Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-88g4-74f3-63x9

MediumCVSS 4.9 / 10
Published Aug 25, 2026·Last modified Aug 26, 2026
Affected Components(2)
Packagist logophpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
4.0.0-alpha – 4.1.5
Packagist logothorsten/phpmyfaq
4.0.0-alpha – 4.1.5
Description

Summary

There is an authenticated path traversal condition in the PDF export functionality, specifically within the PDF image resolution logic.

The issue may allow a privileged FAQ editor to cause the application to attempt reading files outside the intended content directory during PDF generation.


Affected Component

File: src/phpMyFAQ/Export/Pdf/Wrapper.php

Function: concatenatePaths()


Root Cause

The path resolution logic relies on locating the substring "content" within a user-controlled path:

$pos = strpos($trimmedFile, 'content');
$relativePath = substr($trimmedFile, (int) $pos);

If "content" is not present, strpos() returns false, which becomes 0 when cast to an integer.

As a result, the entire attacker-controlled path is preserved.

Example:

$trimmedFile = "../../../etc/passwd";
$pos = false;
$relativePath = "../../../etc/passwd";

The resulting path is later processed by:

file_get_contents($resolvedPath);

without canonicalization or a root-directory containment check.


Observed Data Flow

FAQ Content
    ->
PDF Export
    ->
WriteHTML()
    ->
Wrapper::Image()
    ->
concatenatePaths()
    ->
file_get_contents()

Potential Impact

Based on code review, a user with FAQ editing privileges may be able to store HTML containing crafted image paths that are processed during PDF generation.

Potential consequences may include:

  • Path traversal outside the intended content directory
  • Local file read attempts during PDF export
  • Possible disclosure of readable files depending on file type, sanitization behavior, and PDF rendering constraints

Discovery Method

This issue was initially detected by an internally developed SAST tool during analysis of the phpMyFAQ source code.

The finding was then manually investigated and validated through code review.

While the original scanner output classified the issue as a generic path traversal/local file inclusion pattern, manual analysis identified the specific root cause in the path resolution logic of concatenatePaths().


Potential Exploitation Scenario

The following scenario is based on code review and intended to illustrate the potential impact:

  1. A user with FAQ editing privileges creates or modifies a FAQ entry.

  2. The FAQ content contains an HTML image tag with a crafted relative path that does not include the expected content directory reference.

  3. The HTML content is stored and later processed by the PDF export functionality.

  4. When a user requests the PDF version of the FAQ, the application invokes WriteHTML(), which eventually reaches Wrapper::Image().

  5. concatenatePaths() constructs a filesystem path without canonicalization or directory containment validation.

  6. The resulting path reaches file_get_contents(), causing the application to attempt reading a file outside the intended content directory.

  7. Depending on sanitization behavior, file permissions, image validation, and PDF rendering behavior, the contents of the targeted file may potentially be exposed to the PDF consumer.

Based on my current analysis, exploitation would require a user capable of editing FAQ content and is therefore not considered an anonymous or unauthenticated attack vector.


Suggested Remediation

Consider replacing substring-based path anchoring with:

  • realpath() canonicalization
  • Strict root-directory containment checks
  • Explicit allowlisting of permitted image locations
Upload your SBOM

Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.

Risk Scores
Base Score
4.9

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs high-level or administrative privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information.

Threat Intelligence
4.5

Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.

EPSS
0.40%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard