Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-73h3-mf4w-8647
No affected components available
Summary
The extractall() function in src/poetry/utils/helpers.py:410-426 extracts sdist tarballs without path traversal protection on Python versions where tarfile.data_filter is unavailable. Considering only Python versions which are still supported by Poetry, these are 3.10.0 - 3.10.12 and 3.11.0 - 3.11.4.
Impact
Arbitrary file write (path traversal) from untrusted sdist content.
In practice, the impact is low because an attacker who exploits this vulnerability can as well include arbitrary code in a setup.py, which will be executed when the sdist is built after tar extraction. In other words, a malicious sdist can write arbitrary files by design. However, since it is unexpected and not by design that the file write already happens during tar extraction, this is still considered a vulnerability.
On Python 3.11.2 (Debian Bookworm default, directly tested), a crafted sdist with ../../ tar member paths writes files outside the intended extraction directory. The traversal occurs during metadata resolution (poetry add --lock), before the build backend is run.
Affected Environments:
- Python 3.10.0 through 3.10.12 (inclusive):
tarfile.data_filterabsent or broken - Python 3.11.0 through 3.11.4 (inclusive):
tarfile.data_filterabsent or broken - Debian Bookworm: Python 3.11.2 (default)
- Ubuntu 22.04 LTS: Python 3.10.6 (default)
Patches
Versions 2.3.4 and newer of Poetry ensure that paths are inside the target directory.
Root Cause
File: src/poetry/utils/helpers.py, lines 410-426:
def extractall(source: Path, dest: Path, zip: bool) -> None:
"""Extract all members from either a zip or tar archive."""
if zip:
with zipfile.ZipFile(source) as archive:
archive.extractall(dest)
else:
broken_tarfile_filter = {(3, 9, 17), (3, 10, 12), (3, 11, 4)}
with tarfile.open(source) as archive:
if (
hasattr(tarfile, "data_filter")
and sys.version_info[:3] not in broken_tarfile_filter
):
archive.extractall(dest, filter="data")
else:
archive.extractall(dest) # <-- NO FILTER: path traversal
On Python versions without a working tarfile.data_filter, the else branch at line 426 calls tarfile.extractall() without any filter or path validation. This enables three attack vectors:
- Direct path traversal: Tar members with
../../path components write files outside the extraction directory. - Symlink traversal: A symlink member pointing outside dest, followed by a file written through that symlink, escapes the boundary.
- Hardlink attacks: Hardlink members can read arbitrary files (same inode) or overwrite targets outside dest.
Call Sites
This function is called from two locations:
-
src/poetry/installation/chef.py:104(_prepare_sdist): Duringpoetry install/poetry addwhen building a package from sdist. Only triggered when the executor is enabled (actual installation). -
src/poetry/inspection/info.py:322(_from_sdist_file): During dependency resolution (poetry lock/poetry add). This path is reached when the sdist'sPKG-INFOlacksRequires-Distmetadata, forcing Poetry to extract the archive (and afterwards build the package).
Suggested Fix
Apply path validation in the else branch, covering direct traversal, symlinks, and hardlinks:
def extractall(source: Path, dest: Path, zip: bool) -> None:
"""Extract all members from either a zip or tar archive."""
if zip:
with zipfile.ZipFile(source) as archive:
archive.extractall(dest)
else:
broken_tarfile_filter = {(3, 9, 17), (3, 10, 12), (3, 11, 4)}
with tarfile.open(source) as archive:
if (
hasattr(tarfile, "data_filter")
and sys.version_info[:3] not in broken_tarfile_filter
):
archive.extractall(dest, filter="data")
else:
# Validate all member paths before extraction
dest_resolved = dest.resolve()
safe_members = []
for member in archive.getmembers():
member_path = (dest_resolved / member.name).resolve()
if not member_path.is_relative_to(dest_resolved):
raise ValueError(
f"Refusing to extract {member.name}: "
f"would write outside {dest}"
)
if member.issym():
link_target = (member_path.parent / member.linkname).resolve()
if not link_target.is_relative_to(dest_resolved):
raise ValueError(
f"Refusing symlink {member.name}: "
f"target {member.linkname} outside {dest}"
)
elif member.islnk():
link_target = (dest_resolved / member.linkname).resolve()
if not link_target.is_relative_to(dest_resolved):
raise ValueError(
f"Refusing hardlink {member.name}: "
f"target {member.linkname} outside {dest}"
)
safe_members.append(member)
archive.extractall(dest, members=safe_members)
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights.
Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard