Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-5q48-q4fm-g3m6
No affected components available
Hi,
The Matches() function in rules/rules.go uses strings.HasPrefix() without a trailing directory separator when matching paths against access rules. A rule for /uploads also matches /uploads_backup/, granting or denying access to unintended directories. Verified against v2.62.2 (commit 860c19d).
Details
At rules/rules.go:29-35:
func (r *Rule) Matches(path string) bool {
if r.Regex {
return r.Regexp.MatchString(path)
}
return strings.HasPrefix(path, r.Path)
}
When a rule has Path: "/uploads", any path starting with /uploads matches, including /uploads_backup/secret.txt. The regex variant at line 31 uses proper matching, but the non-regex path uses a prefix check without ensuring the match ends at a directory boundary.
The Check() function at http/data.go:29-48 iterates all rules with last-match-wins semantics. No secondary validation exists beyond this prefix check.
PoC
Admin configures: allow rule Path: "/shared" for a restricted user.
Filesystem contains:
/shared/(intended to be accessible)/shared_private/(intended to be restricted)
User requests /shared_private/secret.txt:
strings.HasPrefix("/shared_private/secret.txt", "/shared")returns true- Allow rule applies
- Access granted to the unintended directory
Impact
Authenticated users can access files in sibling directories that share a common prefix with an allowed directory, bypassing the admin's intended access configuration.
Prior art
Prior advisories GHSA-4mh3-h929-w968 (path-based access control bypass) and GHSA-9f3r-2vgw-m8xp (path traversal in copy/rename) addressed related access control issues. This HasPrefix prefix-collision is a distinct, unreported variant.
Suggested Fix
func (r *Rule) Matches(path string) bool {
if r.Regex {
return r.Regexp.MatchString(path)
}
prefix := r.Path
if prefix != "/" && !strings.HasSuffix(prefix, "/") {
prefix += "/"
}
return path == r.Path || strings.HasPrefix(path, prefix)
}
Koda Reef
Update: Fix submitted as PR #5889.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.
Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard