Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-5q9x-554g-9jgg

MediumCVSS 5.8 / 10
Published Apr 11, 2025·Last modified Apr 11, 2025
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

SurrealDB offers http functions that can access external network endpoints. A typical, albeit not recommended configuration would be to start SurrealDB with all network connections allowed with the exception of a deny list. For example, surreal start --allow-net --deny-net 10.0.0.0/8 will allow all network connections except to the 10.0.0.0/8 block.

An authenticated user of SurrealDB can use redirects to bypass this restriction. For example by hosting a server on the public internet which redirects to the IP addresses blocked by the administrator of the SurrealDB server via HTTP 301 or 307 response codes.

When sending SurrealDB statements containing the http::* functions to the attacker controlled host, the SurrealDB server will follow the redirects to the blocked IP address. Because the statements also return the responses to the attacker, this issue constitutes a full SSRF vulnerability.

This issue was discovered and patched during an code audit and penetration test of SurrealDB by cure53, the severity as defined within cure53's preliminary finding is Medium, matched by our CVSS v4 assessment.

Impact

The impact of this vulnerability is circumvention of the --deny-net capability and resulting impact on systems external to SurrealDB. The ultimate impact is dependent on the deployment scenario.

For example, if the SurrealDB server blocks requests to internal and private IP addresses because they run services which don't require authentication, such as AWS deployments using IMDSv1, the attacker can access these internal endpoints directly, and potentially retrieve or even alter sensitive information and credentials.

The circumvention could also be used to redirect traffic to the SurrealDB port, providing a low level of impact to availability.

Patches

A patch has been created that adds an HTTP redirect limit, and checks HTTP redirects against allowed network targets, preventing redirections to disallowed uri's.

  • Versions 2.0.5, 2.1.5, 2.2.2 and later are not affected by this issue.

Workarounds

The possibility of this vulnerability being exploited can be reduced by following an allowlist approach to enabling the http capability surreal start --allow-net 10.0.0.0/8 or using the equivalent SURREAL_CAPS_ALLOW_NET environment variable, where endpoints allowed are fully trusted and are not controlled by regular users.

The network access capability can be disabled, using --deny-net or the equivalent SURREAL_CAPS_DENY_NET environment variable without specifying targets, with impact to SurrealDB functionality.

As the impact of this vulnerability depends on the security of the deployment environment of SurrealDB, best practices should be followed within that environment.

References

#5597 SurrealDB Documentation - Environment Variables SurrealDB Documentation - Capabilities SurrealDB Documentation - Network Access Capability

Risk Scores
Base Score
5.8

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.

Threat Intelligence
1.5

Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.

EPSS
0.23%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard