, and redirects followed unconditionally. The --allow-remote-refs gate added in 0.56.0 defaults to None, which only emits a deprecation warning and then fetches the URL anyway; only explicit --allow-remote-refs=false blocks the request. The fetched body is parsed as a sub-schema and reflected verbatim into the generated .py source. As a result, any JSON-Schema document the developer feeds to datamodel-codegen — including documents authored by an attacker — can pivot to arbitrary internal addresses and leak the response into the generated code, with no developer cooperation beyond running the tool.

Details

Sink: src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/jsonschema.py, _get_ref_body (lines 4776–4793, at tag 0.60.1 / commit a321547e):

def _get_ref_body(self, resolved_ref: str) -> dict[str, YamlValue]:
    if is_url(resolved_ref):
        if not resolved_ref.startswith("file://") and self.http_local_ref_path is None:
            if self.allow_remote_refs is False:
                raise Error(f"Fetching remote $ref is disabled: {resolved_ref}...")
            if self.allow_remote_refs is None:
                warn_deprecated(                            # (A) warn only
                    "behavior.remote-ref-default",
                    details=f"Reference: {resolved_ref}",
                    stacklevel=2,
                )
        return self._get_ref_body_from_url(resolved_ref)    # (B) fetch fires
    return self._get_ref_body_from_remote(resolved_ref)
  • (A) emits a deprecation warning when allow_remote_refs is its default (None); execution falls through to (B).
  • (B) routes the URL through _get_text_from_urlget_body, the same fetcher described in other report — no IP validation, redirects followed.

The fetched body is then parsed as a sub-schema and merged into the model graph, so description, title, properties, etc. from the remote document end up in the generated .py source.

Only affects users who installed the [http] extra (pip install 'datamodel-code-generator[http]').

PoC

A self-contained one-file PoC is available here: https://gist.github.com/thegr1ffyn/562a6972d7dc3f2869458ae93fc608c0

Impact

Who is impacted. Anyone running datamodel-codegen on a JSON-Schema or OpenAPI document of uncertain provenance, with the [http] extra installed. Real-world scenarios:

  1. Trojaned OpenAPI document. A public REST API publishes openapi.yaml. One $ref points at http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/<role>; running datamodel-codegen against the spec from an EC2 instance leaks the IAM credentials into the generated client.
  2. Customer-supplied JSON Schema. A B2B SaaS auto-generates client code from customer-uploaded schemas. The customer adds an HTTP $ref to http://internal-admin:8080/users.json; the response (e.g. JSON user list) ends up in the generated Python the SaaS hands back to the customer.
  3. CI on a private network. A PR adds schemas/inbound.json with an HTTP $ref pointed at a service reachable only from the CI cluster's VPC; the CI runner fetches it and the generated .py leaks the response in PR artifacts.

Higher real-world risk than the sibling CLI-flag SSRF (other SSRF in this report bundle) because the schema author chooses the destination — the developer doesn't have to type any URL.

Suggested fix.

  1. Flip the default in parser/base.py: allow_remote_refs: bool = False, and remove the silent-fetch-with-warning fallback at parser/jsonschema.py:4786-4791.
  2. When fetching is allowed, apply the same IP/host validation proposed for other submitted SSRF report to both the initial $ref URL and every redirect target.
  3. Document HTTP $ref in a third-party schema as equivalent to running curl on the developer's host.

Maintainer resolution

This $ref report is fixed by the same shared HTTP fetcher hardening that resolved GHSA-rfr2-mq9m-x2qx. The code landed through the GHSA-rfr2 private security PR koxudaxi/datamodel-code-generator-ghsa-rfr2-mq9m-x2qx#1 and was merged into the public repository as 5fdba4a09f2d7a9996a504975b7ef7d63e3715bb. Follow-up generated-file and coverage fixes were merged in koxudaxi/datamodel-code-generator#3279 and docs were synced in #3280. The patched release is 0.61.0.

No separate net code diff remains in the GHSA-954 private PR because the shared HTTP fetcher patch is already present on main. This advisory remains separate because the affected entry point is remote JSON Schema/OpenAPI $ref resolution rather than direct CLI --url input.

The fix does not flip the --allow-remote-refs compatibility default in this patch. Instead, it mitigates the SSRF issue by blocking localhost, loopback, private, link-local, reserved, and other non-public network targets by default, validating every redirect target before it is fetched, and requiring --allow-private-network / allow_private_network=True for trusted internal schema endpoints. Remote $ref fetching remains controlled by --allow-remote-refs; non-public/internal targets additionally require --allow-private-network.

Submitted by: Hamza Haroon (thegr1ffyn)

Risk Scores
Base Score
8.2

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. The attacker needs the user to perform some action, like clicking a link. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data.

Threat Intelligence
7.5

Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.

EPSS
0.21%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard