Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-8qpj-27x8-pwpq
Summary
Langflow's built-in Python interpreter components — PythonREPLComponent (Python Interpreter) and the legacy PythonREPLToolComponent (Python REPL Tool) — executed arbitrary user- or model-supplied Python code inside flows without effective sandboxing. Because the code ran in-process with the privileges of the Langflow service, any authenticated user who could edit and run a flow could achieve remote code execution and, from there, escalate privileges to superuser (e.g. by opening a database session and flipping is_superuser) or compromise the host.
This issue is fixed as of 1.10.1, with additional hardening through 1.12.3. See Remediation below.
Affected
- Package:
langflow(PyPI), and the underlyinglfxpackage that ships the component. - Vulnerable versions:
< 1.10.1. - Patched:
1.10.1(core fix). Upgrade to>= 1.12.3for the complete hardening series.
Details
The root cause is code injection (CWE-94/CWE-95): the component passed raw input to LangChain's PythonREPL, which is explicitly not a security sandbox.
Two distinct weaknesses existed before 1.10.1:
-
Unrestricted builtins (default deployments).
get_globals()built theexecglobals from theglobal_importsallow-list but never set__builtins__. CPython'sexec()then auto-injected the fullbuiltinsmodule, leaving__import__,open,eval,execand the whole import machinery reachable regardless of the allow-list — e.g.__import__("os").system(...)or__import__("subprocess").check_output([...]). This made the "only modules in Global Imports can be used" guarantee false, and it applied even with the default configuration (allow_custom_components=True). -
No server-policy gate (locked-down deployments). Even a deployment hardened with
allow_custom_components=Falsecould still run interpreter code, because the components did not consult that policy before executing.
Both let an authenticated user run the reported PoC, which opens a DB session and sets is_superuser = True on their account, or writes to the filesystem / runs OS commands with the service's privileges.
PoC (as reported)
- Authenticate as a normal user.
- Create a flow with the
PythonREPLComponent. - Execute Python that imports Langflow internals and elevates the account:
import asyncio
from sqlmodel import select
from langflow.services.database.models.user.model import User
from langflow.services.deps import session_scope
async def escalate():
async with session_scope() as session:
stmt = select(User).where(User.username == 'testuser')
user = (await session.exec(stmt)).first()
if user:
user.is_superuser = True
session.add(user)
await session.commit()
asyncio.run(escalate())
Impact
Any authenticated user could:
- Execute arbitrary Python / OS commands with the Langflow service's privileges (RCE).
- Escalate their own account to superuser via direct database access.
- Read/modify data and configuration, and potentially pivot to the underlying host.
Remediation
Upgrade to Langflow 1.10.1 or later (preferably >= 1.12.3). The interpreter components were hardened with layered, defense-in-depth controls, applied in run_python_repl() before any code is executed:
- Restricted builtins —
get_globals()injects a curatedsafe_builtins()mapping, removing__import__,eval,exec,compile,open,input,globals/locals/vars,getattr/setattr, etc. (#13397) - AST validation —
validate_code_safety()rejects inlineimport/from ... import, dunder/escape-gadget attribute access (__class__,__subclasses__,__globals__, frame/traceback introspection) and format-string dunder traversal. (#13397) - Server-policy gate —
ensure_code_execution_enabled()refuses to run whenallow_custom_components=Falseorblock_code_interpreter_components=True, and fails closed if the settings stack cannot be resolved. (#13700 — this advisory — and #14375) - Allow-listed module proxies — imported modules are exposed via a proxy that blocks reaching
sys.modules["os"]through a module's transitive import graph. (#15198) - Optional hardware isolation — configure
LANGFLOW_SANDBOX_BACKENDto run interpreter code in an isolated microVM instead of in-process. (#14400)
Upstream fix references: #13397, #13700 (carries this GHSA), #14375, #14400, #15198.
Hardening recommendations for operators
- Keep Langflow updated (>= 1.12.3).
- For locked-down deployments, set
LANGFLOW_ALLOW_CUSTOM_COMPONENTS=false(orLANGFLOW_BLOCK_CODE_INTERPRETER_COMPONENTS=true) to disable the interpreter entirely. - For deployments that must run untrusted code, configure
LANGFLOW_SANDBOX_BACKENDfor microVM isolation. - Run the Langflow service as an unprivileged user with least-privilege database credentials.
Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.
Drag and drop some file here, or click to select
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.
Active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. Immediate patching or mitigation is required.
Probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
- CVE-2026-10561Alias
- EUVD-2026-38245Alias
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard