Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-8qqm-fp2q-v734

HighCVSS 8.2 / 10
Published Jul 17, 2026·Last modified Jul 17, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

A wrong policy can be an open door. You have to check input.attributes.request.http.truncated_body in your policy.

Description

Incomplete fix for CVE-2026-50197: an oversized declared-Content-Length body still hands OPA an empty parsed_body, so deny-on-presence Rego policies fail OPEN while the full payload reaches upstream.

The CVE-2026-50197 fix (commit 3152f3b0, PR #4041, v0.26.10) substituted expectedSize = maxBodyBytes only when req.ContentLength < 0 (chunked / HTTP/2 without content-length). But when a request declares a Content-Length larger than maxBodyBytes, expectedSize > maxBodyBytes, the body-extraction if is skipped entirely, and ExtractHttpBodyOptionally returns rawBodyBytes = nil — so OPA evaluates an empty parsed_body, while the full forbidden payload still flows to the upstream. A deny-on-presence policy (default allow = true; allow = false if input.parsed_body.<forbidden>) — the exact Rego shape the advisory describes — fails OPEN. The fix's own comment reasons only about ContentLength == -1; the oversized branch was never considered, and the added PoC test only covers small bodies.

Affected code

  • filters/openpolicyagent/openpolicyagent.go ExtractHttpBodyOptionally: the expectedSize <= maxBodyBytes gate lets an oversized declared body fall through to return req.Body, nil, func() {}, nil (OPA sees an empty document).
  • Corroborated by Skipper's own unit test "Read body exhausting max bytes" ({ "welcome": "world" }, maxBodySize: 5bodyInPolicy: "").

Steps to reproduce

See attached docker-compose.yml (official golang image) + setup.sh + exploit.sh, which run a real Skipper proxy (proxytest) with a real OPA control plane (opasdktest), WithMaxRequestBodyBytes(32), policy allow = false if input.parsed_body.action == "delete", route * -> opaAuthorizeRequestWithBody("test") -> upstream:

  • {"action":"delete"} (19B ≤ 32) → 403 (denied).
  • {"action":"delete","pad":"X..64"} (> 32) → 200, upstream received the full body (BYPASS).
  • small chunked {"action":"delete"}403 (positive control: the original CVE is fixed).

(Library-tier: validated via Skipper's real proxy test harness, not a deploy of the official image; benign oracle = status diff + upstream-received body; no RCE.)

Impact

Deployments authorizing on request-body content via opaAuthorizeRequestWithBody + deny-on-presence Rego can be bypassed by inflating the request body past -open-policy-agent-max-request-body-size (default 1 MB); the full payload still reaches the upstream.

Mitigation

Document how policy owners should block requests with oversized body.

Example deny by default and use "allow if" no oversized body:

default allow := false

allow if {
    input.attributes.request.http.truncated_body == false
    # ... body-based conditions
}

Example allow by default and use "deny if" an oversized body:

default deny := false

deny if {
    input.attributes.request.http.truncated_body == true
    # ... body-based conditions
}

Documentation is published by https://github.com/zalando/skipper/releases/tag/v0.27.26

Credit

Reported as part of an incomplete-patch measurement study (responsible disclosure).

Risk Scores
Base Score
8.2

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data.

Threat Intelligence
7.5

Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.

EPSS
N/A

Probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard