Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-78fc-9688-w8xw
No affected components available
Affected Versions
version ≤ 2.7.8 (latest version at time of disclosure)
https://github.com/openmrs/openmrs-core
Impact
The endpoint POST /openmrs/ws/rest/v1/module is vulnerable to a path traversal (Zip Slip) attack. An authenticated attacker can upload a crafted .omod archive containing ZIP entries with directory traversal sequences. Upon automatic extraction by the server, the incomplete path validation in WebModuleUtil.startModule() fails to prevent entries such as web/module/../../../../malicious.jsp from being written outside the intended module directory. If the traversal target falls within the web application root (e.g., /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/openmrs/), the attacker achieves arbitrary file write and subsequent Remote Code Execution.
Notably, other extraction methods in the same codebase (ModuleUtil.expandJar(), TestInstallUtil.addZippedTestModules()) are properly protected with normalize().startsWith() checks — this vulnerability is an oversight where the same fix was not applied.
Furthermore, the module.allow_web_admin runtime property, which is intended to restrict administrators from managing modules via the web interface, only gates the Legacy UI controller entry point. The REST API endpoint POST /openmrs/ws/rest/v1/module does not check this property, allowing this restriction to be fully bypassed.
Steps to Reproduce
- Construct a malicious
.omodfile (which is a ZIP/JAR archive) containing a ZIP entry with a path traversal payload in its entry name, such asweb/module/../../../../<target_filename>. Upload this file toPOST /openmrs/ws/rest/v1/modulewith valid admin credentials via Basic Auth.
- The server parses and loads the module. During
WebModuleUtil.startModule(), entries underweb/module/are automatically extracted. The existing checkPaths.get(name).startsWith("..")only blocks entries beginning with.., so an entry starting withweb/module/passes the check. The../sequences in the remaining path cause the file to be written outside the intendedWEB-INF/view/module/directory — for example, into the web application root at/usr/local/tomcat/webapps/openmrs/.
- The traversed file is now accessible under the web application root. If the written file is a JSP script, accessing it via the browser triggers server-side execution, achieving RCE.
Root Cause Analysis
The vulnerability exists in WebModuleUtil.startModule() (web/src/main/java/org/openmrs/module/web/WebModuleUtil.java).
Vulnerable code:
Enumeration<JarEntry> entries = jarFile.entries();
while (entries.hasMoreElements()) {
JarEntry entry = entries.nextElement();
String name = entry.getName();
// ❌ Incomplete check — only blocks entries starting with ".."
if (Paths.get(name).startsWith("..")) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("...");
}
if (name.startsWith("web/module/")) {
String filepath = name.substring(11);
StringBuilder absPath = new StringBuilder(realPath + "/WEB-INF");
absPath.append("/view/module/");
absPath.append(mod.getModuleIdAsPath()).append("/").append(filepath);
// ❌ No normalize() or startsWith() boundary check before writing
File outFile = new File(absPath.toString().replace("/", File.separator));
outStream = new FileOutputStream(outFile, false);
inStream = jarFile.getInputStream(entry);
OpenmrsUtil.copyFile(inStream, outStream);
}
}
Why the check fails: For an entry named web/module/foo/../../../../evil.jsp, Paths.get(name) starts with web, not .., so the check passes. After name.substring(11), the filepath foo/../../../../evil.jsp is concatenated directly into the output path without normalization, resulting in a write outside the intended directory.
Correctly protected code in the same codebase:
ModuleUtil.expandJar():
// ✅ Correct — uses normalize().startsWith()
if (!parent.toPath().normalize().startsWith(docBase)) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("...");
}
TestInstallUtil.addZippedTestModules():
// ✅ Correct — uses normalize().startsWith()
if (!zipEntryFile.toPath().normalize().startsWith(moduleRepository.toPath().normalize())) {
throw new IOException("Bad zip entry");
}
The fix pattern is already known and applied elsewhere in the codebase. WebModuleUtil.startModule() is an oversight.
Bypass of module.allow_web_admin
The module.allow_web_admin property only restricts module operations at the Legacy UI layer (ModuleListController). The REST API endpoint does not consult this property:
Legacy UI: POST /admin/modules/moduleList.form → allowAdmin() check → [BLOCKED]
REST API: POST /ws/rest/v1/module → No allowAdmin() check → [ALLOWED]
↓
ModuleFactory.loadModule()
↓
WebModuleUtil.startModule() ← Zip Slip here, no allowAdmin check
↓
FileOutputStream.write() ← Arbitrary file write
Remediation
Add normalize().startsWith() boundary validation before writing, consistent with the existing pattern in ModuleUtil.expandJar():
File outFile = new File(absPath.toString().replace("/", File.separator));
// ✅ Add this check
if (!outFile.toPath().normalize().startsWith(
Paths.get(realPath, "WEB-INF").normalize())) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException(
"Zip entry '" + name + "' would be written outside the allowed directory.");
}
Additionally, enforce the module.allow_web_admin restriction consistently across all module upload entry points, including the REST API.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs high-level or administrative privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data.
Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard